public inbox for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: "brookxu.cn" <brookxu.cn@gmail.com>
Cc: kbusch@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, hch@lst.de, sagi@grimberg.me,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] nvme-rdma: unquiesce admin_q before destroy it
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 08:21:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241125072102.GA15647@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9379940137a8dfddb451917c1d069eebaf3c209e.1732368538.git.chunguang.xu@shopee.com>

On Sat, Nov 23, 2024 at 09:37:37PM +0800, brookxu.cn wrote:
> This due to we have quiesced admi_q before cancel requests, but forgot
> to unquiesce before destroy it, as a result we fail to drain the
> pending requests, and hang on blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait() forever. Here
> try to reuse nvme_rdma_teardown_admin_queue() to fix this issue and
> simplify the code.

Looks good, and matches what the TCP driver is doing:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>



  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-25  7:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <cover.1732368538.git.chunguang.xu@shopee.com>
2024-11-23 13:37 ` [PATCH 1/5] nvme-rdma: unquiesce admin_q before destroy it brookxu.cn
2024-11-25  7:21   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-11-29 11:18   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-12-24 11:53   ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-11-23 13:37 ` [PATCH 2/5] nvme-tcp: no need to quiesec admin_q in nvme_tcp_teardown_io_queues() brookxu.cn
2024-11-25  7:22   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-25  7:55     ` 许春光
2024-11-29 11:18   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-11-23 13:37 ` [PATCH 3/5] nvme-tcp: simplify nvme_tcp_configure_admin_queue() brookxu.cn
2024-11-25  7:22   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-29 11:19   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-11-23 13:37 ` [PATCH 4/5] nvme-tcp: remove nvme_tcp_destroy_io_queues() brookxu.cn
2024-11-25  7:24   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-25  7:51     ` 许春光
2024-11-29 11:22   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-11-23 13:37 ` [PATCH 5/5] nvme-tcp: fix the memleak while create new ctrl failed brookxu.cn
2024-11-25  7:25   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241125072102.GA15647@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=brookxu.cn@gmail.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox