public inbox for linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton via Bugspray Bot <bugbot@kernel.org>
To: anna@kernel.org, aglo@umich.edu, trondmy@kernel.org,
	cel@kernel.org,  linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, jlayton@kernel.org
Subject: Re: warning in nfsd4_cb_done
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 16:35:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250210-b219737c10-80a0d6c000db@bugzilla.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250204-b219737c8-56e36733bccb@bugzilla.kernel.org>

Jeff Layton writes via Kernel.org Bugzilla:

(In reply to Chuck Lever from comment #8)
> (In reply to rik.theys from comment #7)
> > Is it possible this patch has not (yet) been sent to stable@vger.kernel.org
> > so it ends up in 6.12.y?
> 
> Commit 1b3e26a5ccbf has been in a publicly released kernel for exactly two
> days (as of this writing). It will take some time before it appears in any
> LTS kernel. For now, if you would like to test the commit, you need to apply
> it manually.

Now that I look, 1b3e26a5ccbf is wrong. The patch on the ml was correct, but the one that got committed is different. It should be:

    status = decode_cb_op_status(xdr, OP_CB_GETATTR, &cb->cb_status);
    if (unlikely(status || cb->cb_status))

If "status" is non-zero, decoding failed (usu. BADXDR), but we also want to bail out and not decode the rest of the call if the decoded cb_status is non-zero. That's not happening here, cb_seq_status has already been checked and is non-zero, so this ends up trying to decode the rest of the CB_GETATTR reply when it doesn't exist.

View: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219737#c10
You can reply to this message to join the discussion.
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
Kernel.org Bugzilla (bugspray 0.1-dev)


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-10 16:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-30 14:05 warning in nfsd4_cb_done rik.theys via Bugspray Bot
2025-01-30 14:10 ` Chuck Lever via Bugspray Bot
2025-01-30 15:08   ` Olga Kornievskaia
2025-01-30 15:20     ` Chuck Lever via Bugspray Bot
2025-01-30 15:20       ` Chuck Lever via Bugspray Bot
2025-01-30 15:55       ` Chuck Lever via Bugspray Bot
2025-01-30 14:20 ` rik.theys via Bugspray Bot
2025-02-04 13:30 ` rik.theys via Bugspray Bot
2025-02-04 13:30   ` Chuck Lever via Bugspray Bot
2025-02-10 15:03     ` Olga Kornievskaia
2025-02-10 16:35     ` Jeff Layton via Bugspray Bot [this message]
2025-02-10 15:45 ` Jeff Layton via Bugspray Bot
2025-02-10 16:45 ` Chuck Lever via Bugspray Bot
2025-02-24 11:55 ` rik.theys via Bugspray Bot
2025-02-24 12:20 ` Jeff Layton via Bugspray Bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250210-b219737c10-80a0d6c000db@bugzilla.kernel.org \
    --to=bugbot@kernel.org \
    --cc=aglo@umich.edu \
    --cc=anna@kernel.org \
    --cc=cel@kernel.org \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trondmy@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox