From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: releasing result pages in svc_xprt_release()
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2021 09:43:23 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87im7ffjp0.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <811BE98B-F196-4EC1-899F-6B62F313640C@oracle.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 929 bytes --]
On Fri, Jan 29 2021, Chuck Lever wrote:
> Hi Neil-
>
> I'd like to reduce the amount of page allocation that NFSD does,
> and was wondering about the release and reset of pages in
> svc_xprt_release(). This logic was added when the socket transport
> was converted to use kernel_sendpage() back in 2002. Do you
> remember why releasing the result pages is necessary?
>
Hi Chuck,
as I recall, kernel_sendpage() (or sock->ops->sendpage() as it was
then) takes a reference to the page and will hold that reference until
the content has been sent and ACKed. nfsd has no way to know when the
ACK comes, so cannot know when the page can be re-used, so it must
release the page and allocate a new one.
This is the price we pay for zero-copy, and I acknowledge that it is a
real price. I wouldn't be surprised if the trade-offs between
zero-copy and single-copy change over time, and between different
hardware.
NeilBrown
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 853 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-29 22:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-29 16:19 releasing result pages in svc_xprt_release() Chuck Lever
2021-01-29 22:43 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2021-01-29 23:06 ` Chuck Lever
2021-01-31 23:45 ` NeilBrown
2021-02-01 0:19 ` Chuck Lever
2021-02-01 23:27 ` NeilBrown
2021-02-05 20:20 ` Chuck Lever
2021-02-05 21:13 ` J. Bruce Fields
2021-02-06 17:59 ` Chuck Lever
2021-02-07 23:59 ` NeilBrown
2021-02-07 23:42 ` NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87im7ffjp0.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox