From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@redhat.com>,
Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] nfsd: filecache: introduce NFSD_FILE_RECENT
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 09:01:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5e6060d79e247a7e97443f200399061da8d558f9.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250207051701.3467505-5-neilb@suse.de>
On Fri, 2025-02-07 at 16:15 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> The filecache lru is walked in 2 circumstances for 2 different reasons.
>
> 1/ When called from the shrinker we want to discard the first few
> entries on the list, ignoring any with NFSD_FILE_REFERENCED set
> because they should really be at the end of the LRU as they have been
> referenced recently. So those ones are ROTATED.
>
> 2/ When called from the nfsd_file_gc() timer function we want to discard
> anything that hasn't been used since before the previous call, and
> mark everything else as unused at this point in time.
>
> Using the same flag for both of these can result in some unexpected
> outcomes. If the shrinker callback clears NFSD_FILE_REFERENCED then the
> nfsd_file_gc() will think the file hasn't been used in a while, while
> really it has.
>
> I think it is easier to reason about the behaviour if we instead have
> two flags.
>
> NFSD_FILE_REFERENCED means "this should be at the end of the LRU, please
> put it there when convenient"
> NFSD_FILE_RECENT means "this has been used recently - since the last
> run of nfsd_file_gc()
>
> When either caller finds an NFSD_FILE_REFERENCED entry, that entry
> should be moved to the end of the LRU and the flag cleared. This can
> safely happen at any time. The actual order on the lru might not be
> strictly least-recently-used, but that is normal for linux lrus.
>
> The shrinker callback can ignore the "recent" flag. If it ends up
> freeing something that is "recent" that simply means that memory
> pressure is sufficient to limit the acceptable cache age to less than
> the nfsd_file_gc frequency.
>
> The gc caller should primarily focus on NFSD_FILE_RECENT. It should
> free everything that doesn't have this flag set, and should clear the
> flag on everything else. When it clears the flag it is convenient to
> clear the "REFERENCED" flag and move to the end of the LRU too.
>
> With this, calls from the shrinker do not prematurely age files. It
> will focus only on freeing those that are least recently used.
>
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
> ---
> fs/nfsd/filecache.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
> fs/nfsd/filecache.h | 1 +
> fs/nfsd/trace.h | 3 +++
> 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/filecache.c b/fs/nfsd/filecache.c
> index 04588c03bdfe..9faf469354a5 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/filecache.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/filecache.c
> @@ -318,10 +318,10 @@ nfsd_file_check_writeback(struct nfsd_file *nf)
> mapping_tagged(mapping, PAGECACHE_TAG_WRITEBACK);
> }
>
> -
> static bool nfsd_file_lru_add(struct nfsd_file *nf)
> {
> set_bit(NFSD_FILE_REFERENCED, &nf->nf_flags);
> + set_bit(NFSD_FILE_RECENT, &nf->nf_flags);
Technically, I don't think you need the REFERENCED bit at all. This is
the only place it's set, and below this is calling list_lru_add_obj().
That returns false if the object was already on a per-node LRU.
Instead of that, you could add a list_lru helper that will rotate the
object to the end of its nodelist if it's already on one. OTOH, that
might mean more cross NUMA-node accesses to the spinlocks than we get
by using a flag and doing this at GC time.
> if (list_lru_add_obj(&nfsd_file_lru, &nf->nf_lru)) {
> trace_nfsd_file_lru_add(nf);
> return true;
> @@ -528,6 +528,23 @@ nfsd_file_lru_cb(struct list_head *item, struct list_lru_one *lru,
> return LRU_REMOVED;
> }
>
> +static enum lru_status
> +nfsd_file_gc_cb(struct list_head *item, struct list_lru_one *lru,
> + void *arg)
> +{
> + struct nfsd_file *nf = list_entry(item, struct nfsd_file, nf_lru);
> +
> + if (test_and_clear_bit(NFSD_FILE_RECENT, &nf->nf_flags)) {
> + /* "REFERENCED" really means "should be at the end of the LRU.
> + * As we are putting it there we can clear the flag
> + */
> + clear_bit(NFSD_FILE_REFERENCED, &nf->nf_flags);
> + trace_nfsd_file_gc_aged(nf);
> + return LRU_ROTATE;
> + }
> + return nfsd_file_lru_cb(item, lru, arg);
> +}
> +
> static void
> nfsd_file_gc(void)
> {
> @@ -537,7 +554,7 @@ nfsd_file_gc(void)
>
> for_each_node_state(nid, N_NORMAL_MEMORY) {
> unsigned long nr = list_lru_count_node(&nfsd_file_lru, nid);
> - ret += list_lru_walk_node(&nfsd_file_lru, nid, nfsd_file_lru_cb,
> + ret += list_lru_walk_node(&nfsd_file_lru, nid, nfsd_file_gc_cb,
> &dispose, &nr);
> }
> trace_nfsd_file_gc_removed(ret, list_lru_count(&nfsd_file_lru));
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/filecache.h b/fs/nfsd/filecache.h
> index d5db6b34ba30..de5b8aa7fcb0 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/filecache.h
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/filecache.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ struct nfsd_file {
> #define NFSD_FILE_PENDING (1)
> #define NFSD_FILE_REFERENCED (2)
> #define NFSD_FILE_GC (3)
> +#define NFSD_FILE_RECENT (4)
> unsigned long nf_flags;
> refcount_t nf_ref;
> unsigned char nf_may;
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/trace.h b/fs/nfsd/trace.h
> index ad2c0c432d08..9af723eeb2b0 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/trace.h
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/trace.h
> @@ -1039,6 +1039,7 @@ DEFINE_CLID_EVENT(confirmed_r);
> { 1 << NFSD_FILE_HASHED, "HASHED" }, \
> { 1 << NFSD_FILE_PENDING, "PENDING" }, \
> { 1 << NFSD_FILE_REFERENCED, "REFERENCED" }, \
> + { 1 << NFSD_FILE_RECENT, "RECENT" }, \
> { 1 << NFSD_FILE_GC, "GC" })
>
> DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(nfsd_file_class,
> @@ -1317,6 +1318,7 @@ DEFINE_NFSD_FILE_GC_EVENT(nfsd_file_lru_del_disposed);
> DEFINE_NFSD_FILE_GC_EVENT(nfsd_file_gc_in_use);
> DEFINE_NFSD_FILE_GC_EVENT(nfsd_file_gc_writeback);
> DEFINE_NFSD_FILE_GC_EVENT(nfsd_file_gc_referenced);
> +DEFINE_NFSD_FILE_GC_EVENT(nfsd_file_gc_aged);
> DEFINE_NFSD_FILE_GC_EVENT(nfsd_file_gc_disposed);
>
> DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(nfsd_file_lruwalk_class,
> @@ -1346,6 +1348,7 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(nfsd_file_lruwalk_class, name, \
> TP_ARGS(removed, remaining))
>
> DEFINE_NFSD_FILE_LRUWALK_EVENT(nfsd_file_gc_removed);
> +DEFINE_NFSD_FILE_LRUWALK_EVENT(nfsd_file_gc_recent);
> DEFINE_NFSD_FILE_LRUWALK_EVENT(nfsd_file_shrinker_removed);
>
> TRACE_EVENT(nfsd_file_close,
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-10 14:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-07 5:15 [PATCH 0/6] nfsd: filecache: various fixes NeilBrown
2025-02-07 5:15 ` [PATCH 1/6] nfsd: filecache: remove race handling NeilBrown
2025-02-10 23:33 ` Dave Chinner
2025-02-12 22:16 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-13 15:02 ` Chuck Lever
2025-02-07 5:15 ` [PATCH 2/6] nfsd: filecache: use nfsd_file_dispose_list() in nfsd_file_close_inode_sync() NeilBrown
2025-02-07 5:15 ` [PATCH 3/6] nfsd: filecache: use list_lru_walk_node() in nfsd_file_gc() NeilBrown
2025-02-07 14:43 ` Chuck Lever
2025-02-09 23:16 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-10 13:46 ` Jeff Layton
2025-02-07 5:15 ` [PATCH 4/6] nfsd: filecache: introduce NFSD_FILE_RECENT NeilBrown
2025-02-07 14:52 ` Chuck Lever
2025-02-09 23:23 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-10 0:50 ` Chuck Lever
2025-02-10 2:31 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-10 14:25 ` Jeff Layton
2025-02-12 22:39 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-13 0:08 ` Chuck Lever
2025-02-13 11:27 ` Jeff Layton
2025-02-10 14:26 ` Chuck Lever
2025-02-10 14:01 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2025-02-10 23:57 ` Dave Chinner
2025-02-11 11:38 ` Jeff Layton
2025-02-07 5:15 ` [PATCH 5/6] nfsd: filecache: don't repeatedly add/remove files on the lru list NeilBrown
2025-02-07 5:15 ` [PATCH 6/6] nfsd: filecache: drop the list_lru lock during lock gc scans NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5e6060d79e247a7e97443f200399061da8d558f9.camel@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox