From: keith.busch@intel.com (Keith Busch)
Subject: Bug Report: can't unload nvme module in case of disabled device
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 15:17:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170810191717.GA1604@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170810164536.GC14634@localhost.localdomain>
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017@12:45:36PM -0400, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2017@03:58:10PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I would like to report a bug that reproduced by the following steps (I'm
> > using 4.13.0-rc3+):
> >
> > 1. modprobe nvme
> > 2. echo 0 > /sys/block/nvme0n1/device/device/enable
> > 3. nvme list (stuck for more than 1-2 mins)
> > 4. modprobe -r nvme (stuck forever)
> >
> > log:
> >
> > [ 1342.388888] nvme nvme0: controller is down; will reset: CSTS=0x3,
> > PCI_STATUS=0x10
> > [ 1476.021392] INFO: task kworker/u98:1:436 blocked for more than 120
> > seconds.
> > [ 1476.029072] Not tainted 4.13.0-rc3+ #19
> > [ 1476.033878] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables
> > this message.
> > [ 1476.042505] kworker/u98:1 D 0 436 2 0x00000000
> > [ 1476.048569] Workqueue: nvme-wq nvme_reset_work [nvme]
> > [ 1476.054133] Call Trace:
> > [ 1476.056862] __schedule+0x1dc/0x780
> > [ 1476.060706] schedule+0x36/0x80
> > [ 1476.064180] blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait+0x4b/0xb0
> > [ 1476.069175] ? remove_wait_queue+0x60/0x60
> > [ 1476.073693] nvme_wait_freeze+0x33/0x50 [nvme_core]
> > [ 1476.079068] nvme_reset_work+0x6b9/0xc40 [nvme]
> > [ 1476.084075] ? __switch_to+0x23e/0x4a0
> > [ 1476.088209] process_one_work+0x149/0x360
> > [ 1476.092625] worker_thread+0x4d/0x3c0
> > [ 1476.096692] kthread+0x109/0x140
> > [ 1476.100247] ? rescuer_thread+0x380/0x380
> > [ 1476.104664] ? kthread_park+0x60/0x60
> > [ 1476.108698] ret_from_fork+0x25/0x30
>
> This looks like a path does not pair the freeze start with the reset's
> freeze wait. I'll have to see what the pci 'enable' sysfs entry does.
I see how the freeze start/stops are not paired in this scenario:
nvme_dev_disable doesn't start the freeze if the pci device isn't
disabled. It uses this to know if it is disabling the device twice.
In this test, though, you are disabling the pci device without the
driver's knowledge, so that breaks that logic. In light of that, we'll
need different criteria to know when the driver should start a freeze.
I'll test some things out and send a patch.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-10 19:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-01 12:58 Bug Report: can't unload nvme module in case of disabled device Max Gurtovoy
2017-08-10 8:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-10 17:04 ` Max Gurtovoy
2017-08-10 19:36 ` Keith Busch
2017-08-13 8:29 ` Max Gurtovoy
2017-08-14 20:24 ` Keith Busch
2017-08-10 16:45 ` Keith Busch
2017-08-10 19:17 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2017-08-10 19:34 ` Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170810191717.GA1604@localhost.localdomain \
--to=keith.busch@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox