From: Jeff Layton via Bugspray Bot <bugbot@kernel.org>
To: anna@kernel.org, aglo@umich.edu, trondmy@kernel.org,
cel@kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, jlayton@kernel.org
Subject: Re: warning in nfsd4_cb_done
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 16:35:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250210-b219737c10-80a0d6c000db@bugzilla.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250204-b219737c8-56e36733bccb@bugzilla.kernel.org>
Jeff Layton writes via Kernel.org Bugzilla:
(In reply to Chuck Lever from comment #8)
> (In reply to rik.theys from comment #7)
> > Is it possible this patch has not (yet) been sent to stable@vger.kernel.org
> > so it ends up in 6.12.y?
>
> Commit 1b3e26a5ccbf has been in a publicly released kernel for exactly two
> days (as of this writing). It will take some time before it appears in any
> LTS kernel. For now, if you would like to test the commit, you need to apply
> it manually.
Now that I look, 1b3e26a5ccbf is wrong. The patch on the ml was correct, but the one that got committed is different. It should be:
status = decode_cb_op_status(xdr, OP_CB_GETATTR, &cb->cb_status);
if (unlikely(status || cb->cb_status))
If "status" is non-zero, decoding failed (usu. BADXDR), but we also want to bail out and not decode the rest of the call if the decoded cb_status is non-zero. That's not happening here, cb_seq_status has already been checked and is non-zero, so this ends up trying to decode the rest of the CB_GETATTR reply when it doesn't exist.
View: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219737#c10
You can reply to this message to join the discussion.
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
Kernel.org Bugzilla (bugspray 0.1-dev)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-10 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-30 14:05 warning in nfsd4_cb_done rik.theys via Bugspray Bot
2025-01-30 14:10 ` Chuck Lever via Bugspray Bot
2025-01-30 15:08 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2025-01-30 15:20 ` Chuck Lever via Bugspray Bot
2025-01-30 15:20 ` Chuck Lever via Bugspray Bot
2025-01-30 15:55 ` Chuck Lever via Bugspray Bot
2025-01-30 14:20 ` rik.theys via Bugspray Bot
2025-02-04 13:30 ` rik.theys via Bugspray Bot
2025-02-04 13:30 ` Chuck Lever via Bugspray Bot
2025-02-10 15:03 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2025-02-10 16:35 ` Jeff Layton via Bugspray Bot [this message]
2025-02-10 15:45 ` Jeff Layton via Bugspray Bot
2025-02-10 16:45 ` Chuck Lever via Bugspray Bot
2025-02-24 11:55 ` rik.theys via Bugspray Bot
2025-02-24 12:20 ` Jeff Layton via Bugspray Bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250210-b219737c10-80a0d6c000db@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--to=bugbot@kernel.org \
--cc=aglo@umich.edu \
--cc=anna@kernel.org \
--cc=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trondmy@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox