From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: "brookxu.cn" <brookxu.cn@gmail.com>
Cc: kbusch@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, hch@lst.de, sagi@grimberg.me,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] nvme-tcp: no need to quiesec admin_q in nvme_tcp_teardown_io_queues()
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 08:22:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241125072240.GB15647@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e7c1d7b531cef5fdd2764719e4ca824477579083.1732368538.git.chunguang.xu@shopee.com>
On Sat, Nov 23, 2024 at 09:37:38PM +0800, brookxu.cn wrote:
> From: "Chunguang.xu" <chunguang.xu@shopee.com>
>
> As we quiesec admin_q in nvme_tcp_teardown_admin_queue(), so we should no
> need to quiesec it in nvme_tcp_reaardown_io_queues(), make things simple.
Yes. And this matches what RDMA is doing. We really need to go
back to the attempt to consolidaste this code..
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-25 7:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cover.1732368538.git.chunguang.xu@shopee.com>
2024-11-23 13:37 ` [PATCH 1/5] nvme-rdma: unquiesce admin_q before destroy it brookxu.cn
2024-11-25 7:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-29 11:18 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-12-24 11:53 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-11-23 13:37 ` [PATCH 2/5] nvme-tcp: no need to quiesec admin_q in nvme_tcp_teardown_io_queues() brookxu.cn
2024-11-25 7:22 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-11-25 7:55 ` 许春光
2024-11-29 11:18 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-11-23 13:37 ` [PATCH 3/5] nvme-tcp: simplify nvme_tcp_configure_admin_queue() brookxu.cn
2024-11-25 7:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-29 11:19 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-11-23 13:37 ` [PATCH 4/5] nvme-tcp: remove nvme_tcp_destroy_io_queues() brookxu.cn
2024-11-25 7:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-25 7:51 ` 许春光
2024-11-29 11:22 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-11-23 13:37 ` [PATCH 5/5] nvme-tcp: fix the memleak while create new ctrl failed brookxu.cn
2024-11-25 7:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241125072240.GB15647@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brookxu.cn@gmail.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox