From: jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com (jianchao.wang)
Subject: [PATCH V5 0/2] nvme-pci: fix the timeout case when reset is ongoing
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 21:56:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3cc0d180-0b7e-e71f-66ce-43f4dfffb701@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180119115255.GH12043@localhost.localdomain>
Hi Keith
Thanks for your kindly response.
On 01/19/2018 07:52 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018@05:02:06PM +0800, jianchao.wang wrote:
>> We should not use blk_sync_queue here, the requeue_work and run_work will be canceled.
>> Just flush_work(&q->timeout_work) should be ok.
>
> I agree flushing timeout_work is sufficient. All the other work had
> already better not be running either, so it doesn't hurt to call the
> sync API.
In nvme_dev_disable, the outstanding requests will be requeued finally.
I'm afraid the requests requeued on the q->requeue_list will be blocked until another requeue
occurs, if we cancel the requeue work before it get scheduled.
>
>> In addition, we could check NVME_CC_ENABLE in nvme_dev_disable to avoid redundant invoking.
>> :)
>
> That should already be inferred through reading back the CSTS register.
>
Yes, the "dead" in nvme_dev_disable looks enough for these uncommon cases.
Thanks
Jianchao
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-19 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-18 10:10 [PATCH V5 0/2] nvme-pci: fix the timeout case when reset is ongoing Jianchao Wang
2018-01-18 10:10 ` [PATCH V5 1/2] nvme-pci: introduce RECONNECTING state to mark initializing procedure Jianchao Wang
2018-01-18 10:17 ` Max Gurtovoy
2018-01-19 9:49 ` jianchao.wang
2018-01-18 15:23 ` James Smart
2018-01-18 10:10 ` [PATCH V5 2/2] nvme-pci: fixup the timeout case when reset is ongoing Jianchao Wang
2018-01-19 4:59 ` Keith Busch
2018-01-19 5:55 ` jianchao.wang
2018-01-19 6:05 ` Keith Busch
2018-01-19 6:53 ` jianchao.wang
2018-01-18 15:34 ` [PATCH V5 0/2] nvme-pci: fix " James Smart
2018-01-19 8:01 ` Keith Busch
2018-01-19 8:14 ` jianchao.wang
2018-01-19 8:42 ` Keith Busch
2018-01-19 9:02 ` jianchao.wang
2018-01-19 11:52 ` Keith Busch
2018-01-19 13:56 ` jianchao.wang [this message]
2018-01-20 2:11 ` Keith Busch
2018-01-20 14:07 ` jianchao.wang
2018-01-20 14:14 ` jianchao.wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3cc0d180-0b7e-e71f-66ce-43f4dfffb701@oracle.com \
--to=jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox