From: keith.busch@intel.com (Keith Busch)
Subject: [PATCH] NVMe: Fix possible scheduling while atomic error
Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 10:55:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160523145556.GB17208@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160523143631.GA28107@infradead.org>
On Mon, May 23, 2016@07:36:31AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2016@09:41:16AM -0400, Keith Busch wrote:
> > On Mon, May 23, 2016@03:58:07AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 17, 2016@03:37:42PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > > > rcu_read_lock();
> > > > list_for_each_entry_rcu(ns, &ctrl->namespaces, list) {
> > > > - queue_flag_clear_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_STOPPED, ns->queue);
> > > > + spin_lock_irq(ns->queue->queue_lock);
> > > > + queue_flag_clear(QUEUE_FLAG_STOPPED, ns->queue);
> > > > + spin_unlock_irq(ns->queue->queue_lock);
> > >
> > > What's the rationale for this change?
> >
> > That was to make it so nvme_queue_rq wouldn't see a stopped flag just
> > before it was starting.
>
> I don't really see how that helps us with any race..
Without the additional spin lock protecting QUEUE_FLAG_STOPPED:
CPU A CPU B
----- -----
nvme_start_queues nvme_queue_rq
if (nvmeq->cq_vector < 0) <-- queue is disabled during reset, returning BLK_MQ_RQ_QUEUE_BUSY
goto out;
if (blk_queue_stopped()) <-- returns true
queue_flag_clear
blk_mq_start_stopped_hw_queues
blk_mq_stop_hw_queues() <-- incorrectly stops h/w queues
Locking the queue in nvme_start_queues before clearing the flag fixes
that up.
> > It's moved out of that function holding the rcu read lock since
> > blk_mq_stop_hw_queues potentially sleeps.
>
> blk_mq_stop_hw_queues is a loop around blk_mq_stop_hw_queue,
> which itself does two calls to cancel_delayed_work and a set_bit.
> None of them can block.
Oops, I'm crossing wires and mixing up what API's do what ... need to
wake up before starting work.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-23 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-17 21:37 [PATCH] NVMe: Fix possible scheduling while atomic error Keith Busch
2016-05-23 10:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-23 13:41 ` Keith Busch
2016-05-23 14:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-23 14:55 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2016-05-24 18:43 ` Ming Lin
2016-05-24 19:59 ` Keith Busch
2016-05-25 8:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-25 17:57 ` Keith Busch
2016-05-27 7:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-08 11:17 ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-06-08 14:43 ` Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160523145556.GB17208@localhost.localdomain \
--to=keith.busch@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox