* NFS rpc and stale handles on 2.6.x servers
@ 2004-01-26 1:03 hanasaki
2004-01-30 0:46 ` [NFS] " Neil Brown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: hanasaki @ 2004-01-26 1:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nfs
The below is being reported, on and off, when hitting nfs-kernel-servers
running on 2.6.0 and 2.6.1 Could someone tell me if this is smoe bug or
what? Thanks
RPC request reserved 0 but used 124
Debian sarge
nfs-kernel-server
am-untils
nfsv3 over tcp
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [NFS] NFS rpc and stale handles on 2.6.x servers
2004-01-26 1:03 NFS rpc and stale handles on 2.6.x servers hanasaki
@ 2004-01-30 0:46 ` Neil Brown
2004-01-30 1:25 ` Mike Fedyk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Neil Brown @ 2004-01-30 0:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: hanasaki; +Cc: nfs, linux-kernel
On Sunday January 25, hanasaki@hanaden.com wrote:
> The below is being reported, on and off, when hitting nfs-kernel-servers
> running on 2.6.0 and 2.6.1 Could someone tell me if this is smoe bug or
> what? Thanks
> RPC request reserved 0 but used 124
>
> Debian sarge
> nfs-kernel-server
> am-untils
> nfsv3 over tcp
>
stale file handles is a known bug that is fixed in the but BK and will
be in 2.6.3.
The "RPC request reserved 0 ..." is very odd. It does immediately
indicate a major problem, but it should be fixed, if only I could
figure out what was causing it.
I might put come more info into the message so future bug reports will
tell me more.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [NFS] NFS rpc and stale handles on 2.6.x servers
2004-01-30 0:46 ` [NFS] " Neil Brown
@ 2004-01-30 1:25 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-01-30 1:36 ` Neil Brown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mike Fedyk @ 2004-01-30 1:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Neil Brown; +Cc: hanasaki, nfs, linux-kernel
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:46:31AM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Sunday January 25, hanasaki@hanaden.com wrote:
> > The below is being reported, on and off, when hitting nfs-kernel-servers
> > running on 2.6.0 and 2.6.1 Could someone tell me if this is smoe bug or
> > what? Thanks
> > RPC request reserved 0 but used 124
> >
> > Debian sarge
> > nfs-kernel-server
> > am-untils
> > nfsv3 over tcp
> >
>
> stale file handles is a known bug that is fixed in the but BK and will
> be in 2.6.3.
do you mean 2.6.2?
I've merged the nfsd stale file handles into 2.6.1-bk2 and it is working
fine on a nfs server here...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [NFS] NFS rpc and stale handles on 2.6.x servers
2004-01-30 1:25 ` Mike Fedyk
@ 2004-01-30 1:36 ` Neil Brown
2004-01-30 2:11 ` hanasaki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Neil Brown @ 2004-01-30 1:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mike Fedyk; +Cc: hanasaki, nfs, linux-kernel
On Thursday January 29, mfedyk@matchmail.com wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:46:31AM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
> > On Sunday January 25, hanasaki@hanaden.com wrote:
> > > The below is being reported, on and off, when hitting nfs-kernel-servers
> > > running on 2.6.0 and 2.6.1 Could someone tell me if this is smoe bug or
> > > what? Thanks
> > > RPC request reserved 0 but used 124
> > >
> > > Debian sarge
> > > nfs-kernel-server
> > > am-untils
> > > nfsv3 over tcp
> > >
> >
> > stale file handles is a known bug that is fixed in the but BK and will
> > be in 2.6.3.
>
> do you mean 2.6.2?
Yeh, 2.6.2 as well.. But definitely 2.6.3 :-)
>
> I've merged the nfsd stale file handles into 2.6.1-bk2 and it is working
> fine on a nfs server here...
good, thanks.
NeilBrown
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [NFS] NFS rpc and stale handles on 2.6.x servers
2004-01-30 1:36 ` Neil Brown
@ 2004-01-30 2:11 ` hanasaki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: hanasaki @ 2004-01-30 2:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Neil Brown; +Cc: Mike Fedyk, nfs, linux-kernel
Add this to your exportfs "no_subtree_check" It seems to be a temp
workaround. Searching the web, the only issue with this option seems to
be a minor performance hit (big issue for large systems). Any chance of
getting the patch 2.6.2? www.kernel.org looks like its still on an RC2
of this.
Neil Brown wrote:
> On Thursday January 29, mfedyk@matchmail.com wrote:
>
>>On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:46:31AM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
>>
>>>On Sunday January 25, hanasaki@hanaden.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>The below is being reported, on and off, when hitting nfs-kernel-servers
>>>>running on 2.6.0 and 2.6.1 Could someone tell me if this is smoe bug or
>>>>what? Thanks
>>>> RPC request reserved 0 but used 124
>>>>
>>>>Debian sarge
>>>>nfs-kernel-server
>>>>am-untils
>>>>nfsv3 over tcp
>>>>
>>>
>>>stale file handles is a known bug that is fixed in the but BK and will
>>>be in 2.6.3.
>>
>>do you mean 2.6.2?
>
>
> Yeh, 2.6.2 as well.. But definitely 2.6.3 :-)
>
>
>>I've merged the nfsd stale file handles into 2.6.1-bk2 and it is working
>>fine on a nfs server here...
>
>
> good, thanks.
> NeilBrown
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-01-30 2:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-01-26 1:03 NFS rpc and stale handles on 2.6.x servers hanasaki
2004-01-30 0:46 ` [NFS] " Neil Brown
2004-01-30 1:25 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-01-30 1:36 ` Neil Brown
2004-01-30 2:11 ` hanasaki
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox