From: willy@linux.intel.com (Matthew Wilcox)
Subject: [PATCH] NVMe: Create discard zero quirk white list
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2016 17:39:49 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160305223949.GD5530@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160304180443.GA3972@infradead.org>
On Fri, Mar 04, 2016@10:04:43AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2016@10:45:22AM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
> > The NVMe specification does not require discarded blocks return zeroes on
> > read, but provides that behavior as a possibility. Some applications more
> > efficiently use an SSD if reads on discarded blocks were deterministically
> > zero, based on the "discard_zeroes_data" queue attribute.
>
> Meh, indeed:
>
> "If a read occurs to a deallocated range, the controller shall return
> all zeros, all ones, or the last data written to the associated LBA."
>
> time to write a TP for a bit on the identify page..
Since we have a WRITE ZEROES command, do we need this?
> > There is no specification defined way to determine device behavior on
> > discarded blocks, so the driver always left the queue setting disabled. We
> > can only know behavior based on individual device models, so this patch
> > adds a flag to the NVMe "quirk" list that vendors may set if they know
> > their controller works that way. The patch also sets the new flag for one
> > such known device.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Artur Paszkiewicz <artur.paszkiewicz at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <keith.busch at intel.com>
>
> Not happy about this, but I guess we'll need something like this in the
> long run..
>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-nvme mailing list
> Linux-nvme at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-05 22:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-04 17:45 [PATCH] NVMe: Create discard zero quirk white list Keith Busch
2016-03-04 18:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-03-04 18:13 ` Keith Busch
2016-03-05 22:39 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2016-03-06 6:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160305223949.GD5530@linux.intel.com \
--to=willy@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox