Linux-NVME Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: james_p_freyensee@linux.intel.com (J Freyensee)
Subject: [PATCH RFC] nvme-cli: propose 'c' vs 'r' for connect flag
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 09:43:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1474649004.15303.44.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160923150026.GB19352@keith>

On Fri, 2016-09-23@11:00 -0400, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016@08:33:01PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016@03:37:20PM -0700, Jay Freyensee wrote:
> > > 
> > > I am not sure if it matters too much except in possibly
> > > human usage understanding, but '-r' is used in the 'discover'
> > > command for --raw.??Change the --reconnect-delay flag
> > > single letter to something not being used in any fabrics
> > > command.
> > 
> > Sounds ok to me.??But I have to say dealing with these short
> > options
> > start to be a little annoying.??For a lot of these commands I'd
> > prefer
> > to simply support long options only if we could (I'll need to look
> > at argconfig.c in a bit more detail how easily that could be done).
> 
> Aw, I like having short opts. Yeah, some were arbitrarily picked to
> avoid
> clashes (though I clearly missed some clashes), and difficult to
> remember,
> but every sub-command shows consistent helpful usage info with a "
> --help".

OK, I'll respin this, add the review tags, and remove the RFC and send
it back out.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-23 16:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-22 22:37 [PATCH RFC] nvme-cli: propose 'c' vs 'r' for connect flag Jay Freyensee
2016-09-23  3:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-09-23 14:49   ` Steve Wise
2016-09-23 15:00   ` Keith Busch
2016-09-23 16:43     ` J Freyensee [this message]
2016-09-23 20:59       ` Sagi Grimberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1474649004.15303.44.camel@linux.intel.com \
    --to=james_p_freyensee@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox