From: ming.lei@redhat.com (Ming Lei)
Subject: [PATCH] blk-mq: Wait for for hctx requests on CPU unplug
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 05:27:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190406212709.GA29871@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOSXXT7V3E2j_Ut=hJ2X3QcdLwuWGRFtgzTs4iTe+RDMeHg8nA@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Apr 05, 2019@05:36:32PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2019@5:04 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
> > Looking at current peak testing, I've got around 1.2% in queue enter
> > and exit. It's definitely not free, hence my question. Probably safe
> > to assume that we'll double that cycle counter, per IO.
>
> Okay, that's not negligible at all. I don't know of a faster reference
> than the percpu_ref, but that much overhead would have to rule out
> having a per hctx counter.
Or not using any refcount in fast path, how about the following one?
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 3ff3d7b49969..6fe334e12236 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -2199,6 +2199,23 @@ int blk_mq_alloc_rqs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
return -ENOMEM;
}
+static void blk_mq_wait_hctx_become_idle(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
+ int dead_cpu)
+{
+ unsigned long msecs_left = 1000 * 10;
+
+ while (msecs_left > 0) {
+ if (blk_mq_hctx_idle(hctx))
+ break;
+ msleep(5);
+ msecs_left -= 5;
+ }
+
+ if (msecs_left > 0)
+ printk(KERN_WARNING "requests not completed from "
+ "CPU %d\n", dead_cpu);
+}
+
/*
* 'cpu' is going away. splice any existing rq_list entries from this
* software queue to the hw queue dispatch list, and ensure that it
@@ -2230,6 +2247,14 @@ static int blk_mq_hctx_notify_dead(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
spin_unlock(&hctx->lock);
blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx, true);
+
+ /*
+ * Interrupt for this queue will be shutdown, so wait until all
+ * requests from this hctx is done or timeout.
+ */
+ if (cpumask_first_and(hctx->cpumask, cpu_online_mask) >= nr_cpu_ids)
+ blk_mq_wait_hctx_become_idle(hctx, cpu);
+
return 0;
}
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.h b/block/blk-mq.h
index d704fc7766f4..935cf8519bf2 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.h
+++ b/block/blk-mq.h
@@ -240,4 +240,15 @@ static inline void blk_mq_clear_mq_map(struct blk_mq_queue_map *qmap)
qmap->mq_map[cpu] = 0;
}
+static inline bool blk_mq_hctx_idle(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
+{
+ struct blk_mq_tags *tags = hctx->sched_tags ?: hctx->tags;
+
+ if (!tags)
+ return true;
+
+ return !sbitmap_any_bit_set(&tags->bitmap_tags.sb) &&
+ !sbitmap_any_bit_set(&tags->bitmap_tags.sb);
+}
+
#endif
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-06 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-05 21:59 [PATCH] blk-mq: Wait for for hctx requests on CPU unplug Keith Busch
2019-04-05 22:23 ` Jens Axboe
2019-04-05 22:37 ` Keith Busch
2019-04-05 23:04 ` Jens Axboe
2019-04-05 23:36 ` Keith Busch
2019-04-06 9:44 ` Dongli Zhang
2019-04-06 21:27 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2019-04-07 13:55 ` Dongli Zhang
2019-04-08 9:49 ` Ming Lei
2019-04-08 15:36 ` Keith Busch
2019-04-08 15:21 ` Keith Busch
2019-04-07 7:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-08 15:23 ` Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190406212709.GA29871@ming.t460p \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox