Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>,
	Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@netapp.com>,
	hch@infradead.org
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 02/10] NFS: Move the flock open mode check into nfs_flock()
Date: Mon,  7 Dec 2015 11:26:01 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cc80e246ee323a21f3f318248bf38eda668e8eb9.1449503713.git.bcodding@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1449503713.git.bcodding@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1449503713.git.bcodding@redhat.com>

We only need to check lock exclusive/shared types against open mode when
flock() is used on NFS, so move it into the flock-specific path instead of
checking it for all locks.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
---
 fs/nfs/file.c     |   15 +++++++++++++++
 fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c |   13 -------------
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/file.c b/fs/nfs/file.c
index 93e2364..ec16abc 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/file.c
@@ -893,6 +893,21 @@ int nfs_flock(struct file *filp, int cmd, struct file_lock *fl)
 	/* We're simulating flock() locks using posix locks on the server */
 	if (fl->fl_type == F_UNLCK)
 		return do_unlk(filp, cmd, fl, is_local);
+
+	/*
+	 * Don't rely on the VFS having checked the file open mode,
+	 * since it won't do this for flock() locks.
+	 */
+	switch (fl->fl_type) {
+	case F_RDLCK:
+		if (!(filp->f_mode & FMODE_READ))
+			return -EBADF;
+		break;
+	case F_WRLCK:
+		if (!(filp->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE))
+			return -EBADF;
+	}
+
 	return do_setlk(filp, cmd, fl, is_local);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nfs_flock);
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index 2231d7d..05ea1e1 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -6125,19 +6125,6 @@ nfs4_proc_lock(struct file *filp, int cmd, struct file_lock *request)
 
 	if (state == NULL)
 		return -ENOLCK;
-	/*
-	 * Don't rely on the VFS having checked the file open mode,
-	 * since it won't do this for flock() locks.
-	 */
-	switch (request->fl_type) {
-	case F_RDLCK:
-		if (!(filp->f_mode & FMODE_READ))
-			return -EBADF;
-		break;
-	case F_WRLCK:
-		if (!(filp->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE))
-			return -EBADF;
-	}
 
 	do {
 		status = nfs4_proc_setlk(state, cmd, request);
-- 
1.7.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-12-07 16:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-07 16:25 [PATCH v2 00/10] locking fixups for NFS Benjamin Coddington
2015-12-07 16:26 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] NFS4: remove a redundant lock range check Benjamin Coddington
2015-12-07 16:26 ` Benjamin Coddington [this message]
2015-12-07 18:40   ` [PATCH v2 02/10] NFS: Move the flock open mode check into nfs_flock() Christoph Hellwig
2015-12-07 19:13     ` Benjamin Coddington
2015-12-07 19:22       ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-12-07 19:24         ` Benjamin Coddington
2015-12-27  3:13           ` Trond Myklebust
2015-12-28 15:53             ` Benjamin Coddington
2015-12-07 19:18     ` Jeff Layton
2015-12-07 16:26 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] NFS: Pass nfs_open_context instead of file to the lock procs Benjamin Coddington
2015-12-07 16:26 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] NFSv4: Pass nfs_open_context instead of nfs4_state to nfs4_proc_unlck() Benjamin Coddington
2015-12-07 16:26 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] lockd: Plumb nfs_open_context into nlm client unlock Benjamin Coddington
2015-12-07 16:26 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] lockd: Send the inode to nlmclnt_setlockargs() Benjamin Coddington
2015-12-07 16:26 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] lockd: do_vfs_lock() only needs the inode Benjamin Coddington
2015-12-07 16:26 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] locks: Set FL_CLOSE when removing flock locks on close() Benjamin Coddington
2015-12-07 16:26 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] NFS: Deferred unlocks - always unlock on FL_CLOSE Benjamin Coddington
2015-12-07 16:26 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] NFS: cleanup do_vfs_lock() Benjamin Coddington

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cc80e246ee323a21f3f318248bf38eda668e8eb9.1449503713.git.bcodding@redhat.com \
    --to=bcodding@redhat.com \
    --cc=anna.schumaker@netapp.com \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jlayton@poochiereds.net \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox