From: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@netapp.com>,
hch@infradead.org
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 02/10] NFS: Move the flock open mode check into nfs_flock()
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 11:26:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cc80e246ee323a21f3f318248bf38eda668e8eb9.1449503713.git.bcodding@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1449503713.git.bcodding@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1449503713.git.bcodding@redhat.com>
We only need to check lock exclusive/shared types against open mode when
flock() is used on NFS, so move it into the flock-specific path instead of
checking it for all locks.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
---
fs/nfs/file.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 13 -------------
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/file.c b/fs/nfs/file.c
index 93e2364..ec16abc 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/file.c
@@ -893,6 +893,21 @@ int nfs_flock(struct file *filp, int cmd, struct file_lock *fl)
/* We're simulating flock() locks using posix locks on the server */
if (fl->fl_type == F_UNLCK)
return do_unlk(filp, cmd, fl, is_local);
+
+ /*
+ * Don't rely on the VFS having checked the file open mode,
+ * since it won't do this for flock() locks.
+ */
+ switch (fl->fl_type) {
+ case F_RDLCK:
+ if (!(filp->f_mode & FMODE_READ))
+ return -EBADF;
+ break;
+ case F_WRLCK:
+ if (!(filp->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE))
+ return -EBADF;
+ }
+
return do_setlk(filp, cmd, fl, is_local);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nfs_flock);
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index 2231d7d..05ea1e1 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -6125,19 +6125,6 @@ nfs4_proc_lock(struct file *filp, int cmd, struct file_lock *request)
if (state == NULL)
return -ENOLCK;
- /*
- * Don't rely on the VFS having checked the file open mode,
- * since it won't do this for flock() locks.
- */
- switch (request->fl_type) {
- case F_RDLCK:
- if (!(filp->f_mode & FMODE_READ))
- return -EBADF;
- break;
- case F_WRLCK:
- if (!(filp->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE))
- return -EBADF;
- }
do {
status = nfs4_proc_setlk(state, cmd, request);
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-07 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-07 16:25 [PATCH v2 00/10] locking fixups for NFS Benjamin Coddington
2015-12-07 16:26 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] NFS4: remove a redundant lock range check Benjamin Coddington
2015-12-07 16:26 ` Benjamin Coddington [this message]
2015-12-07 18:40 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] NFS: Move the flock open mode check into nfs_flock() Christoph Hellwig
2015-12-07 19:13 ` Benjamin Coddington
2015-12-07 19:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-12-07 19:24 ` Benjamin Coddington
2015-12-27 3:13 ` Trond Myklebust
2015-12-28 15:53 ` Benjamin Coddington
2015-12-07 19:18 ` Jeff Layton
2015-12-07 16:26 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] NFS: Pass nfs_open_context instead of file to the lock procs Benjamin Coddington
2015-12-07 16:26 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] NFSv4: Pass nfs_open_context instead of nfs4_state to nfs4_proc_unlck() Benjamin Coddington
2015-12-07 16:26 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] lockd: Plumb nfs_open_context into nlm client unlock Benjamin Coddington
2015-12-07 16:26 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] lockd: Send the inode to nlmclnt_setlockargs() Benjamin Coddington
2015-12-07 16:26 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] lockd: do_vfs_lock() only needs the inode Benjamin Coddington
2015-12-07 16:26 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] locks: Set FL_CLOSE when removing flock locks on close() Benjamin Coddington
2015-12-07 16:26 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] NFS: Deferred unlocks - always unlock on FL_CLOSE Benjamin Coddington
2015-12-07 16:26 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] NFS: cleanup do_vfs_lock() Benjamin Coddington
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cc80e246ee323a21f3f318248bf38eda668e8eb9.1449503713.git.bcodding@redhat.com \
--to=bcodding@redhat.com \
--cc=anna.schumaker@netapp.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jlayton@poochiereds.net \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox