From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: Chao Shi <coshi036@gmail.com>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Tatsuya Sasaki <tatsuya6.sasaki@kioxia.com>,
Maurizio Lombardi <mlombard@arkamax.eu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sungwoo Kim <iam@sung-woo.kim>,
Dave Tian <daveti@purdue.edu>, Weidong Zhu <weizhu@fiu.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nvme: reserve a keep-alive admin tag for all transports
Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 10:25:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260521082549.GA11208@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ag4Y5R1X0gkZbU-g@kbusch-mbp>
On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 02:26:13PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2026 at 03:12:48AM -0400, Chao Shi wrote:
> > Per NVMe 2.0a section 5.27.1.12 and the transport binding wording,
> > PCIe MAY support KATO. Reserve one admin tag on all transports so
> > the host is ready when a controller accepts the feature. Fabrics
> > keeps two, the second being for the connect command.
> >
> > A quirk-based approach was considered but no PCIe controller
> > documented to declare KAS != 0 was found (two enterprise SSDs tested
> > locally report KAS=0), so an allowlist has no entries today.
>
> I totally get it's optional for PCIe, but that also means it's the
> host's option on whether it wants to use it, and there's no requirement
> we have to. We just need the driver react correctly when someone tries
> to do it.
>
> I am skeptical anyone would produce a PCIe device that supports it, but
> let's say someone does: what is the use case motivating enabling this
> optional feature in this driver? If it's just because the option is
> there, then I think we can just reject the user command submitting the
> feature for PCIe transports, like I earlier suggested. Requiring an
> active command will just harm idle power states.
I don't think that's quite the point. We'd have to add special
filtering to fix the reproducer. Compared to that just reserving
a tag and officially supporting the feature is much easier and a much
better story.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-21 8:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-15 7:12 [PATCH v2] nvme: reserve a keep-alive admin tag for all transports Chao Shi
2026-05-19 7:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-05-20 20:26 ` Keith Busch
2026-05-21 8:25 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-05-21 14:38 ` Keith Busch
2026-05-22 12:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-05-22 15:32 ` Chao S
2026-05-22 15:33 ` Chao S
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260521082549.GA11208@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=coshi036@gmail.com \
--cc=daveti@purdue.edu \
--cc=iam@sung-woo.kim \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mlombard@arkamax.eu \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=tatsuya6.sasaki@kioxia.com \
--cc=weizhu@fiu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox