Linux-NVME Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ming.lei@redhat.com (Ming Lei)
Subject: [PATCH V6 6/9] blk-mq: always free hctx after request queue is freed
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 11:44:07 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190417034410.31957-7-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190417034410.31957-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>

In normal queue cleanup path, hctx is released after request queue
is freed, see blk_mq_release().

However, in __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues(), hctx may be freed because
of hw queues shrinking. This way is easy to cause use-after-free,
because: one implicit rule is that it is safe to call almost all block
layer APIs if the request queue is alive; and one hctx may be retrieved
by one API, then the hctx can be freed by blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues();
finally use-after-free is triggered.

Fixes this issue by always freeing hctx after releasing request queue.
If some hctxs are removed in blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues(), introduce
a per-queue list to hold them, then try to resuse these hctxs if numa
node is matched.

Cc: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang at oracle.com>
Cc: James Smart <james.smart at broadcom.com>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche at wdc.com>
Cc: linux-scsi at vger.kernel.org,
Cc: Martin K . Petersen <martin.petersen at oracle.com>,
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>,
Cc: James E . J . Bottomley <jejb at linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Cc: jianchao wang <jianchao.w.wang at oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei at redhat.com>
---
 block/blk-mq.c         | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 include/linux/blk-mq.h |  2 ++
 include/linux/blkdev.h |  7 +++++++
 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index eeebba6ec0f7..2ca4395f794d 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -2274,6 +2274,10 @@ static void blk_mq_exit_hctx(struct request_queue *q,
 		set->ops->exit_hctx(hctx, hctx_idx);
 
 	blk_mq_remove_cpuhp(hctx);
+
+	spin_lock(&q->dead_hctx_lock);
+	list_add(&hctx->hctx_list, &q->dead_hctx_list);
+	spin_unlock(&q->dead_hctx_lock);
 }
 
 static void blk_mq_exit_hw_queues(struct request_queue *q,
@@ -2675,15 +2679,13 @@ static int blk_mq_alloc_ctxs(struct request_queue *q)
  */
 void blk_mq_release(struct request_queue *q)
 {
-	struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
-	unsigned int i;
+	struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, *next;
 
 	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&q->requeue_work);
 
-	/* hctx kobj stays in hctx */
-	queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i) {
-		if (!hctx)
-			continue;
+	/* all hctx are in .dead_hctx_list now */
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(hctx, next, &q->dead_hctx_list, hctx_list) {
+		list_del_init(&hctx->hctx_list);
 		kobject_put(&hctx->kobj);
 	}
 
@@ -2750,9 +2752,22 @@ static struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *blk_mq_alloc_and_init_hctx(
 		struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct request_queue *q,
 		int hctx_idx, int node)
 {
-	struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
+	struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = NULL, *tmp;
+
+	/* reuse dead hctx first */
+	spin_lock(&q->dead_hctx_lock);
+	list_for_each_entry(tmp, &q->dead_hctx_list, hctx_list) {
+		if (tmp->numa_node == node) {
+			hctx = tmp;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+	if (hctx)
+		list_del_init(&hctx->hctx_list);
+	spin_unlock(&q->dead_hctx_lock);
 
-	hctx = blk_mq_alloc_hctx(q, set, hctx_idx, node);
+	if (!hctx)
+		hctx = blk_mq_alloc_hctx(q, set, hctx_idx, node);
 	if (!hctx)
 		goto fail;
 
@@ -2790,10 +2805,8 @@ static void blk_mq_realloc_hw_ctxs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
 
 		hctx = blk_mq_alloc_and_init_hctx(set, q, i, node);
 		if (hctx) {
-			if (hctxs[i]) {
+			if (hctxs[i])
 				blk_mq_exit_hctx(q, set, hctxs[i], i);
-				kobject_put(&hctxs[i]->kobj);
-			}
 			hctxs[i] = hctx;
 		} else {
 			if (hctxs[i])
@@ -2824,9 +2837,7 @@ static void blk_mq_realloc_hw_ctxs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
 			if (hctx->tags)
 				blk_mq_free_map_and_requests(set, j);
 			blk_mq_exit_hctx(q, set, hctx, j);
-			kobject_put(&hctx->kobj);
 			hctxs[j] = NULL;
-
 		}
 	}
 	mutex_unlock(&q->sysfs_lock);
@@ -2869,6 +2880,9 @@ struct request_queue *blk_mq_init_allocated_queue(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
 	if (!q->queue_hw_ctx)
 		goto err_sys_init;
 
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&q->dead_hctx_list);
+	spin_lock_init(&q->dead_hctx_lock);
+
 	blk_mq_realloc_hw_ctxs(set, q);
 	if (!q->nr_hw_queues)
 		goto err_hctxs;
diff --git a/include/linux/blk-mq.h b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
index db29928de467..15d1aa53d96c 100644
--- a/include/linux/blk-mq.h
+++ b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
@@ -70,6 +70,8 @@ struct blk_mq_hw_ctx {
 	struct dentry		*sched_debugfs_dir;
 #endif
 
+	struct list_head	hctx_list;
+
 	/* Must be the last member - see also blk_mq_hw_ctx_size(). */
 	struct srcu_struct	srcu[0];
 };
diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
index 4b85dc066264..1325f941f0be 100644
--- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
+++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
@@ -535,6 +535,13 @@ struct request_queue {
 
 	struct mutex		sysfs_lock;
 
+	/*
+	 * for reusing dead hctx instance in case of updating
+	 * nr_hw_queues
+	 */
+	struct list_head	dead_hctx_list;
+	spinlock_t		dead_hctx_lock;
+
 	atomic_t		mq_freeze_depth;
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_BSG)
-- 
2.9.5

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-17  3:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-17  3:44 [PATCH V6 0/9] blk-mq: fix races related with freeing queue Ming Lei
2019-04-17  3:44 ` [PATCH V6 1/9] blk-mq: grab .q_usage_counter when queuing request from plug code path Ming Lei
2019-04-17  3:44 ` [PATCH V6 2/9] blk-mq: move cancel of requeue_work into blk_mq_release Ming Lei
2019-04-17 12:00   ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-04-17  3:44 ` [PATCH V6 3/9] blk-mq: free hw queue's resource in hctx's release handler Ming Lei
2019-04-17 12:02   ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-04-17  3:44 ` [PATCH V6 4/9] blk-mq: move all hctx alloction & initialization into __blk_mq_alloc_and_init_hctx Ming Lei
2019-04-17 12:03   ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-04-17  3:44 ` [PATCH V6 5/9] blk-mq: split blk_mq_alloc_and_init_hctx into two parts Ming Lei
2019-04-17  3:44 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2019-04-17 12:08   ` [PATCH V6 6/9] blk-mq: always free hctx after request queue is freed Hannes Reinecke
2019-04-17 12:59     ` Ming Lei
2019-04-22  3:30       ` Ming Lei
2019-04-23 11:19         ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-04-23 13:30           ` Ming Lei
2019-04-23 14:07             ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-04-24  1:12               ` Ming Lei
2019-04-24  1:45                 ` Ming Lei
2019-04-24  5:55                   ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-04-17  3:44 ` [PATCH V6 7/9] blk-mq: move cancel of hctx->run_work into blk_mq_hw_sysfs_release Ming Lei
2019-04-17  3:44 ` [PATCH V6 8/9] block: don't drain in-progress dispatch in blk_cleanup_queue() Ming Lei
2019-04-17  3:44 ` [PATCH V6 9/9] nvme: hold request queue's refcount in ns's whole lifetime Ming Lei
2019-04-17 12:10   ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-04-17 15:55   ` Keith Busch
2019-04-17 17:22 ` [PATCH V6 0/9] blk-mq: fix races related with freeing queue James Smart

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190417034410.31957-7-ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox