Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] nvme: document the service-time iopolicy sysfs attributes

[Martin George <martinus.gpy@gmail.com>]

On Mon, 2026-10-19 at 08:43 -0400, Laurence Oberman wrote:
> On Mon, 2026-10-19 at 17:43 +0530, Martin George wrote:
> > On Mon, 2026-10-19 at 19:13 +0800, Guixin Liu wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Should "service-time" also be added to the accepted values for
> > > > /sys/class/nvme-subsystem/nvme-subsysX/iopolicy?
> > > > 
> > > > هایی
> > > Sure, changed in v3.
> > 
> > Not just /sys/class/nvme-subsystem/nvme-subsysX/iopolicy, but this
> > should be added to the accepted values in /sys/class/nvme-
> > subsystem/nvme-subsysX/iopolicies as well.
> > 
> > -Martin
> Hello
> 
> There should be no changes needed for my original iopolicies patch 
> 
> iopolicies_show() walks ARRAY_SIZE(nvme_iopolicy_names), so whoever
> adds a service-time policy adds its enum value and its string to
> nvme_iopolicy_names[] as part of that work. The new name then shows
> up
> in iopolicies automatically. The existing iopolicy store path already
> matches against the same array, so both attributes stay in sync
> without
> code changes
> 

I meant adding to the iopolicies documentation here.

-Martin