From: axboe@kernel.dk (Jens Axboe)
Subject: block and nvme polling improvements V3
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 11:40:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <11a7106d-17e2-ceb4-bc16-22b447d0bc0f@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181202164628.1116-1-hch@lst.de>
On 12/2/18 9:46 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this series optimizes a few bits in the block layer and nvme code
> related to polling.
>
> It starts by moving the queue types recently introduce entirely into
> the block layer instead of requiring an indirect call for them.
>
> It then switches nvme and the block layer to only allow polling
> with separate poll queues, which allows us to realize the following
> benefits:
>
> - poll queues can safely avoid disabling irqs on any locks
> (we already do that in NVMe, but it isn't 100% kosher as-is)
> - regular interrupt driven queues can drop the CQ lock entirely,
> as we won't race for completing CQs
>
> Then we drop the NVMe RDMA code, as it doesn't follow the new mode,
> and remove the nvme multipath polling code including the block hooks
> for it, which didn't make much sense to start with given that we
> started bypassing the multipath code for single controller subsystems
> early on. Last but not least we enable polling in the block layer
> by default if the underlying driver has poll queues, as that already
> requires explicit user action.
>
> Note that it would be really nice to have polling back for RDMA with
> dedicated poll queues, but that might take a while. Also based on
> Jens' polling aio patches we could now implement a model in nvmet
> where we have a thread polling both the backend nvme device and
> the RDMA CQs, which might give us some pretty nice performace
> (I know Sagi looked into something similar a while ago).
Applied, thanks.
--
Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-04 18:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-02 16:46 block and nvme polling improvements V3 Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-02 16:46 ` [PATCH 01/13] block: move queues types to the block layer Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-04 0:49 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-12-04 15:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-04 17:08 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-12-02 16:46 ` [PATCH 02/13] nvme-pci: use atomic bitops to mark a queue enabled Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-04 0:54 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-12-04 15:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-04 17:11 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-12-02 16:46 ` [PATCH 03/13] nvme-pci: cleanup SQ allocation a bit Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-04 0:55 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-12-02 16:46 ` [PATCH 04/13] nvme-pci: only allow polling with separate poll queues Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-03 18:23 ` Keith Busch
2018-12-04 0:56 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-12-02 16:46 ` [PATCH 05/13] nvme-pci: consolidate code for polling non-dedicated queues Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-04 0:58 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-12-04 15:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-04 17:13 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-12-04 18:19 ` Jens Axboe
2018-12-02 16:46 ` [PATCH 06/13] nvme-pci: refactor nvme_disable_io_queues Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-04 1:00 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-12-04 15:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-04 18:19 ` Jens Axboe
2018-12-02 16:46 ` [PATCH 07/13] nvme-pci: don't poll from irq context when deleting queues Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-03 18:15 ` Keith Busch
2018-12-04 1:05 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-12-02 16:46 ` [PATCH 08/13] nvme-pci: remove the CQ lock for interrupt driven queues Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-04 1:08 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-12-02 16:46 ` [PATCH 09/13] nvme-rdma: remove I/O polling support Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-02 16:46 ` [PATCH 10/13] nvme-mpath: " Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-03 18:22 ` Keith Busch
2018-12-04 1:11 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-12-04 15:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-04 17:18 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-12-02 16:46 ` [PATCH 11/13] block: remove ->poll_fn Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-04 1:11 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-12-02 16:46 ` [PATCH 12/13] block: only allow polling if a poll queue_map exists Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-04 1:14 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-12-02 16:46 ` [PATCH 13/13] block: enable polling by default if a poll map is initalized Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-04 1:14 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-12-04 18:40 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=11a7106d-17e2-ceb4-bc16-22b447d0bc0f@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox