From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@redhat.com>,
Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6 RFC v2] nfsd: allocate/free session-based DRC slots on demand
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:31:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2424176e3b8463abbfd532e05101329b2301f287.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241119004928.3245873-1-neilb@suse.de>
On Tue, 2024-11-19 at 11:41 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> Here is v2 of my series for on-demand allocation and freeing of session DRC slots.
>
> - Now uses an xarray to store slots, and the limit is raised to 2048
> - delays retiring a slot until the client has confirmed that it isn't
> using it as described in RFC:
>
> The replier SHOULD retain the slots it wants to retire until the
> requester sends a request with a highest_slotid less than or equal
> to the replier's new enforced highest_slotid.
>
> - When a retired slot is used, allow the seqid to be the next in sequence
> as required by the RFC:
>
> Each time a slot is reused, the request MUST specify a sequence
> ID that is one greater than that of the previous request on the
> slot.
>
> or "1" as (arguably) allowed by the RFC:
>
> The first time a slot is used, the requester MUST specify a
> sequence ID of one
>
I thought that the conclusion of the IETF discussion was that we should
reset this to 1. It'd be ideal to just do that, as then we wouldn't
need NFSD4_SLOT_REUSED.
Are there any clients that expect to reuse the old seqid in this
situation? I know the Linux client doesn't. Do Solaris or FreeBSD?
> - current slot allocation is now reported in /proc/fs/nfsd/clients/*/info
>
> This has been tested with highly aggressive shrinker settings:
> nfsd_slot_shrinker->seeks = 0;
> nfsd_slot_shrinker->batch = 2;
>
> and with periodic "echo 3 > drop_caches". The slot count drops as
> expected and then increases again.
>
This is really great work, Neil!
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-19 21:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-19 0:41 [PATCH 0/6 RFC v2] nfsd: allocate/free session-based DRC slots on demand NeilBrown
2024-11-19 0:41 ` [PATCH 1/6] nfsd: use an xarray to store v4.1 session slots NeilBrown
2024-11-19 0:41 ` [PATCH 2/6] nfsd: remove artificial limits on the session-based DRC NeilBrown
2024-11-19 0:41 ` [PATCH 3/6] nfsd: add session slot count to /proc/fs/nfsd/clients/*/info NeilBrown
2024-11-19 19:14 ` Chuck Lever
2024-11-19 22:22 ` NeilBrown
2024-11-20 0:21 ` Chuck Lever
2024-11-19 19:21 ` Chuck Lever
2024-11-19 22:24 ` NeilBrown
2024-11-20 0:25 ` Chuck Lever
2024-11-21 21:03 ` NeilBrown
2024-11-21 21:24 ` Chuck Lever III
2024-11-19 0:41 ` [PATCH 4/6] nfsd: allocate new session-based DRC slots on demand NeilBrown
2024-11-19 19:20 ` Chuck Lever
2024-11-19 22:27 ` NeilBrown
2024-11-20 0:32 ` Chuck Lever
2024-11-21 21:20 ` NeilBrown
2024-11-19 19:34 ` Jeff Layton
2024-11-19 0:41 ` [PATCH 5/6] nfsd: add support for freeing unused session-DRC slots NeilBrown
2024-11-19 19:25 ` Chuck Lever
2024-11-19 22:35 ` NeilBrown
2024-11-20 1:27 ` Chuck Lever
2024-11-21 21:47 ` NeilBrown
2024-11-21 22:29 ` Chuck Lever III
2024-12-02 16:11 ` Chuck Lever III
2024-12-03 4:28 ` NeilBrown
2024-12-03 14:40 ` Chuck Lever III
2024-11-19 19:48 ` Jeff Layton
2024-11-19 0:41 ` [PATCH 6/6] nfsd: add shrinker to reduce number of slots allocated per session NeilBrown
2024-11-19 19:28 ` Chuck Lever
2024-11-19 22:41 ` NeilBrown
2024-11-19 21:17 ` Jeff Layton
2024-11-19 22:47 ` NeilBrown
2024-11-19 21:31 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2024-11-19 22:52 ` [PATCH 0/6 RFC v2] nfsd: allocate/free session-based DRC slots on demand NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2424176e3b8463abbfd532e05101329b2301f287.camel@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox