Linux-NVME Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: hare@suse.de (Hannes Reinecke)
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] nvme: start ANATT timer on out-of-order state changes
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2018 16:01:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180607160152.15809a29@pentland.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180607134612.GA15587@lst.de>

On Thu, 7 Jun 2018 15:46:12 +0200
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 07, 2018@03:20:36PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
[ .. ]
> 
> > Especially due to this paragraph:  
> > > If no controllers are reporting ANA Optimized state or ANA
> > > Non-Optimized state, then a transition may be occurring such that
> > > a controller reporting the Inaccessible state may become
> > > accessible and the host should retry the command on the
> > > controller reporting Inaccessible state for at least ANATT
> > > seconds (refer to Figure 109).  
> > 
> > which seems to imply to me that we can have an implicit transition
> > on the target while reporting the inaccessible state error, and the
> > use of ANATT here is indeed applicable.  
> 
> But we'll still get the AEN.  The whole point is the above is that
> if we had a queue_if_no_path=0 mode we should not give up before
> ANATT.
> 
There is no guarantee that we will get the AEN.
Yes, the spec says we should, but it's just a single message which
might easily be lost if the corresponding frame is dropped.
Think of FC, which supposedly is a lossless fabric, yet a sizeable
piece of the spec deals with recovery from lost frames.
It _will_ happen.

To rephrase my problem statement:

What is the appropriate action if our copy of the ANA log page
indicates an optimized or non-optimized ANA state, but we're getting an
I/O error back indicating an inaccessible or persistent-loss ANA state?
If this is a simple active/passive scenario we will have set all paths
to inactive, leaving us with no paths to sent I/O to.

We _could_ try to implement the last-resort handling of sending I/Os to
the inaccessible paths (as per ANA base spec), but as we're not having
a round-robin selector we're ending up always hitting the first
inaccessible path. If that's the 'true' inaccessible one we will never
be able to send I/O even though the target is fully operable.

With this patch we detect this situation, and reset the controller
forcing us to re-read the ANA log page. After which we can do normal
I/O again.

If you have a better solution I'm all ears.

Cheers,

Hannes

  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-07 14:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-07  7:35 [PATCH 0/4] nvme: ANATT handling Hannes Reinecke
2018-06-07  7:35 ` [PATCH 1/4] nvmet: make ANATT configurable Hannes Reinecke
2018-06-07 12:06   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-07 12:42     ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-06-07 13:03   ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-06-07  7:35 ` [PATCH 2/4] nvmet: ANA transition timeout handling Hannes Reinecke
2018-06-07 12:07   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-07 13:31     ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-06-07 13:41       ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-07 13:12   ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-06-07  7:35 ` [PATCH 3/4] nvme: " Hannes Reinecke
2018-06-07 12:09   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-07 12:52     ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-06-07 13:11       ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-07 13:16   ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-06-07 13:26     ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-07  7:35 ` [PATCH 4/4] nvme: start ANATT timer on out-of-order state changes Hannes Reinecke
2018-06-07 12:11   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-07 12:37     ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-06-07 13:10       ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-07 13:20         ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-06-07 13:46           ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-07 14:01             ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2018-06-07 14:22               ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-07 15:20                 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-06-07 13:20   ` Sagi Grimberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180607160152.15809a29@pentland.suse.de \
    --to=hare@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox