From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com>,
Chunguang Xu <brookxu.cn@gmail.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] nvem: rdma: move start freeze into nvme_rdma_configure_io_queues
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 23:35:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230710153555.1766438-7-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230710153555.1766438-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
Move start_freeze into nvme_rdma_configure_io_queues(), and there is
at least two benefits:
1) freeze and unfreeze are done in pair
2) IO during error recovery can be failfast quickly because nvme fabrics
unquiesces queues after teardown.
One side-effect is that !mpath request may timeout during connecting
because of queue topo change, but that looks not one big deal:
1) same problem exists with current code base
2) compared with !mpath, mpath use case is dominant
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c b/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
index cdfa93d67b80..ec365ee9ad0e 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
@@ -883,6 +883,7 @@ static int nvme_rdma_configure_io_queues(struct nvme_rdma_ctrl *ctrl, bool new)
goto out_cleanup_tagset;
if (!new) {
+ nvme_start_freeze(&ctrl->ctrl);
nvme_unquiesce_io_queues(&ctrl->ctrl);
if (!nvme_wait_freeze_timeout(&ctrl->ctrl, NVME_IO_TIMEOUT)) {
/*
@@ -891,6 +892,7 @@ static int nvme_rdma_configure_io_queues(struct nvme_rdma_ctrl *ctrl, bool new)
* to be safe.
*/
ret = -ENODEV;
+ nvme_unfreeze(&ctrl->ctrl);
goto out_wait_freeze_timed_out;
}
blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues(ctrl->ctrl.tagset,
@@ -940,7 +942,6 @@ static void nvme_rdma_teardown_io_queues(struct nvme_rdma_ctrl *ctrl,
bool remove)
{
if (ctrl->ctrl.queue_count > 1) {
- nvme_start_freeze(&ctrl->ctrl);
nvme_quiesce_io_queues(&ctrl->ctrl);
nvme_sync_io_queues(&ctrl->ctrl);
nvme_rdma_stop_io_queues(ctrl);
--
2.40.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-10 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-10 15:35 [PATCH 0/6] nvme fabircs: move start freeze into reconnection work Ming Lei
2023-07-10 15:35 ` [PATCH 1/6] nvme: unquiesce io queues when removing namespaces Ming Lei
2023-07-10 15:37 ` Keith Busch
2023-07-11 7:32 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-07-11 8:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-07-11 8:31 ` Ming Lei
2023-07-11 9:12 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-07-10 15:35 ` [PATCH 2/6] nvme: tcp: remove 'shutdown' parameters from two teardown helpers Ming Lei
2023-07-11 7:38 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-07-11 7:39 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-07-10 15:35 ` [PATCH 3/6] nvme: tcp: unquiesce queues after ctrl state is changed Ming Lei
2023-07-11 7:41 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-07-11 7:53 ` Ming Lei
2023-07-11 9:05 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-07-10 15:35 ` [PATCH 4/6] nvme: rdma: unquiesce queues until " Ming Lei
2023-07-11 7:42 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-07-10 15:35 ` [PATCH 5/6] nvem: tcp: move start freeze into nvme_tcp_configure_io_queues Ming Lei
2023-07-11 7:36 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-07-10 15:35 ` Ming Lei [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230710153555.1766438-7-ming.lei@redhat.com \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=brookxu.cn@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=yi.zhang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox