From: keith.busch@intel.com (Keith Busch)
Subject: [PATCH 04/16] nvme-core: Complain if nvme_init_identify() fails
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 16:16:51 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181008221650.GA5979@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181008212854.68310-5-bvanassche@acm.org>
On Mon, Oct 08, 2018@02:28:42PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> This patch avoids that Coverity complains that some but not all callers of
> nvme_init_identify() check the return value of that function. See also
> Coverity ID 1423964.
That seems like an odd thing to complain about. If we required the
return value be checked, we have the "__must_check" attribute. In this
particular path, we don't care if nvme_init_identify returns an error,
and the failure is logged in kernel messages within the function already.
Is there another way to suppress the complaint?
> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche at acm.org>
> ---
> drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> index 3746fe49c382..2ce3e9d15618 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> @@ -1213,7 +1213,7 @@ static void nvme_passthru_end(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, u32 effects)
> if (effects & (NVME_CMD_EFFECTS_LBCC | NVME_CMD_EFFECTS_CSE_MASK))
> nvme_unfreeze(ctrl);
> if (effects & NVME_CMD_EFFECTS_CCC)
> - nvme_init_identify(ctrl);
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(nvme_init_identify(ctrl) < 0);
> if (effects & (NVME_CMD_EFFECTS_NIC | NVME_CMD_EFFECTS_NCC))
> nvme_queue_scan(ctrl);
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-08 22:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-08 21:28 [PATCH 00/16] Fixes for issues detected by static analyzers Bart Van Assche
2018-10-08 21:28 ` [PATCH 01/16] nvme-core: Declare local symbols static Bart Van Assche
2018-10-08 21:51 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2018-10-09 11:26 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-10-08 21:28 ` [PATCH 02/16] nvme-core: Refuse out-of-range integrity data seeds Bart Van Assche
2018-10-08 21:46 ` Keith Busch
2018-10-08 21:28 ` [PATCH 03/16] nvme-core: Rework a NQN copying operation Bart Van Assche
2018-10-09 11:27 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-10-08 21:28 ` [PATCH 04/16] nvme-core: Complain if nvme_init_identify() fails Bart Van Assche
2018-10-08 21:45 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2018-10-08 22:16 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2018-10-08 22:26 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-10-08 22:54 ` Keith Busch
2018-10-08 21:28 ` [PATCH 05/16] nvme-pci: Fix nvme_suspend_queue() kernel-doc header Bart Van Assche
2018-10-08 21:58 ` Keith Busch
2018-10-08 21:28 ` [PATCH 06/16] nvme-fc: Fix kernel-doc headers Bart Van Assche
2018-10-09 18:30 ` James Smart
2018-10-08 21:28 ` [PATCH 07/16] nvme-fc: Introduce struct nvme_fcp_op_w_sgl Bart Van Assche
2018-10-09 18:38 ` James Smart
2018-10-08 21:28 ` [PATCH 08/16] nvme-fc: Rework the request initialization code Bart Van Assche
2018-10-09 18:41 ` James Smart
2018-10-08 21:28 ` [PATCH 09/16] nvmet-fc: Fix kernel-doc headers Bart Van Assche
2018-10-09 18:43 ` James Smart
2018-10-08 21:28 ` [PATCH 10/16] nvmet-fcloop: Suppress a compiler warning Bart Van Assche
2018-10-09 18:44 ` James Smart
2018-10-10 13:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-08 21:28 ` [PATCH 11/16] nvmet: Use strcmp() instead of strncmp() for subsystem lookup Bart Van Assche
2018-10-08 21:28 ` [PATCH 12/16] nvmet: Remove unreachable code from nvmet_parse_discovery_cmd() Bart Van Assche
2018-10-08 22:02 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2018-10-09 1:49 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-10-08 21:28 ` [PATCH 13/16] nvmet: Use strlcpy() instead of strcpy() Bart Van Assche
2018-10-08 22:06 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2018-10-08 21:28 ` [PATCH 14/16] nvmet: Avoid integer overflow in the discard code Bart Van Assche
2018-10-08 21:57 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2018-10-08 21:28 ` [PATCH 15/16] nvmet-rdma: Declare local symbols static Bart Van Assche
2018-10-08 21:43 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2018-10-08 21:28 ` [PATCH 16/16] nvmet-rdma: Check for timeout in nvme_rdma_wait_for_cm() Bart Van Assche
2018-10-09 16:58 ` [PATCH 00/16] Fixes for issues detected by static analyzers Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-10 13:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181008221650.GA5979@localhost.localdomain \
--to=keith.busch@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox