From: hare@suse.de (Hannes Reinecke)
Subject: [PATCH V6 6/9] blk-mq: always free hctx after request queue is freed
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:19:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9d93cb74-0683-bb42-2545-b4bb2bfbb831@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190422033057.GC21375@ming.t460p>
On 4/22/19 5:30 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019@08:59:43PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019@02:08:59PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>> On 4/17/19 5:44 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
>>>> In normal queue cleanup path, hctx is released after request queue
>>>> is freed, see blk_mq_release().
>>>>
>>>> However, in __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues(), hctx may be freed because
>>>> of hw queues shrinking. This way is easy to cause use-after-free,
>>>> because: one implicit rule is that it is safe to call almost all block
>>>> layer APIs if the request queue is alive; and one hctx may be retrieved
>>>> by one API, then the hctx can be freed by blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues();
>>>> finally use-after-free is triggered.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes this issue by always freeing hctx after releasing request queue.
>>>> If some hctxs are removed in blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues(), introduce
>>>> a per-queue list to hold them, then try to resuse these hctxs if numa
>>>> node is matched.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang at oracle.com>
>>>> Cc: James Smart <james.smart at broadcom.com>
>>>> Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche at wdc.com>
>>>> Cc: linux-scsi at vger.kernel.org,
>>>> Cc: Martin K . Petersen <martin.petersen at oracle.com>,
>>>> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>,
>>>> Cc: James E . J . Bottomley <jejb at linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
>>>> Cc: jianchao wang <jianchao.w.wang at oracle.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei at redhat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> block/blk-mq.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>>>> include/linux/blk-mq.h | 2 ++
>>>> include/linux/blkdev.h | 7 +++++++
>>>> 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
>>>> index eeebba6ec0f7..2ca4395f794d 100644
>>>> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
>>>> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
>>>> @@ -2274,6 +2274,10 @@ static void blk_mq_exit_hctx(struct request_queue *q,
>>>> set->ops->exit_hctx(hctx, hctx_idx);
>>>> blk_mq_remove_cpuhp(hctx);
>>>> +
>>>> + spin_lock(&q->dead_hctx_lock);
>>>> + list_add(&hctx->hctx_list, &q->dead_hctx_list);
>>>> + spin_unlock(&q->dead_hctx_lock);
>>>> }
>>>> static void blk_mq_exit_hw_queues(struct request_queue *q,
>>>> @@ -2675,15 +2679,13 @@ static int blk_mq_alloc_ctxs(struct request_queue *q)
>>>> */
>>>> void blk_mq_release(struct request_queue *q)
>>>> {
>>>> - struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
>>>> - unsigned int i;
>>>> + struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, *next;
>>>> cancel_delayed_work_sync(&q->requeue_work);
>>>> - /* hctx kobj stays in hctx */
>>>> - queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i) {
>>>> - if (!hctx)
>>>> - continue;
>>>> + /* all hctx are in .dead_hctx_list now */
>>>> + list_for_each_entry_safe(hctx, next, &q->dead_hctx_list, hctx_list) {
>>>> + list_del_init(&hctx->hctx_list);
>>>> kobject_put(&hctx->kobj);
>>>> }
>>>> @@ -2750,9 +2752,22 @@ static struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *blk_mq_alloc_and_init_hctx(
>>>> struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct request_queue *q,
>>>> int hctx_idx, int node)
>>>> {
>>>> - struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
>>>> + struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = NULL, *tmp;
>>>> +
>>>> + /* reuse dead hctx first */
>>>> + spin_lock(&q->dead_hctx_lock);
>>>> + list_for_each_entry(tmp, &q->dead_hctx_list, hctx_list) {
>>>> + if (tmp->numa_node == node) {
>>>> + hctx = tmp;
>>>> + break;
>>>> + }
>>>> + }
>>>> + if (hctx)
>>>> + list_del_init(&hctx->hctx_list);
>>>> + spin_unlock(&q->dead_hctx_lock);
>>>> - hctx = blk_mq_alloc_hctx(q, set, hctx_idx, node);
>>>> + if (!hctx)
>>>> + hctx = blk_mq_alloc_hctx(q, set, hctx_idx, node);
>>>> if (!hctx)
>>>> goto fail;
>>>> @@ -2790,10 +2805,8 @@ static void blk_mq_realloc_hw_ctxs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
>>>> hctx = blk_mq_alloc_and_init_hctx(set, q, i, node);
>>>> if (hctx) {
>>>> - if (hctxs[i]) {
>>>> + if (hctxs[i])
>>>> blk_mq_exit_hctx(q, set, hctxs[i], i);
>>>> - kobject_put(&hctxs[i]->kobj);
>>>> - }
>>>> hctxs[i] = hctx;
>>>> } else {
>>>> if (hctxs[i])
>>>> @@ -2824,9 +2837,7 @@ static void blk_mq_realloc_hw_ctxs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
>>>> if (hctx->tags)
>>>> blk_mq_free_map_and_requests(set, j);
>>>> blk_mq_exit_hctx(q, set, hctx, j);
>>>> - kobject_put(&hctx->kobj);
>>>> hctxs[j] = NULL;
>>>> -
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>> mutex_unlock(&q->sysfs_lock);
>>>> @@ -2869,6 +2880,9 @@ struct request_queue *blk_mq_init_allocated_queue(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
>>>> if (!q->queue_hw_ctx)
>>>> goto err_sys_init;
>>>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&q->dead_hctx_list);
>>>> + spin_lock_init(&q->dead_hctx_lock);
>>>> +
>>>> blk_mq_realloc_hw_ctxs(set, q);
>>>> if (!q->nr_hw_queues)
>>>> goto err_hctxs;
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/blk-mq.h b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
>>>> index db29928de467..15d1aa53d96c 100644
>>>> --- a/include/linux/blk-mq.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
>>>> @@ -70,6 +70,8 @@ struct blk_mq_hw_ctx {
>>>> struct dentry *sched_debugfs_dir;
>>>> #endif
>>>> + struct list_head hctx_list;
>>>> +
>>>> /* Must be the last member - see also blk_mq_hw_ctx_size(). */
>>>> struct srcu_struct srcu[0];
>>>> };
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
>>>> index 4b85dc066264..1325f941f0be 100644
>>>> --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
>>>> @@ -535,6 +535,13 @@ struct request_queue {
>>>> struct mutex sysfs_lock;
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * for reusing dead hctx instance in case of updating
>>>> + * nr_hw_queues
>>>> + */
>>>> + struct list_head dead_hctx_list;
>>>> + spinlock_t dead_hctx_lock;
>>>> +
>>>> atomic_t mq_freeze_depth;
>>>> #if defined(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_BSG)
>>>>
>>> Hmm.
>>> I don't particularly like this approach.
>>> The much saner approach would be to avoid having I/O in-flight in the first
>>> place by setting the queue to something else than live, no?
>>
>> There isn't any in-flight IO since blk_mq_freeze_queue() is returned
>> from __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues().
>>
>> However, there can be reference to hctx in other code paths via
>> arbitrary block layer APIs.
>>
>> Quiesce can't avoid the use-after-free too given RCU read lock may
>> not be held in lots of reference to hctx, such as queue_for_each_hw_ctx().
>>
>> So this patch might be the simplest approach to fix this issue, IMO.
>>
>> However, I am open to any solution for this issue.
>
> Hi Hannes,
>
> Could you please let us know if you have better idea for this issue?
> Otherwise, I think we need to move on since it is real issue, and users
> want to fix that.
>
Okay. Having looked over the problem and possible alternatives, it looks
indeed like a viable solution.
I do agree that it's a sensible design to have an additional holding
area for hardware context elements, given that they might be reassigned
during blk_mq_realloc_hw_ctxs().
However, I would rename the 'dead' elements to 'unused' (ie
unused_hctx_list etc).
And I would deallocate q->queue_hw_ctx in blk_mq_exit_queue() to make
things more consistent.
Problem with the current patch is that in blk_mq_release() we iterate
the 'dead_hctx_list' and free up everything in there, but then blindly
call 'kfree(q->queue_hw_ctx)' without checking if there are any context
pointers left.
When moving the call to blk_mq_exit_queue() we could to a simple
WARN_ON(q->queue_hw_ctx) in blk_mq_release() to ensure that everything
got deallocated properly.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare at suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg
GF: Felix Imend?rffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah
HRB 21284 (AG N?rnberg)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-23 11:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-17 3:44 [PATCH V6 0/9] blk-mq: fix races related with freeing queue Ming Lei
2019-04-17 3:44 ` [PATCH V6 1/9] blk-mq: grab .q_usage_counter when queuing request from plug code path Ming Lei
2019-04-17 3:44 ` [PATCH V6 2/9] blk-mq: move cancel of requeue_work into blk_mq_release Ming Lei
2019-04-17 12:00 ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-04-17 3:44 ` [PATCH V6 3/9] blk-mq: free hw queue's resource in hctx's release handler Ming Lei
2019-04-17 12:02 ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-04-17 3:44 ` [PATCH V6 4/9] blk-mq: move all hctx alloction & initialization into __blk_mq_alloc_and_init_hctx Ming Lei
2019-04-17 12:03 ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-04-17 3:44 ` [PATCH V6 5/9] blk-mq: split blk_mq_alloc_and_init_hctx into two parts Ming Lei
2019-04-17 3:44 ` [PATCH V6 6/9] blk-mq: always free hctx after request queue is freed Ming Lei
2019-04-17 12:08 ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-04-17 12:59 ` Ming Lei
2019-04-22 3:30 ` Ming Lei
2019-04-23 11:19 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2019-04-23 13:30 ` Ming Lei
2019-04-23 14:07 ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-04-24 1:12 ` Ming Lei
2019-04-24 1:45 ` Ming Lei
2019-04-24 5:55 ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-04-17 3:44 ` [PATCH V6 7/9] blk-mq: move cancel of hctx->run_work into blk_mq_hw_sysfs_release Ming Lei
2019-04-17 3:44 ` [PATCH V6 8/9] block: don't drain in-progress dispatch in blk_cleanup_queue() Ming Lei
2019-04-17 3:44 ` [PATCH V6 9/9] nvme: hold request queue's refcount in ns's whole lifetime Ming Lei
2019-04-17 12:10 ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-04-17 15:55 ` Keith Busch
2019-04-17 17:22 ` [PATCH V6 0/9] blk-mq: fix races related with freeing queue James Smart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9d93cb74-0683-bb42-2545-b4bb2bfbb831@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox