From: jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com (jianchao.wang)
Subject: [PATCH V5 0/2] nvme-pci: fix the timeout case when reset is ongoing
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 16:14:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0639aa2f-d153-5aac-ce08-df0d4b45f9a0@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180119080130.GE12043@localhost.localdomain>
Hi Keith
Thanks for your time to look into this.
On 01/19/2018 04:01 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018@06:10:00PM +0800, Jianchao Wang wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> Please consider the following scenario.
>> nvme_reset_ctrl
>> -> set state to RESETTING
>> -> queue reset_work
>> (scheduling)
>> nvme_reset_work
>> -> nvme_dev_disable
>> -> quiesce queues
>> -> nvme_cancel_request
>> on outstanding requests
>> -------------------------------_boundary_
>> -> nvme initializing (issue request on adminq)
>>
>> Before the _boundary_, not only quiesce the queues, but only cancel
>> all the outstanding requests.
>>
>> A request could expire when the ctrl state is RESETTING.
>> - If the timeout occur before the _boundary_, the expired requests
>> are from the previous work.
>> - Otherwise, the expired requests are from the controller initializing
>> procedure, such as sending cq/sq create commands to adminq to setup
>> io queues.
>> In current implementation, nvme_timeout cannot identify the _boundary_
>> so only handles second case above.
>
> Bare with me a moment, as I'm only just now getting a real chance to look
> at this, and I'm not quite sure I follow what problem this is solving.
>
> The nvme_dev_disable routine makes forward progress without depending on
> timeout handling to complete expired commands. Once controller disabling
> completes, there can't possibly be any started requests that can expire.
> So we don't need nvme_timeout to do anything for requests above the
> boundary.
>
Yes, once controller disabling completes, any started requests will be handled and cannot expire.
But before the _boundary_, there could be a nvme_timeout context runs with nvme_dev_disable in parallel.
If a timeout path grabs a request, then nvme_dev_disable cannot get and cancel it.
So even though the nvme_dev_disable completes, there still could be a request in nvme_timeout context.
The worst case is :
nvme_timeout nvme_reset_work
if (ctrl->state == RESETTING ) nvme_dev_disable
nvme_dev_disable initializing procedure
the nvme_dev_disable run with reinit procedure in nvme_reset_work in parallel.
Thanks
Jianchao
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-19 8:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-18 10:10 [PATCH V5 0/2] nvme-pci: fix the timeout case when reset is ongoing Jianchao Wang
2018-01-18 10:10 ` [PATCH V5 1/2] nvme-pci: introduce RECONNECTING state to mark initializing procedure Jianchao Wang
2018-01-18 10:17 ` Max Gurtovoy
2018-01-19 9:49 ` jianchao.wang
2018-01-18 15:23 ` James Smart
2018-01-18 10:10 ` [PATCH V5 2/2] nvme-pci: fixup the timeout case when reset is ongoing Jianchao Wang
2018-01-19 4:59 ` Keith Busch
2018-01-19 5:55 ` jianchao.wang
2018-01-19 6:05 ` Keith Busch
2018-01-19 6:53 ` jianchao.wang
2018-01-18 15:34 ` [PATCH V5 0/2] nvme-pci: fix " James Smart
2018-01-19 8:01 ` Keith Busch
2018-01-19 8:14 ` jianchao.wang [this message]
2018-01-19 8:42 ` Keith Busch
2018-01-19 9:02 ` jianchao.wang
2018-01-19 11:52 ` Keith Busch
2018-01-19 13:56 ` jianchao.wang
2018-01-20 2:11 ` Keith Busch
2018-01-20 14:07 ` jianchao.wang
2018-01-20 14:14 ` jianchao.wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0639aa2f-d153-5aac-ce08-df0d4b45f9a0@oracle.com \
--to=jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox