From: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: jlayton@kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] NFSD: cancel CB_RECALL_ANY call when nfs4_client is about to be destroyed
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 18:09:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <69914825-e9d5-4859-a5a8-60d17e8e8bf6@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZgMToHNkkGEHNb/y@tissot.1015granger.net>
On 3/26/24 11:27 AM, Chuck Lever wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 11:13:29AM -0700, Dai Ngo wrote:
>> Currently when a nfs4_client is destroyed we wait for the cb_recall_any
>> callback to complete before proceed. This adds unnecessary delay to the
>> __destroy_client call if there is problem communicating with the client.
> By "unnecessary delay" do you mean only the seven-second RPC
> retransmit timeout, or is there something else?
when the client network interface is down, the RPC task takes ~9s to
send the callback, waits for the reply and gets ETIMEDOUT. This process
repeats in a loop with the same RPC task before being stopped by
rpc_shutdown_client after client lease expires.
It takes a total of about 1m20s before the CB_RECALL is terminated.
For CB_RECALL_ANY and CB_OFFLOAD, this process gets in to a infinite
loop since there is no delegation conflict and the client is allowed
to stay in courtesy state.
The loop happens because in nfsd4_cb_sequence_done if cb_seq_status
is 1 (an RPC Reply was never received) it calls nfsd4_mark_cb_fault
to set the NFSD4_CB_FAULT bit. It then sets cb_need_restart to true.
When nfsd4_cb_release is called, it checks cb_need_restart bit and
re-queues the work again.
> I can see that a server shutdown might want to cancel these, but why
> is this a problem when destroying an nfs4_client?
Destroying an nfs4_client is called when the export is unmounted.
Cancelling these calls just make the process a bit quicker when there
is problem with the client connection, or preventing the unmount to
hang if there is problem at the workqueue and a callback work is
pending there.
For CB_RECALL, even if we wait for the call to complete the client
won't be able to return any delegations since the nfs4_client is
already been destroyed. It just serves as a notice to the client that
there is a delegation conflict so it can take appropriate actions.
>> This patch addresses this issue by cancelling the CB_RECALL_ANY call from
>> the workqueue when the nfs4_client is about to be destroyed.
> Does CB_OFFLOAD need similar treatment?
Probably. The copy is already done anyway, this is just a notification.
-Dai
>
>
>> Signed-off-by: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com>
>> ---
>> fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c | 10 ++++++++++
>> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 10 +++++++++-
>> fs/nfsd/state.h | 1 +
>> 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c
>> index 87c9547989f6..e5b50c96be6a 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c
>> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c
>> @@ -1568,3 +1568,13 @@ bool nfsd4_run_cb(struct nfsd4_callback *cb)
>> nfsd41_cb_inflight_end(clp);
>> return queued;
>> }
>> +
>> +void nfsd41_cb_recall_any_cancel(struct nfs4_client *clp)
>> +{
>> + if (test_bit(NFSD4_CLIENT_CB_RECALL_ANY, &clp->cl_flags) &&
>> + cancel_delayed_work(&clp->cl_ra->ra_cb.cb_work)) {
>> + clear_bit(NFSD4_CLIENT_CB_RECALL_ANY, &clp->cl_flags);
>> + atomic_add_unless(&clp->cl_rpc_users, -1, 0);
>> + nfsd41_cb_inflight_end(clp);
>> + }
>> +}
>> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>> index 1a93c7fcf76c..0e1db57c9a19 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>> @@ -2402,6 +2402,7 @@ __destroy_client(struct nfs4_client *clp)
>> }
>> nfsd4_return_all_client_layouts(clp);
>> nfsd4_shutdown_copy(clp);
>> + nfsd41_cb_recall_any_cancel(clp);
>> nfsd4_shutdown_callback(clp);
>> if (clp->cl_cb_conn.cb_xprt)
>> svc_xprt_put(clp->cl_cb_conn.cb_xprt);
>> @@ -2980,6 +2981,12 @@ static void force_expire_client(struct nfs4_client *clp)
>> clp->cl_time = 0;
>> spin_unlock(&nn->client_lock);
>>
>> + /*
>> + * no need to send and wait for CB_RECALL_ANY
>> + * when client is about to be destroyed
>> + */
>> + nfsd41_cb_recall_any_cancel(clp);
>> +
>> wait_event(expiry_wq, atomic_read(&clp->cl_rpc_users) == 0);
>> spin_lock(&nn->client_lock);
>> already_expired = list_empty(&clp->cl_lru);
>> @@ -6617,7 +6624,8 @@ deleg_reaper(struct nfsd_net *nn)
>> clp->cl_ra->ra_bmval[0] = BIT(RCA4_TYPE_MASK_RDATA_DLG) |
>> BIT(RCA4_TYPE_MASK_WDATA_DLG);
>> trace_nfsd_cb_recall_any(clp->cl_ra);
>> - nfsd4_run_cb(&clp->cl_ra->ra_cb);
>> + if (!nfsd4_run_cb(&clp->cl_ra->ra_cb))
>> + clear_bit(NFSD4_CLIENT_CB_RECALL_ANY, &clp->cl_flags);
>> }
>> }
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/state.h b/fs/nfsd/state.h
>> index 01c6f3445646..259b4af7d226 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfsd/state.h
>> +++ b/fs/nfsd/state.h
>> @@ -735,6 +735,7 @@ extern void nfsd4_change_callback(struct nfs4_client *clp, struct nfs4_cb_conn *
>> extern void nfsd4_init_cb(struct nfsd4_callback *cb, struct nfs4_client *clp,
>> const struct nfsd4_callback_ops *ops, enum nfsd4_cb_op op);
>> extern bool nfsd4_run_cb(struct nfsd4_callback *cb);
>> +extern void nfsd41_cb_recall_any_cancel(struct nfs4_client *clp);
>> extern int nfsd4_create_callback_queue(void);
>> extern void nfsd4_destroy_callback_queue(void);
>> extern void nfsd4_shutdown_callback(struct nfs4_client *);
>> --
>> 2.39.3
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-28 1:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-26 18:13 [PATCH 1/1] NFSD: cancel CB_RECALL_ANY call when nfs4_client is about to be destroyed Dai Ngo
2024-03-26 18:27 ` Chuck Lever
2024-03-28 1:09 ` Dai Ngo [this message]
2024-03-28 14:08 ` Chuck Lever
2024-03-28 18:14 ` Dai Ngo
2024-03-29 0:31 ` Dai Ngo
2024-03-29 14:55 ` Chuck Lever
2024-03-29 17:57 ` Dai Ngo
2024-03-29 23:42 ` Chuck Lever
2024-03-30 17:46 ` Dai Ngo
2024-03-30 18:28 ` Chuck Lever
2024-03-30 23:30 ` Dai Ngo
2024-04-01 12:49 ` Jeff Layton
2024-04-01 13:34 ` Chuck Lever
2024-04-01 16:00 ` Dai Ngo
2024-04-01 16:46 ` Dai Ngo
2024-04-01 17:49 ` Chuck Lever
2024-04-01 19:55 ` Dai Ngo
2024-04-01 20:17 ` Dai Ngo
2024-04-02 13:58 ` Chuck Lever
2024-04-02 14:29 ` Dai Ngo
2024-04-01 16:11 ` Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=69914825-e9d5-4859-a5a8-60d17e8e8bf6@oracle.com \
--to=dai.ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox