Re: [PATCH V2] make "noac" and "actimeo=0" work correctly

[Peter Staubach <staubach@redhat.com>]

Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 16:14 -0400, Peter Staubach wrote:
>   
>> Given that we seem to "own" time_in_range(), how about the
>> attached patch which just modifies time_in_range() to calculate
>> [b,c) instead of [b,c], removes the special case for attrtimeo==0
>> in nfs_attribute_timeout() and adds a comment that Chuck requested
>> concerning the need to ensure that zero timeout values continue
>> to work?
>>     
>
> I'm fine with that, but still suggest that you change the name in order
> to avoid confusing possible out-of-tree users.

Okie doke.  I will introduce time_in_range_open(), retest, and then
repost the patch.  Unfortunately, modifying jiffies.h means pretty
much a full kernel build instead of a small incremental build...  :-(

    Thanx!

       ps