Linux-NVME Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: keith.busch@intel.com (Keith Busch)
Subject: [PATCH] nvme: allow timed-out ios to retry
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 16:37:59 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170907203759.GA2832@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170907201804.24979-1-jsmart2021@gmail.com>

On Thu, Sep 07, 2017@01:18:04PM -0700, James Smart wrote:
> Currently the nvme_req_needs_retry() applies several checks to see if
> a retry is allowed. On of those is whether the current time has exceeded
> the start time of the io plus the timeout length. This check, if an io
> times out, means there is never a retry allowed for the io. Which means
> applications see the io failure.
> 
> Remove this check and allow the io to timeout, like it does on other
> protocols, and retries to be made.
> 
> On the FC transport, a frame can be lost for an individual io, and there
> may be no other errors that escalate for the connection/association.
> The io will timeout, which causes the transport to escalate into creating
> a new association, but the io that timed out, due to this retry logic, has
> already failed back to the application and things are hosed.

I'm a bit conflicted on this. While it'd be nice to give commands a chance
to succeed after a timeout handling's controller reset, some uses would
rather a command fail fast than succeed slow, and this change could keep
a request outstanding for a very long time.

What if we have a second timeout value: one for in-flight timeout before
abort/controller resset, and another for total request lifetime?

> Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart at broadcom.com>
> ---
>  drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> index acc816b67582..90d09067a82a 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> @@ -134,8 +134,6 @@ static inline bool nvme_req_needs_retry(struct request *req)
>  		return false;
>  	if (nvme_req(req)->status & NVME_SC_DNR)
>  		return false;
> -	if (jiffies - req->start_time >= req->timeout)
> -		return false;
>  	if (nvme_req(req)->retries >= nvme_max_retries)
>  		return false;
>  	return true;
> -- 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-07 20:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-07 20:18 [PATCH] nvme: allow timed-out ios to retry James Smart
2017-09-07 20:37 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2017-09-08 16:11   ` James Smart
2017-09-18 17:15     ` James Smart
2017-09-18 17:24       ` Keith Busch
2017-09-18 17:42         ` James Smart
2017-09-18 17:49           ` Keith Busch
2017-09-18  0:27   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-20 11:27     ` Sagi Grimberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170907203759.GA2832@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=keith.busch@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox