public inbox for linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, pnfs@linux-nfs.org
Subject: Re: Ping: [pnfs] [RFC 1/1] nfs4: optionally return status from	state_manager
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:17:13 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ABCD0E9.5030309@panasas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090925141015.GA26587@fieldses.org>

On Sep. 25, 2009, 17:10 +0300, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 04:53:17PM +0300, Benny Halevy wrote:
>> On 2009-09-25 16:29, Trond Myklebust wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 07:30 +0300, Benny Halevy wrote:
>>>> Trond,
>>>>
>>>> Is the patch below acceptable?
>>>>
>>>> Benny
>>> I'm still not entirely happy with the idea that the state manager can
>>> get into situations where it needs outside help, and you haven't really
>>> explained to me the root cause of the scenario.
>>> You said something about
>>>
>>> nfs4_create_server()
>>> nfs4_init_session()
>>> nfs4_recover_expired_lease()
>>>         nfs4_schedule_state_recovery()
>>>                 # and the failure happens within the state engine
>>>                 nfs4_proc_create_session()
>>>                 nfs4_proc_get_lease_time() return -2
>>>
>>> Where does that ENOENT come from?
>>>
>>> You said something about it being an error in OP_PUTROOTFH, but as far
>>> as I can see, the only permitted errors for putrootfh are either session
>>> related errors (which should be handled by the state machine),
>>> NFS4ERR_DELAY (which should be handled by the state machine) and
>>> NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC. So which error is generating your ENOENT?
>>>
>> That scenario is caused when the server's /etc/exports
>> is badly configured, where the export entry for nfsv4
>> (fsid=0) exports a non-existing path.
>>
>> I agree that the server should not return ENOENT
>> for PUTROOTFH as it contradicts the spec.
>> NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT seems more appropriate.
>>
>> The main reason for getting the failure from
>> the state engine in nfsv4.1 is that we need to
>> create a session before nfs4_path_walk in nfs4_create_server
>> and we do that using the state manager.
>> In the nfsv4.0 case we create no state at this point.
> 
> So is there any actual client-side bug here?

The client side bug is returning an irrelevant
and confusing error status back to the application (mount.nfs4).

Benny

> 
> --b.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-25 14:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-02  7:48 [PATCH 1/1 v2] nfs41: pass state recovery error back to caller Benny Halevy
2009-09-02 17:52 ` Trond Myklebust
     [not found]   ` <1251913960.26601.41.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-02 18:06     ` Benny Halevy
2009-09-02 19:09       ` Trond Myklebust
     [not found]         ` <1251918574.26601.48.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-02 21:04           ` Benny Halevy
2009-09-03 15:15             ` [RFC 1/1] nfs4: optionally return status from state_manager Benny Halevy
2009-09-25  4:30               ` Ping: [pnfs] " Benny Halevy
2009-09-25 13:29                 ` Trond Myklebust
     [not found]                   ` <1253885382.31072.14.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-25 13:53                     ` Benny Halevy
2009-09-25 14:10                       ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-09-25 14:17                         ` Benny Halevy [this message]
2009-09-25 14:13                       ` Trond Myklebust
     [not found]                         ` <1253888019.31072.31.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-25 14:19                           ` Benny Halevy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4ABCD0E9.5030309@panasas.com \
    --to=bhalevy@panasas.com \
    --cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=bfields@citi.umich.edu \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pnfs@linux-nfs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox