From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Keith Busch <kbusch@meta.com>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: fix cns check
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 10:09:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241011080925.GE2749@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zwfuqf_PAP06GG1-@kbusch-mbp>
On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 09:11:37AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> It's not going to return anything useful. The 1.1 compliant controller
> truncates Command Set Specific ID Ctrl (CNS 06h) to just two bits (2h),
> believing the host requested the a namespace list, and the host will
> think the success means it has different identification data.
>
> I was only thinking about this because of the rotational media patches
> were using the same criteria that would let a 1.1 complaint controller
> see another Identify that will have a truncated CNS.
Ok, I finally understand what you are doing now, I as just beeing
stupid before (and maybe the commit log didn't help enough, but I don't
want to shift blame :)).
So yes, something like this is probably fine. But maybe we'll want to
struture it in a way that is easier to read instead of having two
helpers to decide which CNS value is supported. Maybe something
like:
static bool nvme_identify_cns_allowed(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, u8 cns)
{
switch (ctrl->vs) {
default:
/*
* Starting with NVMe 1.2 the CNS field occupies a full
* byte.
*/
return true;
case NVME_VS(1, 1, 0):
/*
* NVMe 1.1 expanded the CNS value to two bytes, which
* means values larger than that could get truncated
* and treated as an incorrect value.
*
* Qemu implemented 1.0 behavior for controllers claiming
* 1.1 compliance, so they need to be quirked here.
*/
if (!(ctrl->quirks & NVME_QUIRK_IDENTIFY_CNS))
return !(cns & ~0x02);
fallthrough;
case NVME_VS(1, 0, 0):
/*
* NVMe 1.0 only used a single for the CNS value.
* (That's where the name comes from:
* Controller or Namespace Structure)
*/
return !(cns & ~0x01);
}
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-11 8:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-09 21:40 [PATCH] nvme: fix cns check Keith Busch
2024-10-10 7:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-10 15:11 ` Keith Busch
2024-10-11 8:09 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-10-15 14:36 ` Keith Busch
2024-10-15 15:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-15 15:20 ` Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241011080925.GE2749@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kbusch@meta.com \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox