From: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
To: Cliff Wickman <cpi@sgi.com>
Cc: Kornilios Kourtis <kkourt@cslab.ece.ntua.gr>,
Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr>,
linux-numa@vger.kernel.org, eric.whitney@hp.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] numactl/libnuma - Possibly already fixed leaks and cleanup
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:36:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090428163627.24945.23606.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090428163621.24945.95516.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>
[PATCH 01/08] Possibly already fixed leaks and cleanup
Against: numactl-2.0.3-rc2
Kornilios says these [Hunks #1 and 3] are already fixed,
so I pulled them into a separate patch.
Hunk #2 that modifies numa_alloc_local() just reorganizes the code
to match the structure of numa_alloc_onnode() with, I think, no change
in behavior. This is probably not "already fixed".
I suppose I could/should change those '(char *)-1's to MAP_FAILED, too...
libnuma.c | 22 ++++++++++++++--------
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Index: numactl-2.0.3-rc2/libnuma.c
===================================================================
--- numactl-2.0.3-rc2.orig/libnuma.c 2009-04-27 08:47:14.000000000 -0400
+++ numactl-2.0.3-rc2/libnuma.c 2009-04-27 09:01:33.000000000 -0400
@@ -919,8 +919,10 @@ void *numa_alloc_onnode(size_t size, int
mem = mmap(0, size, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS,
0, 0);
if (mem == (char *)-1)
- return NULL;
- dombind(mem, size, bind_policy, bmp);
+ mem = NULL;
+ else
+ dombind(mem, size, bind_policy, bmp);
+ numa_bitmask_free(bmp);
return mem;
}
@@ -930,8 +932,9 @@ void *numa_alloc_local(size_t size)
mem = mmap(0, size, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS,
0, 0);
if (mem == (char *)-1)
- return NULL;
- dombind(mem, size, MPOL_PREFERRED, NULL);
+ mem = NULL;
+ else
+ dombind(mem, size, MPOL_PREFERRED, NULL);
return mem;
}
@@ -1496,7 +1499,7 @@ int numa_run_on_node(int node)
int numa_preferred(void)
{
- int policy;
+ int policy, node = 0;
struct bitmask *bmp;
bmp = numa_allocate_nodemask();
@@ -1505,12 +1508,15 @@ int numa_preferred(void)
int i;
int max = numa_num_possible_nodes();
for (i = 0; i < max ; i++)
- if (numa_bitmask_isbitset(bmp, i))
- return i;
+ if (numa_bitmask_isbitset(bmp, i)) {
+ node = i;
+ break;
+ }
}
/* could read the current CPU from /proc/self/status. Probably
not worth it. */
- return 0; /* or random one? */
+ numa_bitmask_free(bmp);
+ return node;
}
void numa_set_preferred(int node)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-28 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-28 16:36 [PATCH 0/8] numactl/libnuma - Fixes and Cleanup Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` Lee Schermerhorn [this message]
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 2/8] numactl/libnuma - Simple bitmask leak fixes Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 3/8] numactl/libnuma - more " Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 4/8] numactl/libnuma - return freeable bitmasks Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 5/8] numactl/libnuma - fix parsing of cpu, node mask Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 6/8] numactl/numademo - eliminate page allocation overhead from memtest measurements Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:37 ` [PATCH 7/8] numactl/Makefile - Generalize Makefile .so Version Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:46 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-28 17:01 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 17:10 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-28 16:37 ` [PATCH 8/8] numactl/test - Make checkaffinity more robust Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 19:38 ` [PATCH 0/8] numactl/libnuma - Fixes and Cleanup Cliff Wickman
2009-04-28 20:08 ` Lee Schermerhorn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090428163627.24945.23606.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain \
--to=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=Brice.Goglin@inria.fr \
--cc=cpi@sgi.com \
--cc=eric.whitney@hp.com \
--cc=kkourt@cslab.ece.ntua.gr \
--cc=linux-numa@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox