Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Weston Andros Adamson <dros@primarydata.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Cc: linux-nfs list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFSv4.1/pnfs: replace broken pnfs_put_lseg_async
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 22:11:28 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <875DA1C9-2FD0-4176-9C63-7306CE4D2B53@primarydata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1412801200-17936-1-git-send-email-trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>

On Oct 8, 2014, at 4:46 PM, Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> wrote:

> You cannot call pnfs_put_lseg_async() more than once per lseg, so it
> is really an inappropriate way to deal with a refcount issue.

You’re absolutely right!

> Instead, replace it with a function that decrements the refcount, and
> puts the final 'free' operation (which is incompatible with locks) on
> the work queue.

Thanks, this looks like the right solution.

The good news is that nobody should have been hitting this, as the only file layout
server (that I know of) does stable writes, thus doesn’t use the commit path.

-dros

> 
> Cc: Weston Andros Adamson <dros@primarydata.com>
> Fixes: e6cf82d1830f: pnfs: add pnfs_put_lseg_async
> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
> ---
> fs/nfs/filelayout/filelayout.c |  2 +-
> fs/nfs/pnfs.c                  | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> fs/nfs/pnfs.h                  |  6 +-----
> 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/filelayout/filelayout.c b/fs/nfs/filelayout/filelayout.c
> index abc5056999d6..46fab1cb455a 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/filelayout/filelayout.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/filelayout/filelayout.c
> @@ -1031,7 +1031,7 @@ filelayout_clear_request_commit(struct nfs_page *req,
> 	}
> out:
> 	nfs_request_remove_commit_list(req, cinfo);
> -	pnfs_put_lseg_async(freeme);
> +	pnfs_put_lseg_locked(freeme);
> }
> 
> static void
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> index 76de7f568119..0a5dda4d85c2 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> @@ -361,22 +361,43 @@ pnfs_put_lseg(struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pnfs_put_lseg);
> 
> -static void pnfs_put_lseg_async_work(struct work_struct *work)
> +static void pnfs_free_lseg_async_work(struct work_struct *work)
> {
> 	struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg;
> +	struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo;
> 
> 	lseg = container_of(work, struct pnfs_layout_segment, pls_work);
> +	lo = lseg->pls_layout;
> 
> -	pnfs_put_lseg(lseg);
> +	pnfs_free_lseg(lseg);
> +	pnfs_put_layout_hdr(lo);
> }
> 
> -void
> -pnfs_put_lseg_async(struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg)
> +static void pnfs_free_lseg_async(struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg)
> {
> -	INIT_WORK(&lseg->pls_work, pnfs_put_lseg_async_work);
> +	INIT_WORK(&lseg->pls_work, pnfs_free_lseg_async_work);
> 	schedule_work(&lseg->pls_work);
> }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pnfs_put_lseg_async);
> +
> +void
> +pnfs_put_lseg_locked(struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg)
> +{
> +	if (!lseg)
> +		return;
> +
> +	assert_spin_locked(&lseg->pls_layout->plh_inode->i_lock);
> +
> +	dprintk("%s: lseg %p ref %d valid %d\n", __func__, lseg,
> +		atomic_read(&lseg->pls_refcount),
> +		test_bit(NFS_LSEG_VALID, &lseg->pls_flags));
> +	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&lseg->pls_refcount)) {
> +		struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo = lseg->pls_layout;
> +		pnfs_get_layout_hdr(lo);
> +		pnfs_layout_remove_lseg(lo, lseg);
> +		pnfs_free_lseg_async(lseg);
> +	}
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pnfs_put_lseg_locked);
> 
> static u64
> end_offset(u64 start, u64 len)
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.h b/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
> index 509a710148ba..9ae5b765b073 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
> +++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
> @@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ extern int nfs4_proc_layoutreturn(struct nfs4_layoutreturn *lrp);
> /* pnfs.c */
> void pnfs_get_layout_hdr(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo);
> void pnfs_put_lseg(struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg);
> -void pnfs_put_lseg_async(struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg);
> +void pnfs_put_lseg_locked(struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg);
> 
> void set_pnfs_layoutdriver(struct nfs_server *, const struct nfs_fh *, u32);
> void unset_pnfs_layoutdriver(struct nfs_server *);
> @@ -445,10 +445,6 @@ static inline void pnfs_put_lseg(struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg)
> {
> }
> 
> -static inline void pnfs_put_lseg_async(struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg)
> -{
> -}
> -
> static inline int pnfs_return_layout(struct inode *ino)
> {
> 	return 0;
> -- 
> 1.9.3
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-09  2:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-08 20:46 [PATCH] NFSv4.1/pnfs: replace broken pnfs_put_lseg_async Trond Myklebust
2014-10-09  2:11 ` Weston Andros Adamson [this message]
2014-10-09 16:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-10-09 18:36   ` Trond Myklebust

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=875DA1C9-2FD0-4176-9C63-7306CE4D2B53@primarydata.com \
    --to=dros@primarydata.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox