From: jsmart2021@gmail.com (James Smart)
Subject: [PATCH v2] nvmet_fc: support target port removal with nvmet layer
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2018 13:40:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4788aa25-5852-7041-7cd2-9a5b950153ca@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1536179041.8172.49.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On 9/5/2018 1:24 PM, Ewan D. Milne wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-09-05@12:56 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> Ewan, James: what is the conclusion on this patch? The discussion
>> seems to have faded.
>
> I think where we left it was that I found a case where the patch
> exposed a problem that James thought needed a fix in the lpfc driver.
>
> The basic problem with the tree right now is that "nvmetcli clear"
> frees the nvmet_port object but nvmet_fc_tgtport still points to the
> freed memory. So, if a subsequent connect request comes in, we
> reference the freed memory. I normally run with slub_debug=FZPU, so I
> get a crash right away. Otherwise you might never notice (but our
> QE people have seen odd behavior, which sent me looking...)
>
> With James' v2 patch, he addresses the problem, however now there is
> a different one, which is that if the target is not configured, and
> a connect request comes in, we hang on the initiator side.
>
> This is all with the NVMe/FC soft target.
>
> -Ewan
I have no problems with the nvme soft target, but my soft target did
have the fcloop fix for dropped LS requests, which Christoph pulled in a
few days ago.
-- james
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-05 20:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-09 23:48 [PATCH v2] nvmet_fc: support target port removal with nvmet layer James Smart
2018-08-10 17:53 ` Ewan D. Milne
2018-08-10 23:21 ` James Smart
2018-08-13 16:38 ` Ewan D. Milne
2018-08-10 20:50 ` Ewan D. Milne
2018-08-10 23:04 ` James Smart
2018-09-05 19:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-09-05 20:12 ` James Smart
2018-09-11 7:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-09-05 20:24 ` Ewan D. Milne
2018-09-05 20:40 ` James Smart [this message]
2018-09-11 7:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-09-11 17:01 ` James Smart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4788aa25-5852-7041-7cd2-9a5b950153ca@gmail.com \
--to=jsmart2021@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox