From: Nikolaus Rath <Nikolaus@rath.org>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, nfsv4@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] NFS4 over VPN hangs when connecting > 2 clients
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 14:43:47 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F677E63.90300@rath.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120319183955.GC23670@fieldses.org>
On 03/19/2012 02:39 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 02:29:46PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 19, 2012, at 2:27 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 01:47:14PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mar 19, 2012, at 1:36 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>>>>> Well, sure, but all I'm proposing here is returning NFS4ERR_INUSE in the
>>>>> case where we get setclientid's with the same client-provided id.
>>>>> There'd be no change of behavior in the case of multiple clients sharing
>>>>> an IP (which is fine, of course).
>>>>
>>>> The migration draft proposes that clients use the same nfs_client_id4 string for all of a server's IP addresses. Would a server then be obliged to return NFS4ERR_CLID_IN_USE if a client attempts a SETCLIENTID with the same boot verifier and nfs_client_id4 on more than one IP address for the same server?
>>>
>>> That's also not this case, sorry, this time with all the conditions:
>>>
>>> - if the nfs_client_id4 is the same, and
>>> - if the flavor is auth_sys, and
>>> - if the client IP address is different,
>>> - then return NFS4ERR_INUSE.
>>
>> This still breaks for multi-homed servers and UCS clients. The client IP address can be different depending on what server IP address the client is accessing, but all the other parameters are the same.
>
> OK. So probably there's nothing we can do to help here.
>
> As a bandaid maybe a rate-limited log message ("clientid X now in use
> from IP Y") might help debug these things....
Since you guys keep Cc'ing me, I'll chime in with a rather naive
suggestion: if all that's required is a unique id for every client, why
not use the MAC of the first network interface, independent of it being
used for communication with the server?
Best,
-Nikolaus
--
»Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«
PGP fingerprint: 5B93 61F8 4EA2 E279 ABF6 02CF A9AD B7F8 AE4E 425C
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-19 18:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-11 1:34 NFS4 over VPN hangs when connecting > 2 clients Nikolaus Rath
2012-03-12 16:20 ` Nikolaus Rath
2012-03-12 19:31 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-03-12 19:45 ` Nikolaus Rath
2012-03-12 20:15 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-03-12 20:30 ` Nikolaus Rath
2012-03-12 20:42 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-03-12 20:49 ` Chuck Lever
2012-03-12 21:04 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-03-12 21:14 ` Chuck Lever
2012-03-12 21:27 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-03-19 16:28 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-03-19 16:44 ` [nfsv4] " Rick Macklem
2012-03-19 17:06 ` Rick Macklem
2012-03-19 17:36 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-03-19 17:47 ` Chuck Lever
2012-03-19 18:24 ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-03-19 18:27 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-03-19 18:29 ` Chuck Lever
2012-03-19 18:39 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-03-19 18:42 ` Chuck Lever
2012-03-19 18:54 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-03-19 19:00 ` Chuck Lever
2012-03-19 19:08 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-03-19 18:43 ` Nikolaus Rath [this message]
2012-03-19 22:25 ` Rick Macklem
2012-03-20 13:29 ` Nikolaus Rath
2012-03-20 13:55 ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-03-20 14:36 ` Nikolaus Rath
2012-03-20 16:49 ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-03-20 14:01 ` Chuck Lever
2012-03-20 14:38 ` Nikolaus Rath
2012-03-20 15:53 ` Chuck Lever
2012-03-19 18:51 ` Nikolaus Rath
2012-03-19 18:56 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-03-19 22:31 ` Rick Macklem
2012-03-19 18:26 ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-03-12 21:24 ` Nikolaus Rath
2012-03-12 21:27 ` Chuck Lever
2012-03-12 21:38 ` Nikolaus Rath
2012-03-12 21:46 ` Chuck Lever
2012-03-12 21:54 ` Chuck Lever
2012-03-12 21:54 ` Nikolaus Rath
2012-03-12 21:57 ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-03-13 13:23 ` Nikolaus Rath
2012-03-13 14:50 ` Myklebust, Trond
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F677E63.90300@rath.org \
--to=nikolaus@rath.org \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nfsv4@ietf.org \
--cc=rmacklem@uoguelph.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox