Linux-NVME Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com (jianchao.wang)
Subject: [PATCH V5 0/2] nvme-pci: fix the timeout case when reset is ongoing
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 16:14:02 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0639aa2f-d153-5aac-ce08-df0d4b45f9a0@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180119080130.GE12043@localhost.localdomain>

Hi Keith

Thanks for your time to look into this.

On 01/19/2018 04:01 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018@06:10:00PM +0800, Jianchao Wang wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> Please consider the following scenario.
>> nvme_reset_ctrl
>>   -> set state to RESETTING
>>   -> queue reset_work       
>>     (scheduling)
>> nvme_reset_work
>>   -> nvme_dev_disable
>>     -> quiesce queues
>>     -> nvme_cancel_request 
>>        on outstanding requests
>> -------------------------------_boundary_
>>   -> nvme initializing (issue request on adminq)
>>
>> Before the _boundary_, not only quiesce the queues, but only cancel
>> all the outstanding requests.
>>
>> A request could expire when the ctrl state is RESETTING.
>>  - If the timeout occur before the _boundary_, the expired requests
>>    are from the previous work.
>>  - Otherwise, the expired requests are from the controller initializing
>>    procedure, such as sending cq/sq create commands to adminq to setup
>>    io queues.
>> In current implementation, nvme_timeout cannot identify the _boundary_ 
>> so only handles second case above.
> 
> Bare with me a moment, as I'm only just now getting a real chance to look
> at this, and I'm not quite sure I follow what problem this is solving.
> 
> The nvme_dev_disable routine makes forward progress without depending on
> timeout handling to complete expired commands. Once controller disabling
> completes, there can't possibly be any started requests that can expire.
> So we don't need nvme_timeout to do anything for requests above the
> boundary.
> 
Yes, once controller disabling completes, any started requests will be handled and cannot expire.
But before the _boundary_, there could be a nvme_timeout context runs with nvme_dev_disable in parallel.
If a timeout path grabs a request, then nvme_dev_disable cannot get and cancel it.
So even though the nvme_dev_disable completes, there still could be a request in nvme_timeout context.

The worst case is :
nvme_timeout                              nvme_reset_work
if (ctrl->state == RESETTING )              nvme_dev_disable
    nvme_dev_disable                        initializing procedure

the nvme_dev_disable run with reinit procedure in nvme_reset_work in parallel.


Thanks
Jianchao

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-19  8:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-18 10:10 [PATCH V5 0/2] nvme-pci: fix the timeout case when reset is ongoing Jianchao Wang
2018-01-18 10:10 ` [PATCH V5 1/2] nvme-pci: introduce RECONNECTING state to mark initializing procedure Jianchao Wang
2018-01-18 10:17   ` Max Gurtovoy
2018-01-19  9:49     ` jianchao.wang
2018-01-18 15:23   ` James Smart
2018-01-18 10:10 ` [PATCH V5 2/2] nvme-pci: fixup the timeout case when reset is ongoing Jianchao Wang
2018-01-19  4:59   ` Keith Busch
2018-01-19  5:55     ` jianchao.wang
2018-01-19  6:05       ` Keith Busch
2018-01-19  6:53         ` jianchao.wang
2018-01-18 15:34 ` [PATCH V5 0/2] nvme-pci: fix " James Smart
2018-01-19  8:01 ` Keith Busch
2018-01-19  8:14   ` jianchao.wang [this message]
2018-01-19  8:42     ` Keith Busch
2018-01-19  9:02       ` jianchao.wang
2018-01-19 11:52         ` Keith Busch
2018-01-19 13:56           ` jianchao.wang
2018-01-20  2:11             ` Keith Busch
2018-01-20 14:07               ` jianchao.wang
2018-01-20 14:14                 ` jianchao.wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0639aa2f-d153-5aac-ce08-df0d4b45f9a0@oracle.com \
    --to=jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox