Linux-NVME Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: axboe@kernel.dk (Jens Axboe)
Subject: [GIT PULL] nvme fixes for Linux 4.15
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 22:04:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1dcadbce-8a97-9578-686a-c43bd8dc06fc@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <514cf7e6-f651-112e-c8bb-e5ad837d4394@kernel.dk>

On 11/23/2017 09:54 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 11/23/2017 07:44 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> Sagi Grimberg (3):
>>       nvme-fc: check if queue is ready in queue_rq
>>       nvme-loop: check if queue is ready in queue_rq
> 
> The nvme-loop part looks fine, but why is the nvme-fc part using:
> 
> enum nvme_fc_queue_flags {                                                     
>         NVME_FC_Q_CONNECTED = (1 << 0),                                         
> +       NVME_FC_Q_LIVE = (1 << 1),                                              
> }; 
> 
> for flags that are used with set_bit() and friends? That's just
> misleading, should be 0, 1, etc, not a shift.
> 
> The rest looks pretty straight forward, but the above is an eye sore.

diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/fc.c b/drivers/nvme/host/fc.c
index e0577bf33f45..0a8af4daef89 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/fc.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/fc.c
@@ -31,8 +31,8 @@
 
 
 enum nvme_fc_queue_flags {
-	NVME_FC_Q_CONNECTED = (1 << 0),
-	NVME_FC_Q_LIVE = (1 << 1),
+	NVME_FC_Q_CONNECTED = 0,
+	NVME_FC_Q_LIVE,
 };
 
 #define NVMEFC_QUEUE_DELAY	3		/* ms units */

-- 
Jens Axboe

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-24  5:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-23 14:44 [GIT PULL] nvme fixes for Linux 4.15 Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-24  4:54 ` Jens Axboe
2017-11-24  5:04   ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2017-11-24  8:32     ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-24 17:15       ` Jens Axboe
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-11-29 16:16 Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-29 16:30 ` Jens Axboe
2018-01-05 17:15 Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-05 17:41 ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1dcadbce-8a97-9578-686a-c43bd8dc06fc@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox