From: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
marcan@marcan.st, sven@svenpeter.dev, kbusch@kernel.org,
axboe@kernel.dk, james.smart@broadcom.com
Cc: alyssa@rosenzweig.io, asahi@lists.linux.dev,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, kch@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: don't set a virt_boundary unless needed
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 11:30:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <155ec506-ede8-42c7-95f7-e8be32800a8d@grimberg.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231221084853.1175482-1-hch@lst.de>
> NVMe PRPs are a pain and force the expensive virt_boundary checking on
> block layer, prevent secure passthrough and require scatter/gather I/O
> to be split into multiple commands which is problematic for the upcoming
> atomic write support.
But is the threshold still correct? meaning for I/Os small enough the
device will have lower performance? I'm not advocating that we keep it,
but we should at least mention the tradeoff in the change log.
> Fix the NVMe core to require an opt-in from the drivers for it.
>
> For nvme-apple it is always required as the driver only supports PRPs.
>
> For nvme-pci when SGLs are supported we'll always use them for data I/O
> that would require a virt_boundary.
>
> For nvme-rdma the virt boundary is always required, as RMDA MRs are just
> as dumb as NVMe PRPs.
That is actually device dependent. The driver can ask for a pool of
mrs with type IB_MR_TYPE_SG_GAPS if the device supports IBK_SG_GAPS_REG.
See from ib_srp.c:
--
if (device->attrs.kernel_cap_flags & IBK_SG_GAPS_REG)
mr_type = IB_MR_TYPE_SG_GAPS;
else
mr_type = IB_MR_TYPE_MEM_REG;
--
>
> For nvme-tcp and nvme-fc I set the flags for now because I don't
> understand the drivers fully, but I suspect the flags could be lifted.
tcp can absolutely omit virt boundaries.
> For nvme-loop the flag is never set as it doesn't have any requirements
> on the I/O format.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
> drivers/nvme/host/apple.c | 6 +++++
> drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 11 ++++++++-
> drivers/nvme/host/fc.c | 3 +++
> drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h | 4 +++
> drivers/nvme/host/pci.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c | 6 +++++
> drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c | 3 +++
> 7 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/apple.c b/drivers/nvme/host/apple.c
> index 596bb11eeba5a9..a1afb54e3b4da8 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/apple.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/apple.c
> @@ -1116,6 +1116,12 @@ static void apple_nvme_reset_work(struct work_struct *work)
> goto out;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * nvme-apple always uses PRPs and thus needs to set a virt boundary.
> + */
> + set_bit(NVME_CTRL_VIRT_BOUNDARY_IO, &anv->ctrl.flags);
> + set_bit(NVME_CTRL_VIRT_BOUNDARY_ADMIN, &anv->ctrl.flags);
> +
Why two flags? Why can't the core just always set the blk virt boundary
on the admin request queue?
> ret = nvme_init_ctrl_finish(&anv->ctrl, false);
> if (ret)
> goto out
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-21 9:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-21 8:48 [PATCH] nvme: don't set a virt_boundary unless needed Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-21 9:30 ` Sagi Grimberg [this message]
2023-12-21 12:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-21 12:32 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-12-21 12:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-25 9:13 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-12-21 17:03 ` Keith Busch
2023-12-25 9:20 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-12-22 1:16 ` Max Gurtovoy
2023-12-25 10:08 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-12-25 10:36 ` Max Gurtovoy
2023-12-25 10:44 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-12-25 12:31 ` Max Gurtovoy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=155ec506-ede8-42c7-95f7-e8be32800a8d@grimberg.me \
--to=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=alyssa@rosenzweig.io \
--cc=asahi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marcan@marcan.st \
--cc=sven@svenpeter.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox