[PATCH] nfs: parenthesize NFS_*(inode) parameters

[PATCH] nfs: parenthesize NFS_*(inode) parameters

[Benny Halevy]

Otherwise e.g., NFS_SERVER(&nfsi->vfs_inode) does not compile.

Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
---
 include/linux/nfs_fs.h |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/nfs_fs.h b/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
index 0477a4c..5a5d3fe 100644
--- a/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
@@ -221,10 +221,10 @@ static inline struct nfs_inode *NFS_I(struct inode *inode)
 {
 	return container_of(inode, struct nfs_inode, vfs_inode);
 }
-#define NFS_SB(s)		((struct nfs_server *)(s->s_fs_info))
+#define NFS_SB(s)		((struct nfs_server *)((s)->s_fs_info))
 
 #define NFS_FH(inode)			(&NFS_I(inode)->fh)
-#define NFS_SERVER(inode)		(NFS_SB(inode->i_sb))
+#define NFS_SERVER(inode)		(NFS_SB((inode)->i_sb))
 #define NFS_CLIENT(inode)		(NFS_SERVER(inode)->client)
 #define NFS_PROTO(inode)		(NFS_SERVER(inode)->nfs_client->rpc_ops)
 #define NFS_COOKIEVERF(inode)		(NFS_I(inode)->cookieverf)
-- 
1.5.3.3

Re: [PATCH] nfs: parenthesize NFS_*(inode) parameters

[Trond Myklebust]

On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 16:28 +0200, Benny Halevy wrote:
> Otherwise e.g., NFS_SERVER(&nfsi->vfs_inode) does not compile.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/nfs_fs.h |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/nfs_fs.h b/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
> index 0477a4c..5a5d3fe 100644
> --- a/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
> @@ -221,10 +221,10 @@ static inline struct nfs_inode *NFS_I(struct inode *inode)
>  {
>  	return container_of(inode, struct nfs_inode, vfs_inode);
>  }
> -#define NFS_SB(s)		((struct nfs_server *)(s->s_fs_info))
> +#define NFS_SB(s)		((struct nfs_server *)((s)->s_fs_info))
>  
>  #define NFS_FH(inode)			(&NFS_I(inode)->fh)
> -#define NFS_SERVER(inode)		(NFS_SB(inode->i_sb))
> +#define NFS_SERVER(inode)		(NFS_SB((inode)->i_sb))
>  #define NFS_CLIENT(inode)		(NFS_SERVER(inode)->client)
>  #define NFS_PROTO(inode)		(NFS_SERVER(inode)->nfs_client->rpc_ops)
>  #define NFS_COOKIEVERF(inode)		(NFS_I(inode)->cookieverf)

They should really be converted into inlined functions.

Cheers
  Trond

Re: [PATCH] nfs: parenthesize NFS_*(inode) parameters

[Benny Halevy]

On Jan. 22, 2008, 16:50 +0200, Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 16:28 +0200, Benny Halevy wrote:
>> Otherwise e.g., NFS_SERVER(&nfsi->vfs_inode) does not compile.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
>> ---
>>  include/linux/nfs_fs.h |    4 ++--
>>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/nfs_fs.h b/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
>> index 0477a4c..5a5d3fe 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
>> @@ -221,10 +221,10 @@ static inline struct nfs_inode *NFS_I(struct inode *inode)
>>  {
>>  	return container_of(inode, struct nfs_inode, vfs_inode);
>>  }
>> -#define NFS_SB(s)		((struct nfs_server *)(s->s_fs_info))
>> +#define NFS_SB(s)		((struct nfs_server *)((s)->s_fs_info))
>>  
>>  #define NFS_FH(inode)			(&NFS_I(inode)->fh)
>> -#define NFS_SERVER(inode)		(NFS_SB(inode->i_sb))
>> +#define NFS_SERVER(inode)		(NFS_SB((inode)->i_sb))
>>  #define NFS_CLIENT(inode)		(NFS_SERVER(inode)->client)
>>  #define NFS_PROTO(inode)		(NFS_SERVER(inode)->nfs_client->rpc_ops)
>>  #define NFS_COOKIEVERF(inode)		(NFS_I(inode)->cookieverf)
> 
> They should really be converted into inlined functions.
> 
> Cheers
>   Trond

Agreed.  How about the following:
---
[PATCH] nfs: convert NFS_*(inode) helpers to static inline

Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
---
(Patch passes all connectathon tests)

 fs/nfs/dir.c           |    8 ++--
 fs/nfs/inode.c         |    8 ++--
 fs/nfs/read.c          |    2 +-
 include/linux/nfs_fs.h |   78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 4 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/dir.c b/fs/nfs/dir.c
index f697b5c..7b64c22 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/dir.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/dir.c
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ int nfs_readdir_filler(nfs_readdir_descriptor_t *desc, struct page *page)
 		/* We requested READDIRPLUS, but the server doesn't grok it */
 		if (error == -ENOTSUPP && desc->plus) {
 			NFS_SERVER(inode)->caps &= ~NFS_CAP_READDIRPLUS;
-			clear_bit(NFS_INO_ADVISE_RDPLUS, &NFS_FLAGS(inode));
+			clear_bit(NFS_INO_ADVISE_RDPLUS, NFS_FLAGSP(inode));
 			desc->plus = 0;
 			goto again;
 		}
@@ -579,7 +579,7 @@ static int nfs_readdir(struct file *filp, void *dirent, filldir_t filldir)
 			break;
 		}
 		if (res == -ETOOSMALL && desc->plus) {
-			clear_bit(NFS_INO_ADVISE_RDPLUS, &NFS_FLAGS(inode));
+			clear_bit(NFS_INO_ADVISE_RDPLUS, NFS_FLAGSP(inode));
 			nfs_zap_caches(inode);
 			desc->plus = 0;
 			desc->entry->eof = 0;
@@ -1731,7 +1731,7 @@ static void __nfs_access_zap_cache(struct inode *inode)
 void nfs_access_zap_cache(struct inode *inode)
 {
 	/* Remove from global LRU init */
-	if (test_and_clear_bit(NFS_INO_ACL_LRU_SET, &NFS_FLAGS(inode))) {
+	if (test_and_clear_bit(NFS_INO_ACL_LRU_SET, NFS_FLAGSP(inode))) {
 		spin_lock(&nfs_access_lru_lock);
 		list_del_init(&NFS_I(inode)->access_cache_inode_lru);
 		spin_unlock(&nfs_access_lru_lock);
@@ -1845,7 +1845,7 @@ static void nfs_access_add_cache(struct inode *inode, struct nfs_access_entry *s
 	smp_mb__after_atomic_inc();
 
 	/* Add inode to global LRU list */
-	if (!test_and_set_bit(NFS_INO_ACL_LRU_SET, &NFS_FLAGS(inode))) {
+	if (!test_and_set_bit(NFS_INO_ACL_LRU_SET, NFS_FLAGSP(inode))) {
 		spin_lock(&nfs_access_lru_lock);
 		list_add_tail(&NFS_I(inode)->access_cache_inode_lru, &nfs_access_lru_list);
 		spin_unlock(&nfs_access_lru_lock);
diff --git a/fs/nfs/inode.c b/fs/nfs/inode.c
index db5d96d..9c5e6f7 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/inode.c
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ void nfs_invalidate_atime(struct inode *inode)
  */
 static void nfs_invalidate_inode(struct inode *inode)
 {
-	set_bit(NFS_INO_STALE, &NFS_FLAGS(inode));
+	set_bit(NFS_INO_STALE, NFS_FLAGSP(inode));
 	nfs_zap_caches_locked(inode);
 }
 
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ nfs_init_locked(struct inode *inode, void *opaque)
 	struct nfs_find_desc	*desc = (struct nfs_find_desc *)opaque;
 	struct nfs_fattr	*fattr = desc->fattr;
 
-	NFS_FILEID(inode) = fattr->fileid;
+	set_nfs_fileid(inode, fattr->fileid);
 	nfs_copy_fh(NFS_FH(inode), desc->fh);
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ nfs_fhget(struct super_block *sb, struct nfs_fh *fh, struct nfs_fattr *fattr)
 			inode->i_fop = &nfs_dir_operations;
 			if (nfs_server_capable(inode, NFS_CAP_READDIRPLUS)
 			    && fattr->size <= NFS_LIMIT_READDIRPLUS)
-				set_bit(NFS_INO_ADVISE_RDPLUS, &NFS_FLAGS(inode));
+				set_bit(NFS_INO_ADVISE_RDPLUS, NFS_FLAGSP(inode));
 			/* Deal with crossing mountpoints */
 			if (!nfs_fsid_equal(&NFS_SB(sb)->fsid, &fattr->fsid)) {
 				if (fattr->valid & NFS_ATTR_FATTR_V4_REFERRAL)
@@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ __nfs_revalidate_inode(struct nfs_server *server, struct inode *inode)
 		if (status == -ESTALE) {
 			nfs_zap_caches(inode);
 			if (!S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode))
-				set_bit(NFS_INO_STALE, &NFS_FLAGS(inode));
+				set_bit(NFS_INO_STALE, NFS_FLAGSP(inode));
 		}
 		goto out;
 	}
diff --git a/fs/nfs/read.c b/fs/nfs/read.c
index 4587a86..02f2d36 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/read.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/read.c
@@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ int nfs_readpage_result(struct rpc_task *task, struct nfs_read_data *data)
 	nfs_add_stats(data->inode, NFSIOS_SERVERREADBYTES, data->res.count);
 
 	if (task->tk_status == -ESTALE) {
-		set_bit(NFS_INO_STALE, &NFS_FLAGS(data->inode));
+		set_bit(NFS_INO_STALE, NFS_FLAGSP(data->inode));
 		nfs_mark_for_revalidate(data->inode);
 	}
 	return 0;
diff --git a/include/linux/nfs_fs.h b/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
index 2d15d4a..98fd14c 100644
--- a/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
@@ -196,28 +196,72 @@ struct nfs_inode {
 #define NFS_INO_STALE		(2)		/* possible stale inode */
 #define NFS_INO_ACL_LRU_SET	(3)		/* Inode is on the LRU list */
 
-static inline struct nfs_inode *NFS_I(struct inode *inode)
+static inline struct nfs_inode *NFS_I(const struct inode *inode)
 {
 	return container_of(inode, struct nfs_inode, vfs_inode);
 }
-#define NFS_SB(s)		((struct nfs_server *)(s->s_fs_info))
 
-#define NFS_FH(inode)			(&NFS_I(inode)->fh)
-#define NFS_SERVER(inode)		(NFS_SB(inode->i_sb))
-#define NFS_CLIENT(inode)		(NFS_SERVER(inode)->client)
-#define NFS_PROTO(inode)		(NFS_SERVER(inode)->nfs_client->rpc_ops)
-#define NFS_COOKIEVERF(inode)		(NFS_I(inode)->cookieverf)
-#define NFS_MINATTRTIMEO(inode) \
-	(S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)? NFS_SERVER(inode)->acdirmin \
-			       : NFS_SERVER(inode)->acregmin)
-#define NFS_MAXATTRTIMEO(inode) \
-	(S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)? NFS_SERVER(inode)->acdirmax \
-			       : NFS_SERVER(inode)->acregmax)
+static inline struct nfs_server *NFS_SB(const struct super_block *s)
+{
+	return (struct nfs_server *)(s->s_fs_info);
+}
 
-#define NFS_FLAGS(inode)		(NFS_I(inode)->flags)
-#define NFS_STALE(inode)		(test_bit(NFS_INO_STALE, &NFS_FLAGS(inode)))
+static inline struct nfs_fh *NFS_FH(const struct inode *inode)
+{
+	return &NFS_I(inode)->fh;
+}
 
-#define NFS_FILEID(inode)		(NFS_I(inode)->fileid)
+static inline struct nfs_server *NFS_SERVER(const struct inode *inode)
+{
+	return NFS_SB(inode->i_sb);
+}
+
+static inline struct rpc_clnt *NFS_CLIENT(const struct inode *inode)
+{
+	return NFS_SERVER(inode)->client;
+}
+
+static inline const struct nfs_rpc_ops *NFS_PROTO(const struct inode *inode)
+{
+	return NFS_SERVER(inode)->nfs_client->rpc_ops;
+}
+
+static inline __be32 *NFS_COOKIEVERF(const struct inode *inode)
+{
+	return NFS_I(inode)->cookieverf;
+}
+
+static inline unsigned NFS_MINATTRTIMEO(const struct inode *inode)
+{
+	struct nfs_server *nfss = NFS_SERVER(inode);
+	return S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) ? nfss->acdirmin : nfss->acregmin;
+}
+
+static inline unsigned NFS_MAXATTRTIMEO(const struct inode *inode)
+{
+	struct nfs_server *nfss = NFS_SERVER(inode);
+	return S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) ? nfss->acdirmax : nfss->acregmax;
+}
+
+static inline unsigned long *NFS_FLAGSP(const struct inode *inode)
+{
+	return &NFS_I(inode)->flags;
+}
+
+static inline int NFS_STALE(const struct inode *inode)
+{
+	return test_bit(NFS_INO_STALE, NFS_FLAGSP(inode));
+}
+
+static inline __u64 NFS_FILEID(const struct inode *inode)
+{
+	return NFS_I(inode)->fileid;
+}
+
+static inline void set_nfs_fileid(struct inode *inode, __u64 fileid)
+{
+	NFS_I(inode)->fileid = fileid;
+}
 
 static inline void nfs_mark_for_revalidate(struct inode *inode)
 {
@@ -237,7 +281,7 @@ static inline int nfs_server_capable(struct inode *inode, int cap)
 
 static inline int NFS_USE_READDIRPLUS(struct inode *inode)
 {
-	return test_bit(NFS_INO_ADVISE_RDPLUS, &NFS_FLAGS(inode));
+	return test_bit(NFS_INO_ADVISE_RDPLUS, NFS_FLAGSP(inode));
 }
 
 static inline void nfs_set_verifier(struct dentry * dentry, unsigned long verf)

Re: [PATCH] nfs: parenthesize NFS_*(inode) parameters

[Chuck Lever]

Hi Benny-

On Jan 22, 2008, at 10:37 AM, Benny Halevy wrote:
> On Jan. 22, 2008, 16:50 +0200, Trond Myklebust  
> <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 16:28 +0200, Benny Halevy wrote:
>>> Otherwise e.g., NFS_SERVER(&nfsi->vfs_inode) does not compile.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
>>> ---
>>>  include/linux/nfs_fs.h |    4 ++--
>>>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/nfs_fs.h b/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
>>> index 0477a4c..5a5d3fe 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
>>> @@ -221,10 +221,10 @@ static inline struct nfs_inode *NFS_I 
>>> (struct inode *inode)
>>>  {
>>>  	return container_of(inode, struct nfs_inode, vfs_inode);
>>>  }
>>> -#define NFS_SB(s)		((struct nfs_server *)(s->s_fs_info))
>>> +#define NFS_SB(s)		((struct nfs_server *)((s)->s_fs_info))
>>>
>>>  #define NFS_FH(inode)			(&NFS_I(inode)->fh)
>>> -#define NFS_SERVER(inode)		(NFS_SB(inode->i_sb))
>>> +#define NFS_SERVER(inode)		(NFS_SB((inode)->i_sb))
>>>  #define NFS_CLIENT(inode)		(NFS_SERVER(inode)->client)
>>>  #define NFS_PROTO(inode)		(NFS_SERVER(inode)->nfs_client->rpc_ops)
>>>  #define NFS_COOKIEVERF(inode)		(NFS_I(inode)->cookieverf)
>>
>> They should really be converted into inlined functions.
>>
>> Cheers
>>   Trond
>
> Agreed.  How about the following:
> ---
> [PATCH] nfs: convert NFS_*(inode) helpers to static inline
>
> Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
> ---
> (Patch passes all connectathon tests)
>
>  fs/nfs/dir.c           |    8 ++--
>  fs/nfs/inode.c         |    8 ++--
>  fs/nfs/read.c          |    2 +-
>  include/linux/nfs_fs.h |   78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 
> +----------
>  4 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/dir.c b/fs/nfs/dir.c
> index f697b5c..7b64c22 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/dir.c
> @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ int nfs_readdir_filler(nfs_readdir_descriptor_t  
> *desc, struct page *page)
>  		/* We requested READDIRPLUS, but the server doesn't grok it */
>  		if (error == -ENOTSUPP && desc->plus) {
>  			NFS_SERVER(inode)->caps &= ~NFS_CAP_READDIRPLUS;
> -			clear_bit(NFS_INO_ADVISE_RDPLUS, &NFS_FLAGS(inode));
> +			clear_bit(NFS_INO_ADVISE_RDPLUS, NFS_FLAGSP(inode));

Since you already have NFS_USE_READDIRPLUS defined below, maybe the  
equivalent clear_bit functionality can also be an inlined function.   
It is even used in more than one place.

I feel like NFS_FLAGSP (returning a pointer) is somewhat awkward, but  
that's just my taste I suppose.

>  			desc->plus = 0;
>  			goto again;
>  		}
> @@ -579,7 +579,7 @@ static int nfs_readdir(struct file *filp, void  
> *dirent, filldir_t filldir)
>  			break;
>  		}
>  		if (res == -ETOOSMALL && desc->plus) {
> -			clear_bit(NFS_INO_ADVISE_RDPLUS, &NFS_FLAGS(inode));
> +			clear_bit(NFS_INO_ADVISE_RDPLUS, NFS_FLAGSP(inode));
>  			nfs_zap_caches(inode);
>  			desc->plus = 0;
>  			desc->entry->eof = 0;
> @@ -1731,7 +1731,7 @@ static void __nfs_access_zap_cache(struct  
> inode *inode)
>  void nfs_access_zap_cache(struct inode *inode)
>  {
>  	/* Remove from global LRU init */
> -	if (test_and_clear_bit(NFS_INO_ACL_LRU_SET, &NFS_FLAGS(inode))) {
> +	if (test_and_clear_bit(NFS_INO_ACL_LRU_SET, NFS_FLAGSP(inode))) {
>  		spin_lock(&nfs_access_lru_lock);
>  		list_del_init(&NFS_I(inode)->access_cache_inode_lru);
>  		spin_unlock(&nfs_access_lru_lock);
> @@ -1845,7 +1845,7 @@ static void nfs_access_add_cache(struct inode  
> *inode, struct nfs_access_entry *s
>  	smp_mb__after_atomic_inc();
>
>  	/* Add inode to global LRU list */
> -	if (!test_and_set_bit(NFS_INO_ACL_LRU_SET, &NFS_FLAGS(inode))) {
> +	if (!test_and_set_bit(NFS_INO_ACL_LRU_SET, NFS_FLAGSP(inode))) {
>  		spin_lock(&nfs_access_lru_lock);
>  		list_add_tail(&NFS_I(inode)->access_cache_inode_lru,  
> &nfs_access_lru_list);
>  		spin_unlock(&nfs_access_lru_lock);
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/inode.c b/fs/nfs/inode.c
> index db5d96d..9c5e6f7 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/inode.c
> @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ void nfs_invalidate_atime(struct inode *inode)
>   */
>  static void nfs_invalidate_inode(struct inode *inode)
>  {
> -	set_bit(NFS_INO_STALE, &NFS_FLAGS(inode));
> +	set_bit(NFS_INO_STALE, NFS_FLAGSP(inode));

Likewise for NFS_INO_STALE... A separate inline for setting  
NFS_INO_STALE might be a little nicer.

>  	nfs_zap_caches_locked(inode);
>  }
>
> @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ nfs_init_locked(struct inode *inode, void *opaque)
>  	struct nfs_find_desc	*desc = (struct nfs_find_desc *)opaque;
>  	struct nfs_fattr	*fattr = desc->fattr;
>
> -	NFS_FILEID(inode) = fattr->fileid;
> +	set_nfs_fileid(inode, fattr->fileid);
>  	nfs_copy_fh(NFS_FH(inode), desc->fh);
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ nfs_fhget(struct super_block *sb, struct nfs_fh  
> *fh, struct nfs_fattr *fattr)
>  			inode->i_fop = &nfs_dir_operations;
>  			if (nfs_server_capable(inode, NFS_CAP_READDIRPLUS)
>  			    && fattr->size <= NFS_LIMIT_READDIRPLUS)
> -				set_bit(NFS_INO_ADVISE_RDPLUS, &NFS_FLAGS(inode));
> +				set_bit(NFS_INO_ADVISE_RDPLUS, NFS_FLAGSP(inode));

And for setting NFS_INO_ADVISE_RDPLUS.

>  			/* Deal with crossing mountpoints */
>  			if (!nfs_fsid_equal(&NFS_SB(sb)->fsid, &fattr->fsid)) {
>  				if (fattr->valid & NFS_ATTR_FATTR_V4_REFERRAL)
> @@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ __nfs_revalidate_inode(struct nfs_server  
> *server, struct inode *inode)
>  		if (status == -ESTALE) {
>  			nfs_zap_caches(inode);
>  			if (!S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode))
> -				set_bit(NFS_INO_STALE, &NFS_FLAGS(inode));
> +				set_bit(NFS_INO_STALE, NFS_FLAGSP(inode));
>  		}
>  		goto out;
>  	}
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/read.c b/fs/nfs/read.c
> index 4587a86..02f2d36 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/read.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/read.c
> @@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ int nfs_readpage_result(struct rpc_task *task,  
> struct nfs_read_data *data)
>  	nfs_add_stats(data->inode, NFSIOS_SERVERREADBYTES, data->res.count);
>
>  	if (task->tk_status == -ESTALE) {
> -		set_bit(NFS_INO_STALE, &NFS_FLAGS(data->inode));
> +		set_bit(NFS_INO_STALE, NFS_FLAGSP(data->inode));
>  		nfs_mark_for_revalidate(data->inode);
>  	}
>  	return 0;
> diff --git a/include/linux/nfs_fs.h b/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
> index 2d15d4a..98fd14c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
> @@ -196,28 +196,72 @@ struct nfs_inode {
>  #define NFS_INO_STALE		(2)		/* possible stale inode */
>  #define NFS_INO_ACL_LRU_SET	(3)		/* Inode is on the LRU list */
>
> -static inline struct nfs_inode *NFS_I(struct inode *inode)
> +static inline struct nfs_inode *NFS_I(const struct inode *inode)
>  {
>  	return container_of(inode, struct nfs_inode, vfs_inode);
>  }
> -#define NFS_SB(s)		((struct nfs_server *)(s->s_fs_info))
>
> -#define NFS_FH(inode)			(&NFS_I(inode)->fh)
> -#define NFS_SERVER(inode)		(NFS_SB(inode->i_sb))
> -#define NFS_CLIENT(inode)		(NFS_SERVER(inode)->client)
> -#define NFS_PROTO(inode)		(NFS_SERVER(inode)->nfs_client->rpc_ops)
> -#define NFS_COOKIEVERF(inode)		(NFS_I(inode)->cookieverf)
> -#define NFS_MINATTRTIMEO(inode) \
> -	(S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)? NFS_SERVER(inode)->acdirmin \
> -			       : NFS_SERVER(inode)->acregmin)
> -#define NFS_MAXATTRTIMEO(inode) \
> -	(S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)? NFS_SERVER(inode)->acdirmax \
> -			       : NFS_SERVER(inode)->acregmax)
> +static inline struct nfs_server *NFS_SB(const struct super_block *s)
> +{
> +	return (struct nfs_server *)(s->s_fs_info);
> +}
>
> -#define NFS_FLAGS(inode)		(NFS_I(inode)->flags)
> -#define NFS_STALE(inode)		(test_bit(NFS_INO_STALE, &NFS_FLAGS 
> (inode)))
> +static inline struct nfs_fh *NFS_FH(const struct inode *inode)
> +{
> +	return &NFS_I(inode)->fh;
> +}

Since these are no longer macros, maybe we should change the case of  
their names too.  I realize NFS_USE_READDIRPLUS has set a precedent,  
but perhaps it's an ugly one we should fix now.

>
> -#define NFS_FILEID(inode)		(NFS_I(inode)->fileid)
> +static inline struct nfs_server *NFS_SERVER(const struct inode  
> *inode)
> +{
> +	return NFS_SB(inode->i_sb);
> +}
> +
> +static inline struct rpc_clnt *NFS_CLIENT(const struct inode *inode)
> +{
> +	return NFS_SERVER(inode)->client;
> +}
> +
> +static inline const struct nfs_rpc_ops *NFS_PROTO(const struct  
> inode *inode)
> +{
> +	return NFS_SERVER(inode)->nfs_client->rpc_ops;
> +}
> +
> +static inline __be32 *NFS_COOKIEVERF(const struct inode *inode)
> +{
> +	return NFS_I(inode)->cookieverf;
> +}
> +
> +static inline unsigned NFS_MINATTRTIMEO(const struct inode *inode)
> +{
> +	struct nfs_server *nfss = NFS_SERVER(inode);
> +	return S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) ? nfss->acdirmin : nfss->acregmin;
> +}
> +
> +static inline unsigned NFS_MAXATTRTIMEO(const struct inode *inode)
> +{
> +	struct nfs_server *nfss = NFS_SERVER(inode);
> +	return S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) ? nfss->acdirmax : nfss->acregmax;
> +}
> +
> +static inline unsigned long *NFS_FLAGSP(const struct inode *inode)
> +{
> +	return &NFS_I(inode)->flags;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int NFS_STALE(const struct inode *inode)
> +{
> +	return test_bit(NFS_INO_STALE, NFS_FLAGSP(inode));
> +}
> +
> +static inline __u64 NFS_FILEID(const struct inode *inode)
> +{
> +	return NFS_I(inode)->fileid;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void set_nfs_fileid(struct inode *inode, __u64 fileid)
> +{
> +	NFS_I(inode)->fileid = fileid;
> +}
>
>  static inline void nfs_mark_for_revalidate(struct inode *inode)
>  {
> @@ -237,7 +281,7 @@ static inline int nfs_server_capable(struct  
> inode *inode, int cap)
>
>  static inline int NFS_USE_READDIRPLUS(struct inode *inode)
>  {
> -	return test_bit(NFS_INO_ADVISE_RDPLUS, &NFS_FLAGS(inode));
> +	return test_bit(NFS_INO_ADVISE_RDPLUS, NFS_FLAGSP(inode));
>  }
>
>  static inline void nfs_set_verifier(struct dentry * dentry,  
> unsigned long verf)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NFSv4 mailing list
> NFSv4@linux-nfs.org
> http://linux-nfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4

--
Chuck Lever
chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com

Re: [PATCH] nfs: parenthesize NFS_*(inode) parameters

[Trond Myklebust]

On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 11:58 -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
> Hi Benny-
> 
> On Jan 22, 2008, at 10:37 AM, Benny Halevy wrote:
> > On Jan. 22, 2008, 16:50 +0200, Trond Myklebust  
> > <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 16:28 +0200, Benny Halevy wrote:
> >>> Otherwise e.g., NFS_SERVER(&nfsi->vfs_inode) does not compile.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>  include/linux/nfs_fs.h |    4 ++--
> >>>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/include/linux/nfs_fs.h b/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
> >>> index 0477a4c..5a5d3fe 100644
> >>> --- a/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
> >>> +++ b/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
> >>> @@ -221,10 +221,10 @@ static inline struct nfs_inode *NFS_I 
> >>> (struct inode *inode)
> >>>  {
> >>>  	return container_of(inode, struct nfs_inode, vfs_inode);
> >>>  }
> >>> -#define NFS_SB(s)		((struct nfs_server *)(s->s_fs_info))
> >>> +#define NFS_SB(s)		((struct nfs_server *)((s)->s_fs_info))
> >>>
> >>>  #define NFS_FH(inode)			(&NFS_I(inode)->fh)
> >>> -#define NFS_SERVER(inode)		(NFS_SB(inode->i_sb))
> >>> +#define NFS_SERVER(inode)		(NFS_SB((inode)->i_sb))
> >>>  #define NFS_CLIENT(inode)		(NFS_SERVER(inode)->client)
> >>>  #define NFS_PROTO(inode)		(NFS_SERVER(inode)->nfs_client->rpc_ops)
> >>>  #define NFS_COOKIEVERF(inode)		(NFS_I(inode)->cookieverf)
> >>
> >> They should really be converted into inlined functions.
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >>   Trond
> >
> > Agreed.  How about the following:
> > ---
> > [PATCH] nfs: convert NFS_*(inode) helpers to static inline
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
> > ---
> > (Patch passes all connectathon tests)
> >
> >  fs/nfs/dir.c           |    8 ++--
> >  fs/nfs/inode.c         |    8 ++--
> >  fs/nfs/read.c          |    2 +-
> >  include/linux/nfs_fs.h |   78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 
> > +----------
> >  4 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/nfs/dir.c b/fs/nfs/dir.c
> > index f697b5c..7b64c22 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfs/dir.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfs/dir.c
> > @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ int nfs_readdir_filler(nfs_readdir_descriptor_t  
> > *desc, struct page *page)
> >  		/* We requested READDIRPLUS, but the server doesn't grok it */
> >  		if (error == -ENOTSUPP && desc->plus) {
> >  			NFS_SERVER(inode)->caps &= ~NFS_CAP_READDIRPLUS;
> > -			clear_bit(NFS_INO_ADVISE_RDPLUS, &NFS_FLAGS(inode));
> > +			clear_bit(NFS_INO_ADVISE_RDPLUS, NFS_FLAGSP(inode));
> 
> Since you already have NFS_USE_READDIRPLUS defined below, maybe the  
> equivalent clear_bit functionality can also be an inlined function.   
> It is even used in more than one place.

I disagree. The inlined wrapper adds nothing but obfuscation in this
case. It would be different if you needed memory barriers, but that is
not the case here.

> I feel like NFS_FLAGSP (returning a pointer) is somewhat awkward, but  
> that's just my taste I suppose.

Ideally, we should get rid of NFS_FLAGS()/NFS_FLAGSP(). That too is just
obfuscating the code for no good reason.

> >  static void nfs_invalidate_inode(struct inode *inode)
> >  {
> > -	set_bit(NFS_INO_STALE, &NFS_FLAGS(inode));
> > +	set_bit(NFS_INO_STALE, NFS_FLAGSP(inode));
> 
> Likewise for NFS_INO_STALE... A separate inline for setting  
> NFS_INO_STALE might be a little nicer.

Not an inline. Just convert the existing nfs_invalidate_inode() into an
nfs_invalidate_inode_locked(), and add a version that takes the lock.

> >  	nfs_zap_caches_locked(inode);
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ nfs_init_locked(struct inode *inode, void *opaque)
> >  	struct nfs_find_desc	*desc = (struct nfs_find_desc *)opaque;
> >  	struct nfs_fattr	*fattr = desc->fattr;
> >
> > -	NFS_FILEID(inode) = fattr->fileid;
> > +	set_nfs_fileid(inode, fattr->fileid);
> >  	nfs_copy_fh(NFS_FH(inode), desc->fh);
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> > @@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ nfs_fhget(struct super_block *sb, struct nfs_fh  
> > *fh, struct nfs_fattr *fattr)
> >  			inode->i_fop = &nfs_dir_operations;
> >  			if (nfs_server_capable(inode, NFS_CAP_READDIRPLUS)
> >  			    && fattr->size <= NFS_LIMIT_READDIRPLUS)
> > -				set_bit(NFS_INO_ADVISE_RDPLUS, &NFS_FLAGS(inode));
> > +				set_bit(NFS_INO_ADVISE_RDPLUS, NFS_FLAGSP(inode));
> 
> And for setting NFS_INO_ADVISE_RDPLUS.

Again, why?

> > (inode)))
> > +static inline struct nfs_fh *NFS_FH(const struct inode *inode)
> > +{
> > +	return &NFS_I(inode)->fh;
> > +}
> 
> Since these are no longer macros, maybe we should change the case of  
> their names too.  I realize NFS_USE_READDIRPLUS has set a precedent,  
> but perhaps it's an ugly one we should fix now.

Changing NFS_I() would break with a common practice that is shared with
almost all filesystems. See, for instance, EXT3_I(), REISERFS_I(),
XFS_I(),...


Trond

Re: [PATCH] nfs: parenthesize NFS_*(inode) parameters

[Benny Halevy]

On Jan. 22, 2008, 20:10 +0200, Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 11:58 -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
>> Hi Benny-
>>
>> On Jan 22, 2008, at 10:37 AM, Benny Halevy wrote:
>>> On Jan. 22, 2008, 16:50 +0200, Trond Myklebust  
>>> <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 16:28 +0200, Benny Halevy wrote:
>>>>> Otherwise e.g., NFS_SERVER(&nfsi->vfs_inode) does not compile.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  include/linux/nfs_fs.h |    4 ++--
>>>>>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/nfs_fs.h b/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
>>>>> index 0477a4c..5a5d3fe 100644
>>>>> --- a/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
>>>>> +++ b/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
>>>>> @@ -221,10 +221,10 @@ static inline struct nfs_inode *NFS_I 
>>>>> (struct inode *inode)
>>>>>  {
>>>>>  	return container_of(inode, struct nfs_inode, vfs_inode);
>>>>>  }
>>>>> -#define NFS_SB(s)		((struct nfs_server *)(s->s_fs_info))
>>>>> +#define NFS_SB(s)		((struct nfs_server *)((s)->s_fs_info))
>>>>>
>>>>>  #define NFS_FH(inode)			(&NFS_I(inode)->fh)
>>>>> -#define NFS_SERVER(inode)		(NFS_SB(inode->i_sb))
>>>>> +#define NFS_SERVER(inode)		(NFS_SB((inode)->i_sb))
>>>>>  #define NFS_CLIENT(inode)		(NFS_SERVER(inode)->client)
>>>>>  #define NFS_PROTO(inode)		(NFS_SERVER(inode)->nfs_client->rpc_ops)
>>>>>  #define NFS_COOKIEVERF(inode)		(NFS_I(inode)->cookieverf)
>>>> They should really be converted into inlined functions.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>>   Trond
>>> Agreed.  How about the following:
>>> ---
>>> [PATCH] nfs: convert NFS_*(inode) helpers to static inline
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
>>> ---
>>> (Patch passes all connectathon tests)
>>>
>>>  fs/nfs/dir.c           |    8 ++--
>>>  fs/nfs/inode.c         |    8 ++--
>>>  fs/nfs/read.c          |    2 +-
>>>  include/linux/nfs_fs.h |   78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 
>>> +----------
>>>  4 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/nfs/dir.c b/fs/nfs/dir.c
>>> index f697b5c..7b64c22 100644
>>> --- a/fs/nfs/dir.c
>>> +++ b/fs/nfs/dir.c
>>> @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ int nfs_readdir_filler(nfs_readdir_descriptor_t  
>>> *desc, struct page *page)
>>>  		/* We requested READDIRPLUS, but the server doesn't grok it */
>>>  		if (error == -ENOTSUPP && desc->plus) {
>>>  			NFS_SERVER(inode)->caps &= ~NFS_CAP_READDIRPLUS;
>>> -			clear_bit(NFS_INO_ADVISE_RDPLUS, &NFS_FLAGS(inode));
>>> +			clear_bit(NFS_INO_ADVISE_RDPLUS, NFS_FLAGSP(inode));
>> Since you already have NFS_USE_READDIRPLUS defined below, maybe the  
>> equivalent clear_bit functionality can also be an inlined function.   
>> It is even used in more than one place.
> 
> I disagree. The inlined wrapper adds nothing but obfuscation in this
> case. It would be different if you needed memory barriers, but that is
> not the case here.
> 
>> I feel like NFS_FLAGSP (returning a pointer) is somewhat awkward, but  
>> that's just my taste I suppose.
> 
> Ideally, we should get rid of NFS_FLAGS()/NFS_FLAGSP(). That too is just
> obfuscating the code for no good reason.

I completely agree that NFS_FLAGSP is ugly.
Initially I thought of changing &NFS_FLAGS(inode) to &NFS_I(inode)->flags
and get rid of NFS_FLAGS, but I deferred to the most minimal change.
Let me know if you want me to do that.

> 
>>>  static void nfs_invalidate_inode(struct inode *inode)
>>>  {
>>> -	set_bit(NFS_INO_STALE, &NFS_FLAGS(inode));
>>> +	set_bit(NFS_INO_STALE, NFS_FLAGSP(inode));
>> Likewise for NFS_INO_STALE... A separate inline for setting  
>> NFS_INO_STALE might be a little nicer.
> 
> Not an inline. Just convert the existing nfs_invalidate_inode() into an
> nfs_invalidate_inode_locked(), and add a version that takes the lock.

I'm not sure I follow you...  All it does is setting the NFS_INO_STALE
bit and calling nfs_zap_caches_locked.  What use case is there for 
the unlocked case?

> 
>>>  	nfs_zap_caches_locked(inode);
>>>  }
>>>
>>> @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ nfs_init_locked(struct inode *inode, void *opaque)
>>>  	struct nfs_find_desc	*desc = (struct nfs_find_desc *)opaque;
>>>  	struct nfs_fattr	*fattr = desc->fattr;
>>>
>>> -	NFS_FILEID(inode) = fattr->fileid;
>>> +	set_nfs_fileid(inode, fattr->fileid);
>>>  	nfs_copy_fh(NFS_FH(inode), desc->fh);
>>>  	return 0;
>>>  }
>>> @@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ nfs_fhget(struct super_block *sb, struct nfs_fh  
>>> *fh, struct nfs_fattr *fattr)
>>>  			inode->i_fop = &nfs_dir_operations;
>>>  			if (nfs_server_capable(inode, NFS_CAP_READDIRPLUS)
>>>  			    && fattr->size <= NFS_LIMIT_READDIRPLUS)
>>> -				set_bit(NFS_INO_ADVISE_RDPLUS, &NFS_FLAGS(inode));
>>> +				set_bit(NFS_INO_ADVISE_RDPLUS, NFS_FLAGSP(inode));
>> And for setting NFS_INO_ADVISE_RDPLUS.
> 
> Again, why?

The only good reason I can think of is abstracting the API to allow a different
implementation in the future, but I see little benefits as for style or readability.

> 
>>> (inode)))
>>> +static inline struct nfs_fh *NFS_FH(const struct inode *inode)
>>> +{
>>> +	return &NFS_I(inode)->fh;
>>> +}
>> Since these are no longer macros, maybe we should change the case of  
>> their names too.  I realize NFS_USE_READDIRPLUS has set a precedent,  
>> but perhaps it's an ugly one we should fix now.
> 
> Changing NFS_I() would break with a common practice that is shared with
> almost all filesystems. See, for instance, EXT3_I(), REISERFS_I(),
> XFS_I(),...
> 
> 
> Trond

Re: [PATCH] nfs: parenthesize NFS_*(inode) parameters

[Trond Myklebust]

On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 20:30 +0200, Benny Halevy wrote:

> > Ideally, we should get rid of NFS_FLAGS()/NFS_FLAGSP(). That too is just
> > obfuscating the code for no good reason.
> 
> I completely agree that NFS_FLAGSP is ugly.
> Initially I thought of changing &NFS_FLAGS(inode) to &NFS_I(inode)->flags
> and get rid of NFS_FLAGS, but I deferred to the most minimal change.
> Let me know if you want me to do that.

If you want to get rid of NFS_FLAGS(), then that would be great. Please
make that a separate patch, though.

> > 
> >>>  static void nfs_invalidate_inode(struct inode *inode)
> >>>  {
> >>> -	set_bit(NFS_INO_STALE, &NFS_FLAGS(inode));
> >>> +	set_bit(NFS_INO_STALE, NFS_FLAGSP(inode));
> >> Likewise for NFS_INO_STALE... A separate inline for setting  
> >> NFS_INO_STALE might be a little nicer.
> > 
> > Not an inline. Just convert the existing nfs_invalidate_inode() into an
> > nfs_invalidate_inode_locked(), and add a version that takes the lock.
> 
> I'm not sure I follow you...  All it does is setting the NFS_INO_STALE
> bit and calling nfs_zap_caches_locked.  What use case is there for 
> the unlocked case?

The current version _is_ an 'unlocked' version. nfs_update_inode() uses
it, since the caller already holds the spinlock.

> > 
> >>>  	nfs_zap_caches_locked(inode);
> >>>  }
> >>>
> >>> @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ nfs_init_locked(struct inode *inode, void *opaque)
> >>>  	struct nfs_find_desc	*desc = (struct nfs_find_desc *)opaque;
> >>>  	struct nfs_fattr	*fattr = desc->fattr;
> >>>
> >>> -	NFS_FILEID(inode) = fattr->fileid;
> >>> +	set_nfs_fileid(inode, fattr->fileid);
> >>>  	nfs_copy_fh(NFS_FH(inode), desc->fh);
> >>>  	return 0;
> >>>  }
> >>> @@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ nfs_fhget(struct super_block *sb, struct nfs_fh  
> >>> *fh, struct nfs_fattr *fattr)
> >>>  			inode->i_fop = &nfs_dir_operations;
> >>>  			if (nfs_server_capable(inode, NFS_CAP_READDIRPLUS)
> >>>  			    && fattr->size <= NFS_LIMIT_READDIRPLUS)
> >>> -				set_bit(NFS_INO_ADVISE_RDPLUS, &NFS_FLAGS(inode));
> >>> +				set_bit(NFS_INO_ADVISE_RDPLUS, NFS_FLAGSP(inode));
> >> And for setting NFS_INO_ADVISE_RDPLUS.
> > 
> > Again, why?
> 
> The only good reason I can think of is abstracting the API to allow a different
> implementation in the future, but I see little benefits as for style or readability.

Even if we were planning on changing the implementation, the idea of
abstracting the API is a bit far-fetched: this bit is set in 1 location
and cleared in 2. Tracking those 3 lines of code is hardly a major
problem.

Trond

Re: [PATCH] nfs: parenthesize NFS_*(inode) parameters

[Rick Macklem]

> > They should really be converted into inlined functions.
> > 
> > Cheers
> >   Trond
> 
> Agreed.  How about the following:

Ok, you've tickled my curiosity...why? Unless a macro is large and is
used many times (my really old nfs code was like that, being written
for a compiler that didn't support inline functions), what is the
advantage of inline functions? Or is it just that the code is more readable?

Just curious, I don't have any problem with using inline functions, rick

Re: [PATCH] nfs: parenthesize NFS_*(inode) parameters

[Benny Halevy]

On Jan. 22, 2008, 18:06 +0200, Rick Macklem <rick@snowhite.cis.uoguelph.ca> wrote:
>>> They should really be converted into inlined functions.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>   Trond
>> Agreed.  How about the following:
> 
> Ok, you've tickled my curiosity...why? Unless a macro is large and is
> used many times (my really old nfs code was like that, being written
> for a compiler that didn't support inline functions), what is the
> advantage of inline functions? Or is it just that the code is more readable?

Let me quote Jeff Garzik in http://lwn.net/2000/1123/a/Linus-HOWTO.php3:

	3) 'static inline' is better than a macro

	Static inline functions are greatly preferred over macros.
	They provide type safety, have no length limitations, no formatting
	limitations, and under gcc they are as cheap as macros.

	Macros should only be used for cases where a static inline is clearly
	suboptimal [there a few, isolated cases of this in fast paths],
	or where it is impossible to use a static inline function [such as
	string-izing].

So for zero cost in performance you get safer, scope isolated, and more readable
code.

Benny

> 
> Just curious, I don't have any problem with using inline functions, rick