From: Aaron Wiebe <epiphani@gmail.com>
To: Tom Talpey <tmtalpey@gmail.com>
Cc: Frank Steiner
<fsteiner-mail1-G0GEQqhI7DhYiKXMg8wJIg@public.gmane.org>,
Leonardo Chiquitto <leonardo.lists@gmail.com>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [NFS] nfs-over-tcp still needs udp ports? (SLES 11)
Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 14:08:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e7ca40f70905071108v62fc3d7ds3174ddaf0e73c6a8@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4a031594.1c1d640a.6d45.5fed-ATjtLOhZ0NVl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Tom Talpey <tmtalpey@gmail.com> wrote:
> At 12:42 PM 5/7/2009, Chuck Lever wrote:
>>It's not portmap... lockd decides which listeners to start.
Thanks Chuck and Tom - that clarifies it.
Take care,
-Aaron
> Also, there is an important distinction between NLM and NLM *callback=
s*.
> The NLM client follows the NFS protocol selection in many client kern=
els,
> i.e. if you mount with proto=3Dtcp, you get both NFS and NLM over TCP=
=2E
>
> The issue is NLM callbacks, which are used only in specific cases whe=
re
> clients take blocking locks, which actually need to block due to bein=
g already
> held by another client. The server replies over NLM (e.g. TCP) with a=
n indication
> that a callback will arive later. But when the other lock is released=
, the callback
> comes on a second connection, initiated from the server back to the c=
lient and
> not on the original NLM channel. To make matters worse, some servers =
only
> ever perform the callback on UDP in order to simplify and reduce the =
overhead
> required.
>
> If this callback doesn't arrive at the client, or arrives in such a w=
ay that
> it's not recognized (e.g traverses a NAT and therefore changes source=
IP),
> then the client only wakes up on a timer. The long pauses can be a re=
al
> problem, and one which only arises occasionally - i.e. very hard to t=
race down.
>
> Just something to be aware of... it's a day-one defect in the NLM pro=
tocol,
> actually.
>
> Tom.
>
>>
>>> =A0I know there
>>> are servers out there that will always speak NLM over UDP
>>> (netapp/ontap being the prominent one), and as a result there can b=
e
>>> problems without firewalls. =A0If servers are out there that will s=
peak
>>> NLM over UDP regardless of the mount itself, shouldn't we be bindin=
g
>>> NLM/UDP regardless of the mount transport?
>>>
>>> (Or did I miss this change being reverted a while back?)
>>
>>This change was reverted upstream; see commit 8c3916f4.
>>
>>--
>>Chuck Lever
>>chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com
>>
>
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------=
-------
The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! You=
r
production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks=
to
Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODA=
K i700
Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image=20
processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
_______________________________________________
Please note that nfs@lists.sourceforge.net is being discontinued.
Please subscribe to linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org instead.
http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.html#linux-nfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-07 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-07 12:57 [NFS] nfs-over-tcp still needs udp ports? (SLES 11) Frank Steiner
2009-05-07 13:34 ` Leonardo Chiquitto
[not found] ` <c2d0b6ec0905070634p6888226cx5b2c8abae51cd1be-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-05-07 15:26 ` Frank Steiner
[not found] ` <4A02FDC3.9090709-G0GEQqhI7DhYiKXMg8wJIg@public.gmane.org>
2009-05-07 15:35 ` Tom Talpey
[not found] ` <4a02ffdf.1ac1f10a.637d.ffffbc3a-ATjtLOhZ0NVl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
2009-05-07 16:08 ` Aaron Wiebe
[not found] ` <e7ca40f70905070908p595c1d23gef745a122ae09caa-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-05-07 16:42 ` Chuck Lever
2009-05-07 17:08 ` Tom Talpey
[not found] ` <4a031594.1c1d640a.6d45.5fed-ATjtLOhZ0NVl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
2009-05-07 18:08 ` Aaron Wiebe [this message]
2009-05-08 6:03 ` Frank Steiner
[not found] ` <4A03CB1C.7020703-G0GEQqhI7DhYiKXMg8wJIg@public.gmane.org>
2009-05-08 12:27 ` Trond Myklebust
2009-05-11 14:59 ` Tom Talpey
[not found] ` <4a083d44.85c2f10a.4cf7.ffff85fb-ATjtLOhZ0NVl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
2009-05-11 16:59 ` Chuck Lever
2009-05-12 13:51 ` Frank Steiner
2009-05-15 6:38 ` Frank Steiner
[not found] ` <4A0D0DFE.6040108-G0GEQqhI7DhYiKXMg8wJIg@public.gmane.org>
2009-05-15 13:48 ` Tom Talpey
[not found] ` <4a0d72a6.c5c2f10a.368f.5cc5-ATjtLOhZ0NVl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
2009-05-18 9:18 ` Frank Steiner
[not found] ` <4A1127CE.5030701-G0GEQqhI7DhYiKXMg8wJIg@public.gmane.org>
2009-05-18 12:53 ` Tom Talpey
[not found] ` <4a115a4c.47c1f10a.53d0.ffff96cc-ATjtLOhZ0NVl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
2009-05-22 11:05 ` Frank Steiner
[not found] ` <4A02DAA8.6050005-G0GEQqhI7DhYiKXMg8wJIg@public.gmane.org>
2009-05-07 13:52 ` Trond Myklebust
[not found] ` <1241704326.4884.10.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2009-05-07 14:03 ` Peter Åstrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e7ca40f70905071108v62fc3d7ds3174ddaf0e73c6a8@mail.gmail.com \
--to=epiphani@gmail.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=fsteiner-mail1-G0GEQqhI7DhYiKXMg8wJIg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=leonardo.lists@gmail.com \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=tmtalpey@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox