From: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com>
To: Dr Fields James Bruce <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SUNRPC: Clear xpt_bc_xprt if xs_setup_bc_tcp failed
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 11:22:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52CF677D.80803@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52CF5E61.5040002@gmail.com>
On 01/10/2014 10:43 AM, Kinglong Mee wrote:
> On 01/10/2014 12:34 AM, Dr Fields James Bruce wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 03:26:04PM +0800, Kinglong Mee wrote:
>>> On 01/07/2014 01:01 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Jan 6, 2014, at 23:41, Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> If try_module_get failed, xpt_bc_xprt should be set to NULL,
>>>>> because xprt will be free.
>>>>>
>>>>> Don't needed using xprt_put to free xprt, because it is always new.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c | 4 ++--
>>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
>>>>> index 4fcdf74..5ed124f 100644
>>>>> --- a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
>>>>> +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
>>>>> @@ -2986,10 +2986,10 @@ static struct rpc_xprt *xs_setup_bc_tcp(struct xprt_create *args)
>>>>> */
>>>>> xprt_set_connected(xprt);
>>>>>
>>>>> -
>>>>> if (try_module_get(THIS_MODULE))
>>>>> return xprt;
>>>>> - xprt_put(xprt);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + args->bc_xprt->xpt_bc_xprt = NULL;
>>>>> ret = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>>>>> out_err:
>>>>> xs_xprt_free(xprt);
>>>>
>>>> Just move the 'args->bc_xprt->xpt_bc_xprt = xprt’ line into the caller (see earlier discussion about xs_setup_bc_tcp()). Quite frankly, I don’t see why the client code should be modifying this variable in the first place. An svc_xprt is a server construct.
>>>
>>> Hi Bruce,
>>>
>>> When reviewing those codes for bc_xprt, I found commit d75faea330dbd1873c9094e9926ae306590c0998
>>> 'rpc: move sk_bc_xprt to svc_xprt'. I'd like recording bc_xprt in svc_sock.
>>
>> OK, I think it would be alright to revert that commit.
>
> I will try to revert it later.
I had try to revert it, but, I don't revert it.
I'm sorry for my above thinking.
I think it is not needed to move bc_xprt from one place to another
without fix some problem, because knfsd running correctly with that.
Just let bc_xprt in svc_xprt until some problem appears.
Thanks,
Kinglong Mee
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-10 3:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-07 4:41 [PATCH] SUNRPC: Clear xpt_bc_xprt if xs_setup_bc_tcp failed Kinglong Mee
2014-01-07 5:01 ` Trond Myklebust
2014-01-07 5:21 ` Kinglong Mee
2014-01-07 7:26 ` Kinglong Mee
2014-01-09 16:34 ` Dr Fields James Bruce
2014-01-10 2:43 ` Kinglong Mee
2014-01-10 3:22 ` Kinglong Mee [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52CF677D.80803@gmail.com \
--to=kinglongmee@gmail.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox