From: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@suse.de>
To: trond.myklebust@netapp.com, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Linux NFS mailing list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH] nfs: don't assume fscache_acquire_cookie will always succeed
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:51:57 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B56F565.7080104@suse.de> (raw)
We seem to be assuming fscache_acquire_cookie will always succeed and will
obtain a valid cookie. But, under low memory conditions kmem_cache_alloc
could fail and that would leave nfsi->fscache being set to NULL.
This could lead to a possibility of a page with PG_fscache flag set but
cookie not set(i.e. NULL). This inconsistency could trigger a kernel BUG in
nfs_fscache_release_page() and other places as we do BUG_ON(!cookie), I think.
I'm aware that there are other places where we would need such checks, but
wanted to validate this patch before getting on to them.
Signed-off-by: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@suse.de>
---
fs/nfs/client.c | 2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/client.c b/fs/nfs/client.c
index ee77713..7776e8a 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/client.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/client.c
@@ -155,6 +155,8 @@ static struct nfs_client *nfs_alloc_client(const struct nfs_client_initdata *cl_
clp->cl_machine_cred = cred;
nfs_fscache_get_client_cookie(clp);
+ if (!clp->fscache)
+ goto error_cleanup;
return clp;
--
Suresh Jayaraman
next reply other threads:[~2010-01-20 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-20 12:21 Suresh Jayaraman [this message]
2010-01-20 21:35 ` [RFC][PATCH] nfs: don't assume fscache_acquire_cookie will always succeed Trond Myklebust
2010-01-21 11:07 ` David Howells
2010-01-21 11:41 ` Suresh Jayaraman
2010-01-22 12:52 ` Suresh Jayaraman
2010-01-23 3:48 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B56F565.7080104@suse.de \
--to=sjayaraman@suse.de \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@netapp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox