From: keith.busch@intel.com (Keith Busch)
Subject: [PATCH] fix failure when root filesystem is on nvme
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 17:14:15 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180424231415.GA31318@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1804241743050.19786@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com>
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018@06:18:54PM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 21 Apr 2018, Keith Busch wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 21, 2018@09:59:48AM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> >
> > > There's a bug in the nvme block device driver that causes failure when we
> > > have no initramfs and the root filesystem is directly on nvme. The driver
> > > spawns a work item nvme_reset_work() in the nvme_wq workqueue, but doesn't
> > > wait for it. The result is that the kernel attempts to mount the root
> > > filesystem before nvme_reset_work() finishes and it panics because it
> > > can't find the root device.
> > >
> > > It can be fixed with this simple patch (perhaps you can come up with a
> > > better patch that uses the asynchronous probing infrastructure?)
> >
> > We probe asynchronously to fix other issues.
> >
> > First is that boot takes way
> > too long if you have a lot of devices when probing all of them serially,
> > and then certain init systems kill the probe task after a certain time,
> > breaking boot for those.
> >
> > Is there something we can do for your setup to have the kernel wait for
> > the root partition to be available instead of givinig up after pci probe?
>
> Are different PCI NVME devices probed concurrently by the PCI API? (I
> can't try, I have just one)
It does not.
> If yes, then the patch that I posted should be
> OK, because it wouldn't break this concurrency.
But you're waiting for the wrong work queue: the driver's reset_work
won't get your root filesystem. That is handled in the scan_work.
> If not, then you need to make sure that wait_for_device_probe() waits for
> the NVME probe to finish. The kernel calls wait_for_device_probe() just
> before it attempts to mount the root filesystem. I don't know which of the
> kernel frameworks would be best suited to accomplish that. Perhaps the
> simplest solution would be to increment probe_count in nvme_probe and
> decrement it when the probe work item finishes - but it is not exported
> and you'd need to create helper functions in drivers/base/dd.c to do that.
Will have to look into it, but I think an async_domain is going to be the
right way to go and shouldn't require any changes outside nvme.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-24 23:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-21 13:59 [PATCH] fix failure when root filesystem is on nvme Mikulas Patocka
2018-04-21 19:16 ` Keith Busch
2018-04-24 22:18 ` Mikulas Patocka
2018-04-24 23:14 ` Keith Busch [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180424231415.GA31318@localhost.localdomain \
--to=keith.busch@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox