* [PATCH] netfs: Set NETFS_RREQ_WRITE_TO_CACHE when caching is possible [not found] ` <CAKPOu+-4LQM2-Ciro0LbbhVPa+YyHD3BnLL+drmG5Ca-b4wmLg@mail.gmail.com> @ 2024-08-04 13:57 ` Hristo Venev 2024-08-04 23:22 ` Trond Myklebust 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Hristo Venev @ 2024-08-04 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Max Kellermann, David Howells Cc: Ilya Dryomov, Xiubo Li, Jeff Layton, willy, ceph-devel, netfs, linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel, linux-nfs, blokos, Trond Myklebust, dan.aloni@vastdata.com [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1870 bytes --] In addition to Ceph, in NFS there are also some crashes related to the use of 0x356 as a pointer. `netfs_is_cache_enabled()` only returns true when the fscache cookie is fully initialized. This may happen after the request has been created, so check for the cookie's existence instead. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/b78c88db-8b3a-4008-94cb-82ae08f0e37b@free.fr/T/ Fixes: 2ff1e97587f4 ("netfs: Replace PG_fscache by setting folio->private and marking dirty") Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org> Cc: blokos <blokos@free.fr> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com> Cc: dan.aloni@vastdata.com <dan.aloni@vastdata.com> Signed-off-by: Hristo Venev <hristo@venev.name> --- fs/netfs/objects.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/netfs/objects.c b/fs/netfs/objects.c index f4a6427274792..a74ca90c86c9b 100644 --- a/fs/netfs/objects.c +++ b/fs/netfs/objects.c @@ -27,7 +27,6 @@ struct netfs_io_request *netfs_alloc_request(struct address_space *mapping, bool is_unbuffered = (origin == NETFS_UNBUFFERED_WRITE || origin == NETFS_DIO_READ || origin == NETFS_DIO_WRITE); - bool cached = !is_unbuffered && netfs_is_cache_enabled(ctx); int ret; for (;;) { @@ -56,8 +55,9 @@ struct netfs_io_request *netfs_alloc_request(struct address_space *mapping, refcount_set(&rreq->ref, 1); __set_bit(NETFS_RREQ_IN_PROGRESS, &rreq->flags); - if (cached) { - __set_bit(NETFS_RREQ_WRITE_TO_CACHE, &rreq->flags); + if (!is_unbuffered && fscache_cookie_valid(netfs_i_cookie(ctx))) { + if(netfs_is_cache_enabled(ctx)) + __set_bit(NETFS_RREQ_WRITE_TO_CACHE, &rreq->flags); if (test_bit(NETFS_ICTX_USE_PGPRIV2, &ctx->flags)) /* Filesystem uses deprecated PG_private_2 marking. */ __set_bit(NETFS_RREQ_USE_PGPRIV2, &rreq->flags); [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 858 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] netfs: Set NETFS_RREQ_WRITE_TO_CACHE when caching is possible 2024-08-04 13:57 ` [PATCH] netfs: Set NETFS_RREQ_WRITE_TO_CACHE when caching is possible Hristo Venev @ 2024-08-04 23:22 ` Trond Myklebust 2024-08-05 15:34 ` Hristo Venev 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Trond Myklebust @ 2024-08-04 23:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: max.kellermann@ionos.com, hristo@venev.name, dhowells@redhat.com Cc: dan.aloni@vastdata.com, xiubli@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netfs@lists.linux.dev, jlayton@kernel.org, idryomov@gmail.com, willy@infradead.org, blokos@free.fr, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2024-08-04 at 16:57 +0300, Hristo Venev wrote: > In addition to Ceph, in NFS there are also some crashes related to > the > use of 0x356 as a pointer. > > `netfs_is_cache_enabled()` only returns true when the fscache cookie > is > fully initialized. This may happen after the request has been > created, > so check for the cookie's existence instead. > > Link: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/b78c88db-8b3a-4008-94cb-82ae08f0e37b@free.fr/T/ > Fixes: 2ff1e97587f4 ("netfs: Replace PG_fscache by setting folio- > >private and marking dirty") > Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org> > Cc: blokos <blokos@free.fr> > Cc: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com> > Cc: dan.aloni@vastdata.com <dan.aloni@vastdata.com> > Signed-off-by: Hristo Venev <hristo@venev.name> > --- > fs/netfs/objects.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/netfs/objects.c b/fs/netfs/objects.c > index f4a6427274792..a74ca90c86c9b 100644 > --- a/fs/netfs/objects.c > +++ b/fs/netfs/objects.c > @@ -27,7 +27,6 @@ struct netfs_io_request *netfs_alloc_request(struct > address_space *mapping, > bool is_unbuffered = (origin == NETFS_UNBUFFERED_WRITE || > origin == NETFS_DIO_READ || > origin == NETFS_DIO_WRITE); > - bool cached = !is_unbuffered && netfs_is_cache_enabled(ctx); > int ret; > > for (;;) { > @@ -56,8 +55,9 @@ struct netfs_io_request *netfs_alloc_request(struct > address_space *mapping, > refcount_set(&rreq->ref, 1); > > __set_bit(NETFS_RREQ_IN_PROGRESS, &rreq->flags); > - if (cached) { > - __set_bit(NETFS_RREQ_WRITE_TO_CACHE, &rreq->flags); > + if (!is_unbuffered && > fscache_cookie_valid(netfs_i_cookie(ctx))) { > + if(netfs_is_cache_enabled(ctx)) > + __set_bit(NETFS_RREQ_WRITE_TO_CACHE, &rreq- > >flags); > if (test_bit(NETFS_ICTX_USE_PGPRIV2, &ctx->flags)) > /* Filesystem uses deprecated PG_private_2 > marking. */ > __set_bit(NETFS_RREQ_USE_PGPRIV2, &rreq- > >flags); Does this mean that netfs could still end up setting a value for folio- >private in NFS given some other set of circumstances? -- Trond Myklebust Linux NFS client maintainer, Hammerspace trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] netfs: Set NETFS_RREQ_WRITE_TO_CACHE when caching is possible 2024-08-04 23:22 ` Trond Myklebust @ 2024-08-05 15:34 ` Hristo Venev 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Hristo Venev @ 2024-08-05 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Trond Myklebust, max.kellermann@ionos.com, dhowells@redhat.com Cc: dan.aloni@vastdata.com, xiubli@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netfs@lists.linux.dev, jlayton@kernel.org, idryomov@gmail.com, willy@infradead.org, blokos@free.fr, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2752 bytes --] On Sun, 2024-08-04 at 23:22 +0000, Trond Myklebust wrote: > On Sun, 2024-08-04 at 16:57 +0300, Hristo Venev wrote: > > In addition to Ceph, in NFS there are also some crashes related to > > the > > use of 0x356 as a pointer. > > > > `netfs_is_cache_enabled()` only returns true when the fscache > > cookie > > is > > fully initialized. This may happen after the request has been > > created, > > so check for the cookie's existence instead. > > > > Link: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/b78c88db-8b3a-4008-94cb-82ae08f0e37b@free.fr/T/ > > Fixes: 2ff1e97587f4 ("netfs: Replace PG_fscache by setting folio- > > > private and marking dirty") > > Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org> > > Cc: blokos <blokos@free.fr> > > Cc: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com> > > Cc: dan.aloni@vastdata.com <dan.aloni@vastdata.com> > > Signed-off-by: Hristo Venev <hristo@venev.name> > > --- > > fs/netfs/objects.c | 6 +++--- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/fs/netfs/objects.c b/fs/netfs/objects.c > > index f4a6427274792..a74ca90c86c9b 100644 > > --- a/fs/netfs/objects.c > > +++ b/fs/netfs/objects.c > > @@ -27,7 +27,6 @@ struct netfs_io_request > > *netfs_alloc_request(struct > > address_space *mapping, > > bool is_unbuffered = (origin == NETFS_UNBUFFERED_WRITE || > > origin == NETFS_DIO_READ || > > origin == NETFS_DIO_WRITE); > > - bool cached = !is_unbuffered && > > netfs_is_cache_enabled(ctx); > > int ret; > > > > for (;;) { > > @@ -56,8 +55,9 @@ struct netfs_io_request > > *netfs_alloc_request(struct > > address_space *mapping, > > refcount_set(&rreq->ref, 1); > > > > __set_bit(NETFS_RREQ_IN_PROGRESS, &rreq->flags); > > - if (cached) { > > - __set_bit(NETFS_RREQ_WRITE_TO_CACHE, &rreq- > > >flags); > > + if (!is_unbuffered && > > fscache_cookie_valid(netfs_i_cookie(ctx))) { > > + if(netfs_is_cache_enabled(ctx)) > > + __set_bit(NETFS_RREQ_WRITE_TO_CACHE, > > &rreq- > > > flags); > > if (test_bit(NETFS_ICTX_USE_PGPRIV2, &ctx->flags)) > > /* Filesystem uses deprecated PG_private_2 > > marking. */ > > __set_bit(NETFS_RREQ_USE_PGPRIV2, &rreq- > > > flags); > > Does this mean that netfs could still end up setting a value for > folio- > > private in NFS given some other set of circumstances? Hopefully not? For NFS the cookie should be allocated in `nfs_fscache_init_inode`, and for Ceph I think `ceph_fill_inode` (which calls `ceph_fscache_register_inode_cookie`) should also be called early enough as well. > -- > Trond Myklebust > Linux NFS client maintainer, Hammerspace > trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com > > [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-08-05 15:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20240729091532.855688-1-max.kellermann@ionos.com>
[not found] ` <3575457.1722355300@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
[not found] ` <CAKPOu+9_TQx8XaB2gDKzwN-YoN69uKoZGiCDPQjz5fO-2ztdFQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAKPOu+-4C7qPrOEe=trhmpqoC-UhCLdHGmeyjzaUymg=k93NEA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <3717298.1722422465@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
[not found] ` <CAKPOu+-4LQM2-Ciro0LbbhVPa+YyHD3BnLL+drmG5Ca-b4wmLg@mail.gmail.com>
2024-08-04 13:57 ` [PATCH] netfs: Set NETFS_RREQ_WRITE_TO_CACHE when caching is possible Hristo Venev
2024-08-04 23:22 ` Trond Myklebust
2024-08-05 15:34 ` Hristo Venev
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox