From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Chao Leng <lengchao@huawei.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, sagi@grimberg.me,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, axboe@fb.com, kbusch@kernel.org,
hch@lst.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] avoid double request completion and IO error
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 17:14:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210203161455.GB4116@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210201034940.18891-1-lengchao@huawei.com>
So I think this is conceptually fine, but I still find the API a little
arcane. What do you think about the following incremental patch?
If that looks good and tests good for you I can apply the series with
the modifications:
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
index 0befaad788a094..02579f4f776c7d 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
@@ -355,6 +355,21 @@ void nvme_complete_rq(struct request *req)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvme_complete_rq);
+/*
+ * Called to unwind from ->queue_rq on a failed command submission so that the
+ * multipathing code gets called to potentially failover to another path.
+ * The caller needs to unwind all transport specific resource allocations and
+ * must return propagate the return value.
+ */
+blk_status_t nvme_host_path_error(struct request *req)
+{
+ nvme_req(req)->status = NVME_SC_HOST_PATH_ERROR;
+ blk_mq_set_request_complete(req);
+ nvme_complete_rq(req);
+ return BLK_STS_OK;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvme_host_path_error);
+
bool nvme_cancel_request(struct request *req, void *data, bool reserved)
{
dev_dbg_ratelimited(((struct nvme_ctrl *) data)->device,
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/fabrics.c b/drivers/nvme/host/fabrics.c
index cedf9b31898673..5dfd806fc2d28c 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/fabrics.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/fabrics.c
@@ -552,11 +552,7 @@ blk_status_t nvmf_fail_nonready_command(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl,
!test_bit(NVME_CTRL_FAILFAST_EXPIRED, &ctrl->flags) &&
!blk_noretry_request(rq) && !(rq->cmd_flags & REQ_NVME_MPATH))
return BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
-
- nvme_req(rq)->status = NVME_SC_HOST_PATH_ERROR;
- blk_mq_set_request_complete(rq);
- nvme_complete_rq(rq);
- return BLK_STS_OK;
+ return nvme_host_path_error(rq);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvmf_fail_nonready_command);
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h b/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h
index a72f0718109100..5819f038104149 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h
@@ -575,6 +575,7 @@ static inline bool nvme_is_aen_req(u16 qid, __u16 command_id)
}
void nvme_complete_rq(struct request *req);
+blk_status_t nvme_host_path_error(struct request *req);
bool nvme_cancel_request(struct request *req, void *data, bool reserved);
void nvme_cancel_tagset(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl);
void nvme_cancel_admin_tagset(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl);
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c b/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
index 6993efb27b39f0..f51af5e4970a2b 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
@@ -2091,16 +2091,6 @@ static blk_status_t nvme_rdma_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
err = nvme_rdma_post_send(queue, sqe, req->sge, req->num_sge,
req->mr ? &req->reg_wr.wr : NULL);
if (unlikely(err)) {
- if (err == -EIO) {
- /*
- * Fail the reqest so upper layer can failover I/O
- * if another path is available
- */
- req->status = NVME_SC_HOST_PATH_ERROR;
- blk_mq_set_request_complete(rq);
- nvme_rdma_complete_rq(rq);
- return BLK_STS_OK;
- }
goto err_unmap;
}
@@ -2109,7 +2099,9 @@ static blk_status_t nvme_rdma_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
err_unmap:
nvme_rdma_unmap_data(queue, rq);
err:
- if (err == -ENOMEM || err == -EAGAIN)
+ if (err == -EIO)
+ ret = nvme_host_path_error(rq);
+ else if (err == -ENOMEM || err == -EAGAIN)
ret = BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
else
ret = BLK_STS_IOERR;
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-03 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-01 3:49 [PATCH v5 0/3] avoid double request completion and IO error Chao Leng
2021-02-01 3:49 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] blk-mq: introduce blk_mq_set_request_complete Chao Leng
2021-02-04 15:27 ` Jens Axboe
2021-02-04 15:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-04 15:32 ` Jens Axboe
2021-02-04 15:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-04 15:41 ` Jens Axboe
2021-02-01 3:49 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] nvme-fabrics: avoid double request completion for nvmf_fail_nonready_command Chao Leng
2021-02-01 3:49 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] nvme-rdma: avoid IO error for nvme native multipath Chao Leng
2021-02-03 16:14 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2021-02-03 22:22 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] avoid double request completion and IO error Sagi Grimberg
2021-02-04 5:56 ` Chao Leng
2021-02-04 8:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-05 2:02 ` Chao Leng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210203161455.GB4116@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=lengchao@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox