From: Bryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com>
To: Pavel <free.lan.c2.718r@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: clients fail to reclaim locks after server reboot or manual sm-notify
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:10:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EC1678D.902@netapp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <loom.20111114T180637-632@post.gmane.org>
Hello Pavel,
What kernel version is Debian using? I haven't been able to reproduce the problem using 3.0 (But I'm on Archlinux, so there might be other differences).
- Bryan
On Mon 14 Nov 2011 12:11:56 PM EST, Pavel wrote:
> Hi! I'm trying to set up an NFS server (particularly an A/A NFS cluster) and
> having issues with locking and reboot notifications. These are the tests I have
> done:
>
> 1. The simplest test includes single NFS server machine (Debian Squeeze),
> running nfs-kernel-server (nfs-utils 1.2.2-4) and a single client machine (same
> OS), that mounts a share with “-o 'vers=3'” option. From the client I lock some
> file on share using 'testlk -w <filename>' (testlk from nfsutils/tools/locktest)
> so that a corresponding file appears in /var/lib/nfs/sm/ on server. Then I
> reboot the server and this is what I get in client logs:
>
> lockd: request from 127.0.0.1, port=1007
> lockd: SM_NOTIFY called
> lockd: host nfs-server1 (192.168.0.101) rebooted, cnt 2
> lockd: get host nfs-server1
> lockd: get host nfs-server1
> lockd: release host nfs-server1
> lockd: reclaiming locks for host nfs-server1
> lockd: rebind host nfs-server1
> lockd: call procedure 2 on nfs-server1
> lockd: nlm_bind_host nfs-server1 (192.168.0.101)
> lockd: rpc_call returned error 13
> lockd: failed to reclaim lock for pid 1555 (errno -13, status 0)
> NLM: done reclaiming locks for host nfs-server1
> lockd: release host nfs-server1
>
> 2. As I'm building a cluster I'll need to notify clients when NFS resource
> migrates (since it is an A/A cluster nfs-kernel-server is always running on all
> nodes and shares migrate using exportfs resource agent), but manually calling
> sm-notify ('sm-notify -f -v <virtual IP of share>') from either the initial for
> that share or backup node results in the following (client logs):
>
> lockd: request from 127.0.0.1, port=637
> lockd: SM_NOTIFY called
> lockd: host B (192.168.0.110) rebooted, cnt 2
> lockd: get host B
> lockd: get host B
> lockd: release host B
> lockd: reclaiming locks for host B
> lockd: rebind host B
> lockd: call procedure 2 on B
> lockd: nlm_bind_host B (192.168.0.110)
> lockd: server in grace period
> lockd: spurious grace period reject?!
> lockd: failed to reclaim lock for pid 2508 (errno -37, status 4)
> NLM: done reclaiming locks for host B
> lockd: release host B
>
> even though grace period is intended for lock reclamation. B/w after such
> invocation no files, corresponding to the notified clients, appear in
> /var/lib/nfs/sm/ on server for about 10 minutes, if I try locking from any of
> these notified clients, even though locking itself is ok. Locking from other
> clients generates files for them instantly.
>
> As of the rest: simple concurrent lock tests from couple of clients work fine as
> well as server frees locks of rebooted clients.
>
> I'm new to NFS an may be missing obvious things, but I've already spent several
> days googling around, but don't seem to find any solution.
> Any help or guidance is highly appreciated. Thanks!
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-14 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-14 17:11 clients fail to reclaim locks after server reboot or manual sm-notify Pavel
2011-11-14 19:10 ` Bryan Schumaker [this message]
2011-11-14 21:55 ` Bryan Schumaker
2011-11-15 15:50 ` Pavel
2011-11-15 17:19 ` Pavel
2011-11-15 21:48 ` Bryan Schumaker
2011-11-15 22:16 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-11-16 14:25 ` Bryan Schumaker
2011-11-16 14:58 ` Pavel
2011-11-16 15:30 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-11-16 17:15 ` Pasha Z
2011-11-16 17:28 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-11-16 17:37 ` Bryan Schumaker
2011-11-16 19:09 ` Pavel A
2011-11-16 20:08 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-11-16 20:21 ` Bryan Schumaker
2011-11-16 21:56 ` Pavel A
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EC1678D.902@netapp.com \
--to=bjschuma@netapp.com \
--cc=free.lan.c2.718r@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox