* Question on porting nilfs back to linux 2.4.3
@ 2008-01-09 19:13 Jiwon Seo
[not found] ` <b008462b0801091113w620d9321p21de1d76f8dd3e8c-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jiwon Seo @ 2008-01-09 19:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: users-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg
For some reason, I might need to use nilfs on linux kernel version
2.4.3. Since quite significant work seems necessary to upgrade linux
version (it's running on a FPGA based system with much code depending
on linux kernel 2.4.3), I'm thinking of porting nilfs for 2.4.3
to compare the cost, I'd like to see your opinions on how difficult it
would be to port nilfs for linux 2.4.3. What parts are depending on
kernel 2.6, and how difficult do you think it is to change the part
for linux 2.4.3?
Thanks
Jiwon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread[parent not found: <b008462b0801091113w620d9321p21de1d76f8dd3e8c-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: Question on porting nilfs back to linux 2.4.3 [not found] ` <b008462b0801091113w620d9321p21de1d76f8dd3e8c-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-01-11 11:52 ` Chris Samuel 2008-01-12 7:57 ` amagai-sG5X7nlA6pw 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Chris Samuel @ 2008-01-11 11:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: users-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 381 bytes --] On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, Jiwon Seo wrote: > I'm thinking of porting nilfs for 2.4.3 That kernel is almost 7 years old! I suspect you'd be very hard pressed to get it to work.. :-( -- Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : Melbourne, VIC This email may come with a PGP signature as a file. Do not panic. For more info see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenPGP [-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part. --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 481 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 158 bytes --] _______________________________________________ users mailing list users-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org https://www.nilfs.org/mailman/listinfo/users ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Question on porting nilfs back to linux 2.4.3 [not found] ` <b008462b0801091113w620d9321p21de1d76f8dd3e8c-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 2008-01-11 11:52 ` Chris Samuel @ 2008-01-12 7:57 ` amagai-sG5X7nlA6pw 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: amagai-sG5X7nlA6pw @ 2008-01-12 7:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: users-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg Hi, thank you for your interest on NILFS, here is a not good news. > on linux kernel 2.4.3), I'm thinking of porting nilfs for 2.4.3 NILFS is depended heavily on Linux kernel 2.6, especially page cache operations, buffer head operations, memory shrinker, block I/O mechanism and so on. It should be a very hard work to port nilfs to 2.4.3. Amagai Yoshiji NILFS team, NTT http://www.nilfs.org/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-01-12 7:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-01-09 19:13 Question on porting nilfs back to linux 2.4.3 Jiwon Seo
[not found] ` <b008462b0801091113w620d9321p21de1d76f8dd3e8c-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2008-01-11 11:52 ` Chris Samuel
2008-01-12 7:57 ` amagai-sG5X7nlA6pw
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox