* 3.11 patches
@ 2013-05-13 15:23 J. Bruce Fields
2013-05-13 15:28 ` Myklebust, Trond
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: J. Bruce Fields @ 2013-05-13 15:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Trond Myklebust, steved; +Cc: linux-nfs
I've added a labeled-nfs-common branch at
git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux.git labeled-nfs-common
with 3.10-rc1 + the one labeled NFS patch shared by client and server
(with just some protocol constants).
So we can all work on top of that if we want.
(Or just apply the thing separately--it's a tiny patch.)
I also pushed the minimal server 4.2 patches to the for-3.11 branch.
The actual labeled nfs server patch I'll add as soon as I hear it's
passing tests again.
--b.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 3.11 patches
2013-05-13 15:23 3.11 patches J. Bruce Fields
@ 2013-05-13 15:28 ` Myklebust, Trond
2013-05-13 15:39 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-05-13 17:31 ` Steve Dickson
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Myklebust, Trond @ 2013-05-13 15:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: J. Bruce Fields; +Cc: steved@redhat.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 11:23 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> I've added a labeled-nfs-common branch at
>
> git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux.git labeled-nfs-common
>
> with 3.10-rc1 + the one labeled NFS patch shared by client and server
> (with just some protocol constants).
>
> So we can all work on top of that if we want.
OK. I've pushed out a 'labeled-nfs' branch for the client side that is
based upon the above branch.
Has James added the security patches to a public branch that we can pull
yet?
--
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer
NetApp
Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com
www.netapp.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 3.11 patches
2013-05-13 15:28 ` Myklebust, Trond
@ 2013-05-13 15:39 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-05-14 2:05 ` James Morris
2013-05-13 17:31 ` Steve Dickson
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: J. Bruce Fields @ 2013-05-13 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Myklebust, Trond
Cc: steved@redhat.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, James Morris
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 03:28:09PM +0000, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 11:23 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > I've added a labeled-nfs-common branch at
> >
> > git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux.git labeled-nfs-common
> >
> > with 3.10-rc1 + the one labeled NFS patch shared by client and server
> > (with just some protocol constants).
> >
> > So we can all work on top of that if we want.
>
> OK. I've pushed out a 'labeled-nfs' branch for the client side that is
> based upon the above branch.
>
> Has James added the security patches to a public branch that we can pull
> yet?
I assumed his ACK meant he was comfortable with us merging them.
None of them are needed on the server side as far as I can tell, so
that'd mean they'd go through your tree.
James, is that OK with you?
--b.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 3.11 patches
2013-05-13 15:39 ` J. Bruce Fields
@ 2013-05-14 2:05 ` James Morris
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: James Morris @ 2013-05-14 2:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: J. Bruce Fields
Cc: Myklebust, Trond, steved@redhat.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
On Mon, 13 May 2013, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 03:28:09PM +0000, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 11:23 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > > I've added a labeled-nfs-common branch at
> > >
> > > git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux.git labeled-nfs-common
> > >
> > > with 3.10-rc1 + the one labeled NFS patch shared by client and server
> > > (with just some protocol constants).
> > >
> > > So we can all work on top of that if we want.
> >
> > OK. I've pushed out a 'labeled-nfs' branch for the client side that is
> > based upon the above branch.
> >
> > Has James added the security patches to a public branch that we can pull
> > yet?
>
> I assumed his ACK meant he was comfortable with us merging them.
>
> None of them are needed on the server side as far as I can tell, so
> that'd mean they'd go through your tree.
>
> James, is that OK with you?
Yep.
--
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 3.11 patches
2013-05-13 15:28 ` Myklebust, Trond
2013-05-13 15:39 ` J. Bruce Fields
@ 2013-05-13 17:31 ` Steve Dickson
2013-05-13 17:37 ` Myklebust, Trond
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Steve Dickson @ 2013-05-13 17:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Myklebust, Trond; +Cc: J. Bruce Fields, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
On 13/05/13 11:28, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 11:23 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>> I've added a labeled-nfs-common branch at
>>
>> git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux.git labeled-nfs-common
>>
>> with 3.10-rc1 + the one labeled NFS patch shared by client and server
>> (with just some protocol constants).
>>
>> So we can all work on top of that if we want.
>
> OK. I've pushed out a 'labeled-nfs' branch for the client side that is
> based upon the above branch.
Momentary I will be posting the 3.10-rc1 forward port.
>
> Has James added the security patches to a public branch that we can pull
> yet?
>
No and he does not plan to... because "It won't be functional without the security
subsystem patches, so they should all be in his tree." Meaning your tree...
steved.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* RE: 3.11 patches
2013-05-13 17:31 ` Steve Dickson
@ 2013-05-13 17:37 ` Myklebust, Trond
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Myklebust, Trond @ 2013-05-13 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steve Dickson; +Cc: J. Bruce Fields, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Dickson [mailto:SteveD@redhat.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 1:31 PM
> To: Myklebust, Trond
> Cc: J. Bruce Fields; linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: 3.11 patches
>
>
>
> On 13/05/13 11:28, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 11:23 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> >> I've added a labeled-nfs-common branch at
> >>
> >> git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux.git labeled-nfs-common
> >>
> >> with 3.10-rc1 + the one labeled NFS patch shared by client and server
> >> (with just some protocol constants).
> >>
> >> So we can all work on top of that if we want.
> >
> > OK. I've pushed out a 'labeled-nfs' branch for the client side that is
> > based upon the above branch.
> Momentary I will be posting the 3.10-rc1 forward port.
>
> >
> > Has James added the security patches to a public branch that we can
> > pull yet?
> >
> No and he does not plan to... because "It won't be functional without the
> security subsystem patches, so they should all be in his tree." Meaning your
> tree...
As long as James is fine with me pushing those patches, then I'm happy to do so...
Cheers
Trond
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-05-14 1:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-05-13 15:23 3.11 patches J. Bruce Fields
2013-05-13 15:28 ` Myklebust, Trond
2013-05-13 15:39 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-05-14 2:05 ` James Morris
2013-05-13 17:31 ` Steve Dickson
2013-05-13 17:37 ` Myklebust, Trond
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox