From: hch@infradead.org (Christoph Hellwig)
Subject: [PATCH] NVMe: Split shutdown work
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 07:31:07 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151124153107.GA4326@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151124151406.GA3936@localhost.localdomain>
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015@03:14:06PM +0000, Keith Busch wrote:
> Security locked drives may reject "set feature". Some of my drives in
> manufacturing mode also fail it.
Is there any wording in the spec that allows this? What number of
I/O queues will show up on these drives? Allowing to ignore this
failure is defintively black magic and needs long comments explaining
the why and how, or it will get broken accidentally again and again.
> I think the driver is doing the right thing after every CC.EN transition
> and before IO queue creation. The spec wording sounds odd, but it wouldn't
> make sense if you're not allowed to change for a reset or resume. That's
> pretty much the same scenario when the driver initially probes it:
> we don't know what state UEFI left it.
Hmm, true. Might be a good idea to clarify the spec.
> I'll send a new revision that makes nvme_dev_shutdown reentrant so we
> don't need the awkward "queue_work + flush_work".
We need serialization not just of shutdown calls, but also of shutdown
vs reset. Thinking about it aren't we doing the shutdown from the
pci_driver ->removal callback with my current branch?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-24 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-23 18:17 [PATCH] NVMe: Split shutdown work Keith Busch
2015-11-24 7:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-11-24 15:14 ` Keith Busch
2015-11-24 15:31 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2015-11-24 16:13 ` Keith Busch
2015-11-24 17:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-11-23 19:59 Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151124153107.GA4326@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox