From: Greg Banks <gnb-cP1dWloDopni96+mSzHFpQC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
To: Martin Knoblauch <knobi-Ys4E+72pFW0hFhg+JK9F0w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-nfs list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][Resend] Make NFS-Client readahead tunable
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 18:45:01 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48D2150D.7040603@melbourne.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <136998.55258.qm-RqHyxEpxwZuvuULXzWHTWIglqE1Y4D90QQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----
>
>
>>
>> I think having a tunable for client readahead is an excellent idea,
>> although not to solve your particular problem. The SLES10 kernel has a
>> patch which does precisely that, perhaps Neil could post it.
>>
>> I don't think there's a lot of point having both a module parameter and
>> a sysctl.
>>
>>
>
> Actually there is a good reason. The module parameter can be used to set the new value at load time and never bother again. The sysctl is very convenient when doing experiments.
>
You can set module parameters after module load in
/sys/module/$module/parameters.
> As Andrew already pointed out, the best solution would be a mount option.
Yep.
> But that seems much more involved as my workaround patch.
>
>
Yep.
>> A maximum of 15 is unwise. I've found that (at least with the older
>> readahead mechanisms in SLES10) a multiple of 4 is required to preserve
>> rsize-alignment of READ rpcs to the server, which helps a lot with wide
>> RAID backends. So in SGI we tune client readahead to 16.
>>
>>
>
> 15 is the value that the Linux NFS client uses., at least since 2.6.3.
It's a silly value.
> As it is not tunable up to today, the comment seems moot :-) But it opens the questions:
>
> a) should 1 be the minimum, or 0?
>
Turning off client RA entirely is potentially useful.
> b) can the backing_dev_info.ra_pages field safely be set to something higher than 15?
>
Yes. Did I mention 16 ?
>
>> Your patch seems to have a bunch of other unrelated stuff mixed in.
>>
>>
>
> Yeah, someone already pointed out, that the Makefile hunk does not belong there. But you say "a bunch" - anything else?
>
I rapidly scrolled past some stuff about 64bit inodes.
> Cheers
> Martin
> PS: Did we ever meet/mail when I was at SGI (1991-1997)?
>
>
I'm more recent than that.
--
Greg Banks, P.Engineer, SGI Australian Software Group.
Be like the squirrel.
I don't speak for SGI.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-18 8:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-18 8:19 [RFC][Resend] Make NFS-Client readahead tunable Martin Knoblauch
[not found] ` <136998.55258.qm-RqHyxEpxwZuvuULXzWHTWIglqE1Y4D90QQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-18 8:45 ` Greg Banks [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-09-21 12:53 Martin Knoblauch
2008-09-21 12:50 Martin Knoblauch
[not found] ` <968192.84087.qm-f6uctMgKLEavuULXzWHTWIglqE1Y4D90QQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-21 13:53 ` Chuck Lever
2008-09-18 11:53 Martin Knoblauch
[not found] ` <688309.69831.qm-lSXk2nNw7cevuULXzWHTWIglqE1Y4D90QQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-18 18:24 ` Chuck Lever
[not found] ` <76bd70e30809181124t78c0d574gaed5702095c02921-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-18 19:03 ` Peter Staubach
2008-09-18 9:32 Martin Knoblauch
2008-09-18 8:38 Martin Knoblauch
[not found] ` <124712.40022.qm-n7KXdZBPtPqvuULXzWHTWIglqE1Y4D90QQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-18 8:47 ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-18 8:57 ` Greg Banks
2008-09-18 13:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-18 7:42 Martin Knoblauch
[not found] ` <418380.19358.qm-1+WuAixcP4WvuULXzWHTWIglqE1Y4D90QQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-18 8:18 ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-17 17:01 Martin Knoblauch
2008-09-17 16:23 Martin Knoblauch
[not found] ` <804604.40886.qm-f6uctMgKLEavuULXzWHTWIglqE1Y4D90QQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-17 16:43 ` Chuck Lever
2008-09-17 16:15 Martin Knoblauch
2008-09-17 16:10 Martin Knoblauch
2008-09-17 16:03 Martin Knoblauch
2008-09-17 13:42 Michael Trimarchi
2008-09-17 13:27 Martin Knoblauch
2008-09-17 13:25 Martin Knoblauch
[not found] ` <995475.95604.qm-f6uctMgKLEavuULXzWHTWIglqE1Y4D90QQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-17 15:31 ` Jim Rees
2008-09-17 13:19 Michael Trimarchi
2008-09-17 13:06 Martin Knoblauch
[not found] ` <997439.5560.qm-VAEUvbQToQWvuULXzWHTWIglqE1Y4D90QQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-17 13:21 ` Jim Rees
2008-09-17 14:06 ` Peter Staubach
2008-09-17 15:41 ` Chuck Lever
2008-09-18 1:42 ` Greg Banks
[not found] ` <48D1B21E.3060509-cP1dWloDopni96+mSzHFpQC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-18 3:13 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48D2150D.7040603@melbourne.sgi.com \
--to=gnb-cp1dwlodopni96+mszhfpqc/g2k4zdhf@public.gmane.org \
--cc=knobi-Ys4E+72pFW0hFhg+JK9F0w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox