Linux-NVME Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: keith.busch@intel.com (Keith Busch)
Subject: [PATCH 04/16] nvme-core: Complain if nvme_init_identify() fails
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 16:54:50 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181008225450.GA6023@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1539037602.64374.42.camel@acm.org>

On Mon, Oct 08, 2018@03:26:42PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-10-08@16:16 -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 08, 2018@02:28:42PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > > This patch avoids that Coverity complains that some but not all callers of
> > > nvme_init_identify() check the return value of that function. See also
> > > Coverity ID 1423964.
> > 
> > That seems like an odd thing to complain about. If we required the
> > return value be checked, we have the "__must_check" attribute. In this
> > particular path, we don't care if nvme_init_identify returns an error,
> > and the failure is logged in kernel messages within the function already.
> > 
> > Is there another way to suppress the complaint?
> 
> One way is to change nvme_init_identify(ctrl) into the following:
> 
> if (nvme_init_identify(ctrl) < 0) {
> }
> 
> However, I'm not sure we should do that. Another possibility is to mark the
> complaint in the Coverity database as "intended". That means that the return
> value is ignored on purpose.

Right, I was hoping for a way to suppress the complaint without changing
the code since it is intended as-is.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-08 22:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-08 21:28 [PATCH 00/16] Fixes for issues detected by static analyzers Bart Van Assche
2018-10-08 21:28 ` [PATCH 01/16] nvme-core: Declare local symbols static Bart Van Assche
2018-10-08 21:51   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2018-10-09 11:26   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-10-08 21:28 ` [PATCH 02/16] nvme-core: Refuse out-of-range integrity data seeds Bart Van Assche
2018-10-08 21:46   ` Keith Busch
2018-10-08 21:28 ` [PATCH 03/16] nvme-core: Rework a NQN copying operation Bart Van Assche
2018-10-09 11:27   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-10-08 21:28 ` [PATCH 04/16] nvme-core: Complain if nvme_init_identify() fails Bart Van Assche
2018-10-08 21:45   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2018-10-08 22:16   ` Keith Busch
2018-10-08 22:26     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-10-08 22:54       ` Keith Busch [this message]
2018-10-08 21:28 ` [PATCH 05/16] nvme-pci: Fix nvme_suspend_queue() kernel-doc header Bart Van Assche
2018-10-08 21:58   ` Keith Busch
2018-10-08 21:28 ` [PATCH 06/16] nvme-fc: Fix kernel-doc headers Bart Van Assche
2018-10-09 18:30   ` James Smart
2018-10-08 21:28 ` [PATCH 07/16] nvme-fc: Introduce struct nvme_fcp_op_w_sgl Bart Van Assche
2018-10-09 18:38   ` James Smart
2018-10-08 21:28 ` [PATCH 08/16] nvme-fc: Rework the request initialization code Bart Van Assche
2018-10-09 18:41   ` James Smart
2018-10-08 21:28 ` [PATCH 09/16] nvmet-fc: Fix kernel-doc headers Bart Van Assche
2018-10-09 18:43   ` James Smart
2018-10-08 21:28 ` [PATCH 10/16] nvmet-fcloop: Suppress a compiler warning Bart Van Assche
2018-10-09 18:44   ` James Smart
2018-10-10 13:18   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-08 21:28 ` [PATCH 11/16] nvmet: Use strcmp() instead of strncmp() for subsystem lookup Bart Van Assche
2018-10-08 21:28 ` [PATCH 12/16] nvmet: Remove unreachable code from nvmet_parse_discovery_cmd() Bart Van Assche
2018-10-08 22:02   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2018-10-09  1:49     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-10-08 21:28 ` [PATCH 13/16] nvmet: Use strlcpy() instead of strcpy() Bart Van Assche
2018-10-08 22:06   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2018-10-08 21:28 ` [PATCH 14/16] nvmet: Avoid integer overflow in the discard code Bart Van Assche
2018-10-08 21:57   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2018-10-08 21:28 ` [PATCH 15/16] nvmet-rdma: Declare local symbols static Bart Van Assche
2018-10-08 21:43   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2018-10-08 21:28 ` [PATCH 16/16] nvmet-rdma: Check for timeout in nvme_rdma_wait_for_cm() Bart Van Assche
2018-10-09 16:58 ` [PATCH 00/16] Fixes for issues detected by static analyzers Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-10 13:18 ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181008225450.GA6023@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=keith.busch@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox