* [PATCH] nvme_fc: correct LS validation
@ 2016-12-24 17:46 James Smart
2017-01-09 15:01 ` Johannes Thumshirn
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: James Smart @ 2016-12-24 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
LS validations shouldn't have been independent checks.
Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart at broadcom.com>
---
drivers/nvme/host/fc.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/fc.c b/drivers/nvme/host/fc.c
index 03bb599..d30ef8c 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/fc.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/fc.c
@@ -848,11 +848,12 @@ nvme_fc_connect_admin_queue(struct nvme_fc_ctrl *ctrl,
/* validate the ACC response */
if (assoc_acc->hdr.w0.ls_cmd != FCNVME_LS_ACC)
fcret = VERR_LSACC;
- if (assoc_acc->hdr.desc_list_len !=
+ else if (assoc_acc->hdr.desc_list_len !=
fcnvme_lsdesc_len(
sizeof(struct fcnvme_ls_cr_assoc_acc)))
fcret = VERR_CR_ASSOC_ACC_LEN;
- if (assoc_acc->hdr.rqst.desc_tag != cpu_to_be32(FCNVME_LSDESC_RQST))
+ else if (assoc_acc->hdr.rqst.desc_tag !=
+ cpu_to_be32(FCNVME_LSDESC_RQST))
fcret = VERR_LSDESC_RQST;
else if (assoc_acc->hdr.rqst.desc_len !=
fcnvme_lsdesc_len(sizeof(struct fcnvme_lsdesc_rqst)))
@@ -955,10 +956,10 @@ nvme_fc_connect_queue(struct nvme_fc_ctrl *ctrl, struct nvme_fc_queue *queue,
/* validate the ACC response */
if (conn_acc->hdr.w0.ls_cmd != FCNVME_LS_ACC)
fcret = VERR_LSACC;
- if (conn_acc->hdr.desc_list_len !=
+ else if (conn_acc->hdr.desc_list_len !=
fcnvme_lsdesc_len(sizeof(struct fcnvme_ls_cr_conn_acc)))
fcret = VERR_CR_CONN_ACC_LEN;
- if (conn_acc->hdr.rqst.desc_tag != cpu_to_be32(FCNVME_LSDESC_RQST))
+ else if (conn_acc->hdr.rqst.desc_tag != cpu_to_be32(FCNVME_LSDESC_RQST))
fcret = VERR_LSDESC_RQST;
else if (conn_acc->hdr.rqst.desc_len !=
fcnvme_lsdesc_len(sizeof(struct fcnvme_lsdesc_rqst)))
--
2.5.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] nvme_fc: correct LS validation
2016-12-24 17:46 [PATCH] nvme_fc: correct LS validation James Smart
@ 2017-01-09 15:01 ` Johannes Thumshirn
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Thumshirn @ 2017-01-09 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
On Sat, Dec 24, 2016@09:46:41AM -0800, James Smart wrote:
>
> LS validations shouldn't have been independent checks.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart at broadcom.com>
> ---
Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn at suse.de>
--
Johannes Thumshirn Storage
jthumshirn at suse.de +49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg
GF: Felix Imend?rffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG N?rnberg)
Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-01-09 15:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-12-24 17:46 [PATCH] nvme_fc: correct LS validation James Smart
2017-01-09 15:01 ` Johannes Thumshirn
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox