public inbox for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	marcan@marcan.st, sven@svenpeter.dev, kbusch@kernel.org,
	axboe@kernel.dk, james.smart@broadcom.com
Cc: alyssa@rosenzweig.io, asahi@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, kch@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: don't set a virt_boundary unless needed
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 11:30:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <155ec506-ede8-42c7-95f7-e8be32800a8d@grimberg.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231221084853.1175482-1-hch@lst.de>


> NVMe PRPs are a pain and force the expensive virt_boundary checking on
> block layer, prevent secure passthrough and require scatter/gather I/O
> to be split into multiple commands which is problematic for the upcoming
> atomic write support.

But is the threshold still correct? meaning for I/Os small enough the
device will have lower performance? I'm not advocating that we keep it,
but we should at least mention the tradeoff in the change log.

> Fix the NVMe core to require an opt-in from the drivers for it.
> 
> For nvme-apple it is always required as the driver only supports PRPs.
> 
> For nvme-pci when SGLs are supported we'll always use them for data I/O
> that would require a virt_boundary.
> 
> For nvme-rdma the virt boundary is always required, as RMDA MRs are just
> as dumb as NVMe PRPs.

That is actually device dependent. The driver can ask for a pool of
mrs with type IB_MR_TYPE_SG_GAPS if the device supports IBK_SG_GAPS_REG.

See from ib_srp.c:
--
        if (device->attrs.kernel_cap_flags & IBK_SG_GAPS_REG)
                 mr_type = IB_MR_TYPE_SG_GAPS;
         else
                 mr_type = IB_MR_TYPE_MEM_REG;
--

> 
> For nvme-tcp and nvme-fc I set the flags for now because I don't
> understand the drivers fully, but I suspect the flags could be lifted.

tcp can absolutely omit virt boundaries.

> For nvme-loop the flag is never set as it doesn't have any requirements
> on the I/O format.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>   drivers/nvme/host/apple.c |  6 +++++
>   drivers/nvme/host/core.c  | 11 ++++++++-
>   drivers/nvme/host/fc.c    |  3 +++
>   drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h  |  4 +++
>   drivers/nvme/host/pci.c   | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>   drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c  |  6 +++++
>   drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c   |  3 +++
>   7 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/apple.c b/drivers/nvme/host/apple.c
> index 596bb11eeba5a9..a1afb54e3b4da8 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/apple.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/apple.c
> @@ -1116,6 +1116,12 @@ static void apple_nvme_reset_work(struct work_struct *work)
>   		goto out;
>   	}
>   
> +	/*
> +	 * nvme-apple always uses PRPs and thus needs to set a virt boundary.
> +	 */
> +	set_bit(NVME_CTRL_VIRT_BOUNDARY_IO, &anv->ctrl.flags);
> +	set_bit(NVME_CTRL_VIRT_BOUNDARY_ADMIN, &anv->ctrl.flags);
> +

Why two flags? Why can't the core just always set the blk virt boundary
on the admin request queue?

>   	ret = nvme_init_ctrl_finish(&anv->ctrl, false);
>   	if (ret)
>   		goto out


  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-21  9:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-21  8:48 [PATCH] nvme: don't set a virt_boundary unless needed Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-21  9:30 ` Sagi Grimberg [this message]
2023-12-21 12:17   ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-21 12:32     ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-12-21 12:40       ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-25  9:13         ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-12-21 17:03     ` Keith Busch
2023-12-25  9:20       ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-12-22  1:16   ` Max Gurtovoy
2023-12-25 10:08     ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-12-25 10:36       ` Max Gurtovoy
2023-12-25 10:44         ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-12-25 12:31           ` Max Gurtovoy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=155ec506-ede8-42c7-95f7-e8be32800a8d@grimberg.me \
    --to=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=alyssa@rosenzweig.io \
    --cc=asahi@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=kch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=marcan@marcan.st \
    --cc=sven@svenpeter.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox