From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] nfs: Properly initialize server->writeback
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 15:56:36 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ccfb492bd6af24f8bdfd085d369c7c94c1865d1.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240613082821.849-2-jack@suse.cz>
On Thu, 2024-06-13 at 10:28 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> Atomic types should better be initialized with atomic_long_set()
> instead
> of relying on zeroing done by kzalloc(). Clean this up.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> ---
> fs/nfs/client.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/client.c b/fs/nfs/client.c
> index de77848ae654..3b252dceebf5 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/client.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/client.c
> @@ -994,6 +994,8 @@ struct nfs_server *nfs_alloc_server(void)
>
> server->change_attr_type = NFS4_CHANGE_TYPE_IS_UNDEFINED;
>
> + atomic_long_set(&server->writeback, 0);
> +
> ida_init(&server->openowner_id);
> ida_init(&server->lockowner_id);
> pnfs_init_server(server);
I'm guilty of doing this, well, all over the place. Is there any
plausible scenario where another task could see this value set to non-
zero after kzalloc()? One would hope not...
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-13 19:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-13 8:28 [PATCH 0/3] nfs: Improve throughput for random buffered writes Jan Kara
2024-06-13 8:28 ` [PATCH 1/3] nfs: Drop pointless check from nfs_commit_release_pages() Jan Kara
2024-06-13 9:17 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-06-13 19:55 ` Jeff Layton
2024-06-13 8:28 ` [PATCH 2/3] nfs: Properly initialize server->writeback Jan Kara
2024-06-13 9:17 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-06-13 19:56 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2024-06-14 11:33 ` Jan Kara
2024-06-13 8:28 ` [PATCH 3/3] nfs: Block on write congestion Jan Kara
2024-06-13 9:18 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-06-13 20:04 ` Jeff Layton
2024-06-14 11:44 ` Jan Kara
2024-06-13 22:56 ` NeilBrown
2024-06-14 11:57 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ccfb492bd6af24f8bdfd085d369c7c94c1865d1.camel@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox