Linux NILFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Physical block addresses?
@ 2008-01-28 17:48 Sivan Toledo
       [not found] ` <196f72b10801280948uc9e1275o6c4bf1bf56cd26c2-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sivan Toledo @ 2008-01-28 17:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: users-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg

Hi,

I am trying to figure out whether NILFS uses physical block addresses
as pointers in inodes and indirect blocks, but I could not figure this
out from the papers.

Does it? If so, I assume that when cleaning a segment and copying live
data to a new segment, each relocated block causes the propagation of
dirty blocks (because some other blocks point to the old segment, so
they need to be modified, and so on. Is that correct?

Thanks, Sivan Toledo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-01-31  6:25 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-01-28 17:48 Physical block addresses? Sivan Toledo
     [not found] ` <196f72b10801280948uc9e1275o6c4bf1bf56cd26c2-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2008-01-31  6:25   ` Koji Sato

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox